ARCHIVERead-only snapshot of the zulm.net forums, captured 12 November 2026.Home · Members · Search · About

All times are UTC




   [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
Thanks to Vijay Dinanath Chavan for these shots!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 4:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
6/10 :oops:

Ali


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
Comparison shots from the UK MovieBox release. This is a PAL disc and looks to be the same master WEG used for its PAL-to-NTSC version, so this is probably the best one to go for.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Last edited by Stephen on Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
looks more grain on this second version( orig film or?

WEG seems sharper to me? :?:


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
arsh wrote:
looks more grain on this second version( orig film or?

WEG seems sharper to me? :?:


Shemaroo probably applied more DNR on their version, with more blurring problems as a result. Also, unlike the Shemaroo DVD, the MovieBox/WEG disc is not field-averaged which definitely helps the sharpness.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I do prefer your SS though over shemaroo :wink:


Top
   
 
   [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC




cron