Shahran Sunny Audit wrote:
mhafner wrote:
Shankar is not a big fan of natural film grain. He likes smooth and glossy. Its his choice of film-making style and I have to respect it when doing the Blu-ray.
Basically yes. But does Shankar understand that the difference between 2K and 4K is mainly how grain is resolved (it's sharper) and using 4K is pointless if you 'wax/smear' everything afterwards? Does he understand that there are cameras out there that are grainless and possibly much better suited to his vision? I don't presume he actually likes the waxy look and all the smearing and DNR artifacts. ?
He's in charge to make it look as he wants. Not my decicison. My decision is to not buy as I absolutely detest this look.
Concerning the other Blu Rays allegedly in the works (Sholay, DDLJ) I can only hope any restoration is done with knowledge and taste, to make the films look like a fresh print from the original negative would have looked back then, and not some digitally mutilated abomination with DNR and other artifacts all over the place.