ARCHIVERead-only snapshot of the zulm.net forums, captured 12 November 2026.Home · Members · Search · About

All times are UTC




   [ 106 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2004 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
Yahrajfilms.com:
DVD
Item Code : YRD 0152
Price : US$17.99

Shipping costs extra.

========================================

Nehaflix.com:
Availability: Usually ships in 2-3 business days.

DarrDVDReg: $19.99 Sale: $17.99

========================================

Case Closed on the Price War!


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2004 1:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 6:44 pm
Posts: 205
Location: Rolla, MO, USA
could anyone throw some light on the audio quality, the one from dei/eros was two channel. I hope that the dvd has real dolby digital one as it has the best background sound.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2004 5:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
i ordered it a week ago from nehaflix with other yrf stuff that was for 9..9 when it comes then i will post how the sq is


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2004 7:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
This film was made before 5.1 came to India, so I doubt the DVD will have a true 5.1 track. Was it mono or stereo?


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 10:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
i got the dvd the sound is better then the dei-eros over all in my opinion i like this version better and the same sound is panned on all speakers so its not true 5.1 but the sound is way better for me then the dei-eros one


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Izzy, that's the worst kind of mono :D


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
what is the running time for the dei-eros version? the yrf version is 2h 49min


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
DragunR2 wrote:
Izzy, that's the worst kind of mono :D


But it is PRETTY LOUD GURU :wink:


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
It is NOT PROG! just to let u know, whoever cared!

It is pretty decent! FULL AR looks very good though! Colors are REAL VIVID/SHARP


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
Thanks to Arsh for these shots!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Not too shabby. I hope they will start releasing classic films with decent quality now.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I concur!!I find DARR PQ "DECENT" by default with OAR!and anamorphic transfer being the bonus! It has GOOD SHARPNESS/COLORS, Looks good mostly!


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 1:50 pm
Posts: 235
I just recieved my YRF copy of DARR. The only reason I bought this DVD was to do a comparison with my DEI/EROS copy. The differences seem minor but then again, to some they are core differences.

YRF, has an Anamorphic Widescreen, Dolby 5.1(seems pretty audible), Extras-Yash Chopra(as usual trying to butcher the english language) and the music launch . Run time:2:49

DEI/EROS has a 4:3 aspect ratio, from what I can tell and is cropped(compare screenshots), seems a tad grainer and darker in certain scenes but color and fidelity is pretty good, sharpness and contrast better than YRF. Shots taken in motion look much better in DEI/EROS. Run time:2:56
Below are the screenshots: Top YRF; Bottom DEI/EROS:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

I do wonder why the difference in run-time between the two versions.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
The time difference could be due to difference between PAL and NTSC (or miss mash of conversions done in between). Roughly PAL is 4% faster, so 2:56 NTSC would be about 2:46mins in PAL.
BBFC has reference run times too for film and video.

Ali


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:20 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Resized screen shots for easy viewing for people with small monitors :oops:

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Ali


Top
   
 
   [ 106 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC