ARCHIVERead-only snapshot of the zulm.net forums, captured 12 November 2026.Home · Members · Search · About

Board index » Others » Bak Bak

All times are UTC




   Page 1 of 1
  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
sasural
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 454
Location: USA
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01 ... ml?_r=1&hp
Strange but very true. Muslims are always blamed and here Christians raped a 12 year old Muslim girl but no condemnation against the Christians.
Top
   
 
DVD Collector
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 2070
Location: Toronto, Canada
I think it's a bit unfair to take sides with who's at fault here(obviously, sexual rape is morally wrong on all accounts), but more importantly, discovering who's behind the source of information your reading.
Top
   
 
sasural
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 454
Location: USA
DVD Collector wrote:
I think it's a bit unfair to take sides with who's at fault here(obviously, sexual rape is morally wrong on all accounts), but more importantly, discovering who's behind the source of information your reading.

It is not a question about taking sides and about the source of the information.It is all about the source of the crime and what the media (New York Times) is trying to feed to the public.
Top
   
 
DVD Collector
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 2070
Location: Toronto, Canada
I guess I would agree with you. Even when the NY Times tries to be their objective best(especially with their stands on Islam), they still come across as some what contrived.

My suggesstion; Ignore all media sources owned by The New York Times Company & News Corporation. Though, that leaves you with very little options.
Top
   
 
sasural
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 454
Location: USA
DVD Collector wrote:
I guess I would agree with you. Even when the NY Times tries to be their objective best(especially with their stands on Islam), they still come across as some what contrived.

My suggesstion; Ignore all media sources owned by The New York Times Company & News Corporation. Though, that leaves you with very little options.

The NY Times is very biased.
Top
   
 
   Page 1 of 1
  [ 5 posts ] 

Board index » Others » Bak Bak

All times are UTC




Preservation copy of the zulm.net forums. Private forums, member profiles and login features are not included. About this archive