ARCHIVERead-only snapshot of the zulm.net forums, captured 12 November 2026.Home · Members · Search · About

All times are UTC




   [ 437 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 30  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
Sanjay wrote:
Yuvan wrote:
just so we are clear, by 'original' cut you mean "Theatrical" cut?
For those that may not know this, actually there are 'TWO' Original/Theatrical cuts of Sholay. That does not make much sense now, does it? Well, Sholay was released/screened with both 35MM (Mono Sound) and 70MM (Six Track Sound) prints. The 70MM print was from day one, a longer cut of the film. There was another, even longer 3rd cut of the film, which included the 'Qawalli' sequence and was released in theatres later on in some parts of the country. Finally there is another cut now with an alternate ending, which actually is the original ending, the one that was not passed by the censor board back in 1975.



Nice. :nopity:


and people talk about RGV not getting it right the first time. so what you are saying is that there are a dozen Sholay releases? I'll watch this dvd first, unless it'll end up at the next film festival....which I highly doubt.

thanks for the info!


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 1:50 pm
Posts: 235
It would be great to put the DEI sound on this DVD. that would probably make it the best version of SHOLAY out there..........ANAMORPHIC SHOLAY WITH DEI SOUND....


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
DEI on top, Carlotta on bottom. I couldn't find the corresponding shot on the DEI disc for the cap of Basanti feeding the horse.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I simply love AR! :P


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
thanks dragun. a bit scary how accurately you were able to capture.

I'll be ordering this in the new year.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 8:14 pm
Posts: 1086
DEI looks better to me on these stills (except for the AR issue).


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
mhafner wrote:
DEI looks better to me on these stills (except for the AR issue).


Surely not - Look at how much detail is lost in the 'Mehbooba' scene on DEI's DVD.

Thanks for the comparison snaps, Dragun. :)


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Stephen wrote:
mhafner wrote:
DEI looks better to me on these stills (except for the AR issue).


Surely not - Look at how much detail is lost in the 'Mehbooba' scene on DEI's DVD.

Thanks for the comparison snaps, Dragun. :)


I agree with Stephen, I do prefer new conversion!! :P


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
:stupid: I'm with stupids :P

DEI looks artificial. the colors from the screen shots seem somewhat vibrant but it's all artificial crap with a softer picture. the contrast is much better on the new release, and the colors look more natural(for that period?), rather than 'enhanced'.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Yuvan wrote:
:stupid: I'm with stupids :P

DEI looks artificial. the colors from the screen shots seem somewhat vibrant but it's all artificial crap with a softer picture. the contrast is much better on the new release, and the colors look more natural(for that period?), rather than 'enhanced'.


you got it right this time yuvana!! 8) new transfer, a bit soft, seems more natural :roll:


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 6:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Stephen wrote:
mhafner wrote:
DEI looks better to me on these stills (except for the AR issue).


Surely not - Look at how much detail is lost in the 'Mehbooba' scene on DEI's DVD.

Thanks for the comparison snaps, Dragun. :)


If you did not answer that before..I believe film is PAL, R2(or R0) ? and 25fps?


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
arsh wrote:
If you did not answer that before..I believe film is PAL, R2(or R0) ? and 25fps?


Yep, the discs are region 2 and both PAL 25fps. A proper conversion with no interlaced frames (all the screenshots were taken in Force Weave mode).


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6148
Stephen wrote:
mhafner wrote:
DEI looks better to me on these stills (except for the AR issue).


Surely not - Look at how much detail is lost in the 'Mehbooba' scene on DEI's DVD.

Thanks for the comparison snaps, Dragun. :)


I'm unable to say which PQ is better. What detail is visible depends on Contrast and Brightness settings at the time of making and then at the time of displaying. At brightness level set on my screen, anamorphic version shows more detail in the Mehbooba song but for other/ many other scenes I see more detail in DEI shots.

For detail comparison, should view each image separately and adjust brightness and contrast to make both images same bright.

With brightness and more detail also come noise. Have to optimize PQ overall. Also depends on how much detail the director (video or film) wanted to be visible associated with how much noise.

We also need to remember, PAL PQ is 20% better than NTSC, all other things staying same. On top, PAL version is anamorphic (33% better) making anamorphic PAL PQ potentially 60% better.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
The DEI transfer looks like it has some contrast boosting. Flesh tones go toward magenta/reddish color compared to the Carlotta version. Colors on the DEI generally look more saturated, though on the shot of Hema her sari is more saturated in the Carlotta version. To me the colors on the Carlotta disc look truer, though the image as a whole looks a little "light."

Mehbooba Mehbooba is very dark on the DEI disc. I suspect this is how it was shot originally. That, coupled with the DNR makes it at times hard to tell what's going on. Does this song on the Carlotta disc look artificially brightened?


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
DragunR2 wrote:
The DEI transfer looks like it has some contrast boosting. Flesh tones go toward magenta/reddish color compared to the Carlotta version. Colors on the DEI generally look more saturated, though on the shot of Hema her sari is more saturated in the Carlotta version. To me the colors on the Carlotta disc look truer, though the image as a whole looks a little "light."

Mehbooba Mehbooba is very dark on the DEI disc. I suspect this is how it was shot originally. That, coupled with the DNR makes it at times hard to tell what's going on. Does this song on the Carlotta disc look artificially brightened?


The sequence on the Eros director's cut DVD is even lighter, so I don't think so. The brightness levels seem fairly consistent to me throughout the film. I personally prefer to have a lighter picture on a DVD rather than have detail lost completely in black like on so many contrast-heavy DEI discs.


Top
   
 
   [ 437 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 30  Next

All times are UTC