It is currently Fri Sep 26, 2025 11:21 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 450 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 30  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:21 am
Posts: 539
Location: Australia
IndiFm review

Let's get one thing straight! To remake a film that not only set box-office records and is referred to as a classic, but also one that by far has the biggest recall value, is playing with aag. Ramgopal Varma, the maverick film-maker, has the courage to remake SHOLAY, a film that continues to be one of the favorite entertainers across the globe.

Comparisons with SHOLAY are obvious and one presumes, RGV knew it all along that's he's bound to feel the heat by those who swear by SHOLAY. To give the credit where it's due, RGV remains faithful to the classic, not once does he deviate from the plot, not once does he twists facts… you know exactly what to expect and where the story is heading.

Jai, Veeru, Thakur, Basanti and above all Gabbar are characters that attained cult status over the years, especially Gabbar. RAMGOPAL VARMA KI AAG does justice to those characters, especially Gabbar, who wore a sinister look on his face all the while. Terror has a new name now. It's Babban!

Write your own movie review of Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag
Shortcomings? Oh yes! The romantic track, involving Ajay - Nisha Kothari, is a yawn. To be more specific, the by-now-famous 'suicide' sequence doesn't work. Prior to that, Prashant and Sushmita's meeting with Nisha's parents to seek her hand in marriage for Ajay also falls flat. Besides, this is not for the faint-hearted who detest violent films. RAMGOPAL VARMA KI AAG is sure to give them hiccups.

To cut a long story short, the comparisons with SHOLAY will tell on RAMGOPAL VARMA KI AAG.

In the dark underbelly of Mumbai city, a nihilistic new leader has risen to rule the fetid underworld. His name is Babban [Amitabh Bachchan]. Cruel beyond imagination, psychotically violent and far more devious than any gangster the city has ever known.

Nobody has ever seen him and if they did, they didn't survive to tell the tale. But one man believed in his existence. And that is Inspector Narsimha [Mohanlal], who has a single-minded determination to finish Babban.

RAMGOPAL VARMA KI AAG is SHOLAY, yet different. Sure, the story is the same, but the setting and interpretation of the story are different, very contemporary. As a storyteller, the RGV stamp is visible in a couple of sequences. Note Bachchan's spine-chilling introduction. Nisha's introductory sequence also makes you break into a chuckle. The Sachin episode that gives birth to a bitter enmity is tremendous. The sequence outside the courtroom [Bachchan - Mohanlal face off] is remarkable. Bachchan avenging his brother's death by eliminating Mohanlal's family is terrifying…

After a riveting first half, the pace suddenly slackens in the post-interval portions. Courtesy: The prem kahani. These scenes are far from exciting and only add to the length of the film. In fact, the second hour should be judiciously trimmed by at least 20/25 minutes so that the events unfold at a feverish pace.

There aren't many songs in the narrative. The song that deserves 10 on 10 is 'Mehbooba'. The track is foot-tapping and Urmila's presence sets the screen ablaze. Abhishek Bachchan's appearance in the number will be greeted with surprise and of course, whistles. The Holi track is interesting as well, more for the picturization, not as much for the tune.

Amit Roy's cinematography is outstanding. Note the scene when Bachchan plays with an apple and simply watch the movement of the camera. Awesome! Dialogues [Sajid-Farhad] are in sync with the mood of the film. Besides, the writers haven't lifted any of those legendary lines ['Kine aadmi thhe?', 'Soja, warna Gabbar aa jaayega', 'Yeh haath mujhe de-de Thakur'], but provide interesting alternatives. Action scenes [Pradhyumna] cater more to the desi audiences. Do not expect the MATRIX stunts here!

Bachchan as Babban is exemplary. The veteran has portrayed a variety of roles in his illustrious career: Vijay in ZANJEER, Vijay in DEEWAAR, Jai in SHOLAY, Anthony Gonsalves in AMAR AKBAR ANTHONY, Don/Vijay in DON, Vijay in TRISHUL, Sikandar in MUQADDAR KA SIKANDAR, Vijay Dinanath Chavan in AGNEEPATH, Baadshah Khan in KHUDA GAWAH, DCP Anant in KHAKEE, Debraj Sahai in BLACK, Sarkar in SARKAR and Eklavya in EKLAVYA. Now add Babban to this enviable list!

Mohanlal is topnotch. He matches up to Bachchan in every sequence. Ajay Devgan is competent and balances the mischievous streak with the serious one with ease. Newcomer Prashant Raj does very well. He stands up to the veterans and looks confident all through. Sushmita Sen is restrained. Her performance is perfect. Nisha Kothari does well in her introductory sequence and maintains the pace all through. Sushant Singh is first-rate. Rajpal Yadav irritates. Virendra Saxena is okay. Rasika Joshi makes her presence felt. Sanjay Narvekar, Jeeva, Raju Mavani, Ravi Kale, J.D. Chekravarthy and Suchitra Krishnamoorthi are adequate.

On the whole, RAMGOPAL VARMA KI AAG has a strong first half, but a lengthy and violent second half plays a spoilsport. At the box-office, the film will find the going tough in the wake of its comparisons with the mighty SHOLAY. Its dull opening coupled with uninspiring publicity [the posters/billboards give an impression of an outdated film] will make a dent in its prospects.

2/5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Khiladi wrote:

2/5


Taran gives it a 2! That's the biggest indicator so far that this might be actually a decent movie! :lol:

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Gets a 12A cert in the UK today;

http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classifie ... enDocument

...oddly with two different running lengths;

28/08/2007 Adlabs Films (UK) Ltd 163m 15s
30/08/2007 Adlabs Films (UK) Ltd 166m 58s

:?

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
http://www.rediff.com/movies/2007/aug/31aag1.htm

Quote:
A boring homage to Sholay

August 31, 2007 17:06 IST

It seems to me that Ram Gopal Varma doesn't care. Whether you like him or his movies or abhor both to pieces, he doesn't care.

And so he's boldly gone ahead and hit the axe on his once-celebrated creativity yet again. But this time he made sure everybody knows whose collar to pull by giving it an evidently 'Hold-me-responsible' title, Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag.

Well, you asked for it, Varma!

He believes himself to be the biggest fan of Ramesh Sippy's gargantuan blockbuster, Sholay [Images] and goes all out to destroy everything the legendary film stands for -- style, grit, showmanship, chemistry, charisma, star power, technique and masala, with this genuinely boring homage.

For starters, it follows the graph of the original but deviates slightly to dwell into unknown subtexts, which frankly, were best left unknown.

The premise is the same albeit in a contemporary backdrop. Revenge is still the key word. An ex-cop Narsimha (Mohanlal) employs two golden-hearted crooks to avenge the massacre of his family at the hands of Babban (Amitabh Bachchan). Before any of that happens, crook 1, Heero (Ajay Devgan) falls for a motor mouth auto rickshaw driver, Ghungroo (Nisha Kothari). Crook 2 aka Raj Ranade (Prashant Raj) meanwhile, sets his heart on the ghunghat-clad, widowed daughter-in-law (of Narsimha) Durga Devi (Sushmita Sen).

Gabbar, now Babban, doesn't terrorise the innocent gaonwalas anymore. He's Mumbai's underworld wolf who has swapped his bullet belt for Chor Bazaar's antique staff.

That out of the way, I'll tell you what's good about Aag for there's not much.

The rustic browns and bronzes of Sholay's mountains and vast rural spaces are replaced with dusty under-construction buildings, factory storerooms and a basti set-up. While Sholay's earthy palette brilliantly inspired the hues of Omkara's [Images] bucolic picture, cinematographer Amit Roy shoots familiar Mumbai's rundown lanes with efficiently composed angles and understated lighting. Though the camera's obsession with Nisha Kothari's [Images] butt is most off-putting.

What's not good?

Think Sholay. Think dialogues. Think Aag. Keep thinking. Here, 'Kitne aadmi the?' is reduced to 'Kitne?' and 'Yeh Ramgarh wale apni chokariyon ko kaun chakki ka atta khilate hain?' is tamely altered to 'Kya khaati hai re tu'? Writers Sajid-Farhad, unfortunately, lack the sensibility and mirth of Salim-Javed's crisp drama and keen wit. But the duo sure seems to watch a lot of news. All their analogies designed around Big B's [Images] punch lines are born out of the ongoing US-Iraq/Al Qaeda [Images] conflict.

While Sholay left behind a legacy of memorable characters like Gabbar, Thakur, Jai, Veeru, Basanti, Soorma Bhopali, Mausi and even Dhanno, Aag is, essentially, about Babban and everything he does. The rest is all incidental, even Narsimha getting back at him.

The opening credits smugly declare: Introducing Amitabh Bachchan [Images] as Babban. Needless to say, it's an unimpressive debut. Big B going on a hamming spree. Unlike his performance in Aks [Images], where he conveyed ferocity with finesse and restraint, here he's just plain weird and batty. The tuberculosis-like laughter only adds to our disbelief.

Aag doesn't evoke any fond nostalgia. Even when AB re-lives some of his Jai memories, playing the mouth organ and whispering 'Sholay, sholay, sholay�' or when the old Jai comes face to face with the new one, no golden moment here.

Ramu's obsession with Sholay's Gabbar is almost sweet, in a nightmarish way. It's like you are led inside a little guy's head (he must have been a boy when Sholay came out in 1970s) and his fascination with a larger-than-life big bad bearded boy from the movies. Being Ramu, anyone? Only if Charlie Kaufman is writing.

Watching a whole scale destruction of some of your favourite scenes in Sholay isn't a pleasant sight. Heero's drunken fury, for one, is quite an anti-climax to the famous 'Gaonwalon' sequence. Also imagine Helen having a post-Mehbooba yak with Gabbar. Shuddering thought, you may think. But curious Ramu finds out with an extended and meaningless scene between Urmila Matondkar (outdoing Daud's skin show in a kinky version of Mehbooba, also featuring an unnecessary Abhishek Bachchan [Images]) and AB.

While casting remains an unsurpassed ace in Sholay's glory trove, Aag could volunteer as a model for miscasting. There's no chemistry between Heero and Raj, Heero and Ghungroo, Raj and Durga, Durga and Narsimha, Narsimha and Babban or Babban and us.

Sushmita Sen [Images] conveys the strength of her Durga with refined grace while Prashant Raj [Images] (bears a striking resemblance to Heroes' Sylar and speaks with a thick Punjabi twang even when he's playing a Maharashtrian guy) shows spark.

Ajay Devgan [Images] is completely wasted in a role that doesn't do anything for him. The National award-winner is just one of the many guys in the frame, albeit a thug who wears designer crinkled shirts. His leading lady, Nisha Kothari, as seen in James and Shiva, continues to confuse making faces for acting. Mohanlal is suitably subdued and the most believable of them all.

Another letdown is the film's action. Ramu's films have always boasted of breathtaking thrills and Aag naturally begs for such treatment. But save for Bachchan going 'poof' in everyone's face, there's not really any hard-hitting dhishkyaon or dishoom. Key characters are bumped off so casually that you're not even sure they really died. It's not even funny. Hell, Aag isn't even corny. Instead, it's flat as a lasagna sheet. Oh how you miss the bustling horses of Sholay!

The simple reason why Aag fails at every level is that it doesn't evoke an ounce of fear. In the seventies, when Gabbar Singh happened, viewers were only used to nasty oppressive landlords or gun-totting bandits. Gabbar was not just evil. He rejoiced in it too -- a vicious and crazy dacoit who enjoyed slow torture. That's what made him so daunting. He was, perhaps, one of the earliest cold-blooded tyrants in Hindi cinema's history of villains. Since then his legacy has been carried forward with ferocious enthusiasm through reel-life criminals like Mogambo, Dr Dang, Kesariya Vilayti and Langda Tyagi.

Babban comes to an audience immune to gore, violence and persecution. No matter how hard AB dilates his pupils or growls like a Bengal tiger, he isn't creepy enough.

Going by the feedback in the theatre, Aag is bound to receive extreme reactions. But then, like I said earlier, RGV doesn't seem to care. You know what? Ditto.

* / *****


One star :o

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
I won't even glance over Taran Adarsh's review until I've seen the film (i.e., if I ever read it); I'm a bit too familiar with this special-ed. mother-fucker's tendency to spoil ever last, minute stinkin' plot detail -- :evil: .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
How did Moran rate sarkar?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
ali wrote:
Khiladi wrote:

2/5


Taran gives it a 2! That's the biggest indicator so far that this might be actually a decent movie! :lol:

Ali


Here you go mere bhaii!

Producer: Ram Gopal Varma
Director: Ram Gopal Varma
Starring: Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgan, Sushmita Sen, Urmila Matondkar, Mohanlal, Rajpal Yadav, Nisha Kothari, Prashant Raj, Gaurav Kapur, Sushant Singh, Abhishek Bachchan, Suchitra Krishnamurthy, Sachin
Music: Ganesh Hegde, Amar Mohile, Prasana Shekhar, Nitin Raikwar
Lyrics: Shabbir Ahmed, Sajid, Farhad, Sarim Momin, Nitin Raikwar
Genre: Action
Recommended Audience: Parental Guidance
Film Released on: 31 August 2007
Reviewed by: Akshay Shah
Reviewer's Rating: 4.0 / 10
Posters
Public Rating Average: 8 / 10 (rated by 4 viewers)
Give your Rating:
Email this page
Save this page to your local hard disk!
Print this page
When Ram Gopal Varma decided to remake SHOLAY I was sceptical; the film is the epitome of 70’s masala cinema and undeniably an outright classic. To this day, SHOLAY remains a film which remains firmly etched in my memory scene for scene, character to character and dialogue to dialogue. However when Ram Gopal Varma later said in interviews that his version was a mere homage to the genre that evolved as a result of SHOLAY and not a direct copy of SHOLAY by any means, I was somewhat relieved as Varma had done a superlative homage earlier with his immensely entertaining SARKAR which was adapted from the classic THE GODFATHER.

So does RAM GOPAL VARMA KI AAG live up to expectations? Does the movie pay a homage to not only the original SHOLAY but to the entire 70’s and 80’s “masala” action genre? Being brutally honest, NO! The movie is a colossal letdown and quiet easily one of the biggest disappointments I’ve seen in recent years.

The story of the movie hasn’t been credited to anyone as the entire storyline is almost identical to SHOLAY; sure the sequence of the scenes have changed, the contemporary setting of the movie has changed, and a number of characters have been amended a little, but the basis of the story remains identical. Inspector Narsimha (Mohanlal) hires two street smart goons Heero (Ajay Devgan) and Raj (Prashant Raj) to exact revenge on the man who ruined his entire life and killed his entire family; a man who rules over the town of Kaliganj with an iron fist by unleashing terror and mayhem. The man in question, is Babban Singh (Amitabh Bachchan), Mumbai’s number one underworld kingpin. How Heero and Raj put an end to Babban’s terror and how Narsimha extracts his revenge on Babban forms the crux of the movie. Along the way there is some romance as Heero falls in love with the tomboyish, loud-mouthed taxi-driver Ghungroo (Nisha Kothari) while Raj develops a soft spot for a widow Durga (Sushmita Sen) who used to be married to Narsimha’s brother.

The screenplay by Rahil Qazi is a mere cut and paste job at it’s worst with some of the sequences in the movie being moved around in a different order, but the entire structure of the movie stays exactly the same, and almost all of the important scenes remain in the movie minus any form of impact. The movie starts off on a slow note, and the sequences with Rambha Bhai (Rajpal Yadav at his absolute worst) gyrate on the viewers nerves. The flashback sequence where we find out how Heero and Raj met Narsimha is absolutely pathetic. From there on the rest of the movie basically follows the exact same plot line as SHOLAY.

The climax is the biggest culprit and comes as the rudest shock in the entire venture. The movie ends so suddenly without any impact at all. The climax of the original SHOLAY remains etched in the viewer’s memory as Thakur takes on Gabbar one-on-one.

As a director, Ram Gopal Varma has clearly lost the plot here. The characters poorly shadows of the originals in SHOLAY and the impact of the characters have been diluted for the most. Varma relies entirely on the public’s memory of the original characters in SHOLAY to help see his characters through; however this doesn’t work as he has also changed his characters to an extent, and again the effort is simply confused.

Any redeeming factors? Well, yes! Individual scenes in the movie stand out e.g. the introduction of Babban, the face-off between Babban and Narsimha in their few scenes together. However these scenes are too few and far in between to really leave a mark and there certainly weren’t enough of them. Also Babban’s reaction at the death of his brother and Tambhe are superb. The dialogues by Farhad-Sajid are good on the whole, except those delivered by Babban which are just fantastic.

Amitabh Bachchan stepping doing a take-off on Gabbar Singh raised a lot of eye brows and a lot of speculations. However, Bachchan does the unthinkable and makes Babban Singh a character of his own stepping out of the shadows of Gabbar Singh. This performance works simply because Amitabh has been very careful not to imitate or copy Amjad Khan’s legendary performance in any way, shape or format. Right from Babban’s fantastic entry Bachchan lends the character the right amount of energy, menace and surprisingly humour which makes the character work. His larger-than-life persona, electric screen-presence, powerful and original body language and amazing delivery and diction are put to full use and Bachchan clearly gives this role all that he’s got within the confines of what he’s been given and he comes out with flying colours.

The movie lights up for the better every time he’s on screen and his performance is truly an enjoyable one as he plays the evil Babban with absolute relish and passion. The dark humour, the hilarious one-liners, and his sadistic nature combined elevate not only the character but the entire movie as without a doubt Amitabh Bachchan is one of the biggest USP’s of the movie, and this is a performance that surely deserved a better film.

Mohanlal is the perfect choice for this part. His looming presence, powerful eyes and expressive delivery are in sync with the character of Narsimha. However again, Varma has made a fundamental flaw. Varma has missed the point of revenge and his vendetta takes a backseat in the second half. Unlike Sanjeev Kumar in SHOLAY, Lal hasn’t been given enough mettle to really sink his teeth into (despite been given some of the same like as Thakur in SHOLAY e.g. “loha garam hai”) and shine and this is a total disappointment.

Ajay Devgan springs a surprise. In a role which is completely against the type of characters Devgan usually plays, he enacts his part with utmost confidence and conviction and comes out flying colours. His get-up is fabulous, and his delivery spot-on. However it’s Devgan’s comic scenes which leave the viewer surprised as he comes across as natural as ever and hits all the right notes evoking laughter and relief at the right moments. Be it the scene where he pretends to be the “baba” or the infamous scene where he does the big “naatak”.

Prashant Raj makes an extremely confident debut. The boy has a striking screen presence, looks good on-screen, has a fantastic voice (though monotone at times) and delivers his lines with utmost confidence. He holds his own against a cast of veterans which is a big enough compliment and leaves his own mark. The chemistry he shares with Devgan is good too (though there’s not enough of it), though not a patch on Jai and Veeru.

Sushmita Sen is restrained, and the she delivers a completely natural performance which is perfect for the part she is playing. There is a lack of chemistry between her and Prashant who simply looks too young to be opposite Sushmita, but thankfully their relationship is not the run-of-mill stuff either.

Nisha Kothari does well in her initial sequences, though after a point her performance starts to gyrate as it comes across as artificial and too forced. Her delivery is poor, and though she tries her absolute hardest here, her biggest fault is that she tries too hard. To give her credit, she does look cute as a button and is consistent throughout. There is a lack of chemistry between her and Ajay which doesn’t help proceedings either.

Sushant Singh doesn’t have much to do here and fails to leave much of a mark. Rajpal Yadav gives his most irritating performance to date. Virendra Saxena is excellent. His scenes are fantastic. Gaurav Kapoor is good. Ravindra Kale is okay. Sanjay Navrekar doesn’t have much to do. Chakravarthy and Suchitra Krishnamurthi play their small parts well. Sachin fails to leave a mark in his small role.

The music in the movie is plain below average. The ‘Ruk Jaa’ track is catchy, but nothing great. The ‘Holi’ song has been well captured but the tune is a total letdown. The sole redeeming factor musically is the ‘Mehbooba’ track. The entire track has been superbly canned; the choreography by Ganesh Hedge is stunning and Urmila Mantondkar looks absolutely gorgeous here. Abhishek Bachchan is alright in a small part; though not a patch on Jalal Agha who did a far better job as Abhishek’s “cool” persona just doesn’t work here.

Amar Mohile’s background score is effective on the whole, though one wishes it wasn’t so jarring at times. Also Varma’s penchant for repeating the same background score he used in SARKAR seems shoddy.

Technically, the movie is surprisingly average for a RGV film. Amit Roy’s camerawork is good, though it’s the usual stuff he does for Varma and it’s becoming a bit overdone. Pradyuman Kumar’s action is completely uninspired. Varma’s aim was to capture the “feel” of those action films from the 80’s and he manages to do that but for the worst. The action is devoid of any excitement, and all the gun fights are a bore to watch. The worst culprits are Amit Parmar and Nitin Gupta who make an absolute mess out of the editing. It looks tacky.

In a nutshell, RAM GOPAL VARMA KI AAG is a colossal disappointment! Ardent fans of Amitabh Bachchan, Mohanlal or Ajay Devgan should catch this once, but on DVD only. With this movie, it’s evident that Ramu’s indulgence has finally got the better off him and it’s high time the man sat down and had a long (very long) hard think: the “factory” needs to go on “strike”!



4/10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Ram Gopal Varma ki.. Aargh!

Raja Sen | August 31, 2007 14:12 IST









It's kinda fitting that Gabbar is now called Babban.

Because Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag, ladies and gentlemen, as its title suggests, is a B-movie. It's like one of those TLV Prasad films of the 1990s that revels in its mediocrity, the kind of film that wouldn't normally get a theatrical release in Mumbai except for the stray morning show in a ramshackle single screen theatre.

Except that this time it's a Ram Gopal Varma movie, a mega-hyped vehicle of gimmick and bluster, and thanks to the casting decision of Amitabh Bachchan [Images] as the film's villain, occasionally elevated to, well, a Big-B-movie.

A B-movie, of course, can still be a work of art. As a filmmaker, you can choose to embrace the unreal, overdone style of (seemingly) slipshod filmmaking for its very lack of boundaries and aesthetics rather than against, directing inside the tacky box and painting everything super-bad with a delicious layer of postmodern irony -- in short, something so bad it's good.

This is how I chose to watch the new film, deciding that it's about the glory of unashamed hamming and the joy of the larger-than-life. I sat back, winced in the uber-badness of it all, and managed to actually survive through the first half. I can't say I liked it -- I doubt anybody can, really -- but it left me with some hopes of exciting action setpieces or interesting confrontation moments.

Post-interval, I failed. I really, really wanted to like Aag, to enjoy it for its sheer, (hopefully) contrived badness, but this was a dismal battle. This film is horrid beyond belief. Or redemption.

It's not that Ramu doesn't try. Varma's always been among the most excellent framers of a shot in the business, and here he goes funky and classic at the same time. Making cinematographer Amit Roy constantly tilt his lens at our actors, going from Sushmita Sen's [Images] dupatta to Mohanlal's beard in one fell, overemotional swoop aided by great angles and a constant movement. Even Ramu's ever-intriguing camera has never seemed this dynamic, often idiosyncratic here as he whimsically follows the trajectory of an apple here, a corpse there.

It's just that he doesn't really have anything to shoot. A lazily written half-baked script is overcompensated by the one man most responsible for single-handedly crippling a large part of RGV's oeuvre, Amar Mohile. The background-score man is in characteristically painful form, hitting constant ear-splitting melodrama as a bunch of non-actors are given a heavy load, while those sharing a half-dozen National Awards between themselves (Mohanlal 4, Ajay Devgan [Images] 2) are trapped by caricatures. Which aren't even remotely inventive.

And then there's Amitabh Bachchan. His Babban Singh (it's really hard not to giggle at all of the character names) is a uniquely twisted individual, with onebrown-onegreen eyes like an erstwhile Bausch & Lomb model, limping menacingly in combat boots and a military jacket. He's initially engaging, turning the cliche around to paraphrase immortal lines with brevity, and putting himself on the line during a compelling game of Russian roulette. Bachchan gamely gets into the character, slithering and hissing as he readies to strike fear in the hearts of faraway crying kids and policeman's wives.

While Amitabh does indeed provide commendable steam to the sinking ship, Babban is so over-written it hurts. He does superbly with a one-liner and a piece of fruit, but the frantic anxiety to make him Bollywood's greatest ever villain is all too visible as the character is loaded with bizarre lines about America and Al Qaeda [Images]. And let's not forget the Osama nod, with Babban suddenly cloaked in black a la Skeletor. Add to this a snaky tongue, a laugh that can't choose between ominous shudders and raspy hisses, and a Castor/Pollux complex that obviously stems more from Face/Off than Greek mythology.

Amitabh conjures up some great moments, but he was a better villain in Aks [Images].

Mohanlal is the film's protagonist, Narsimha, an improbably overweight encounter cop with a justifiable vendetta against Babban. He's a fine, restrained actor but despite a Hindi accent to rival Inspector Cousteau, is made to speak entirely in farcical, formulaic tripe. The best of performers would struggle, and this man -- certainly among the finest Indian living actors -- seems to give up the chase for greatness halfway through. I would, however, like to know how to throw a steak knife without using your fingers.

The rest of the characters, well, the lesser said the better. Surprisingly, newbie Prashant Raj [Images] emerges as the most tolerable of the bunch, but then again his role simply requires him to look, well, tall. Sen dresses in black and pretends to be stoic but constantly cries, looking like she's auditioning for Vaastu Shastra [Images] 2. Rajpal Yadav pipes up with a comic act limited to squeakily plugging Varma's next release. Sushant Singh plays a valiant Tambhe. Abhishek Bachchan [Images] chubbily comes on in a one-song cameo, with Urmila Matondkar [Images], the latter forcing Babban to utter the most gimmicky line ever.

Special criticism must be reserved for Devgan and Nisha Kothari [Images], who play Heero and Ghungroo. In one of current cinema's worst leading pairs, Ajay unfathomably plumbs new depths of idiocy with this follow-up to Cash. Kothari can't act -- or look remotely good -- but has acres of script-space, and has to explore everything from comic timing to hysterical weeping, which isn't a smart script choice. As Devgan pulls a pistol to his head to make suicide threats, we sorely wish he'd pull the trigger.

Ram Gopal Varma might have started out -- I see no better explanation -- to make a so-bad-it's-good kinda B-movie, but tragically hurtled past the stop-signs and ended up with, quite simply, a so-so-bad film. It's the director's most depressingly disappointing work.

Ramu is a maverick, a director usually given to laughing at critics and scathing reviews, which is as it should be. The scary thing is that he might just truly believe Aag is a good movie. I pray not.

Rediff Rating:


1/5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
I just watched AAG, and I don't know what to say.

As a remake, it's probably the biggest embarrassment in the history of cinema.
As a film in its own right, it's probably amongst the 10 crappiest ever.

It's out of its depth and is truly Ram Gopal Verma Ki SHALLOW

Saving grace? The Mehbooba number which is picturized and presented very well.

Biggest irritants:
1. Everything is so rushed -- even then the length seems intolerably long.
2. Amitabh's pure white teeth don't gel with his getup -- yes, he's hammed to glory and is more of a caricature.

Guys, this is not a Sholay remake or even a copy -- It's actually a parody.

No, it's not a metro-take on the great movie, it's a "chawl" version -- there's simply no sense of scope and scape.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:51 pm 
on AVS there was one guy who described Aag as too painful to watch with a disgusted look on his face. i pretty much expected it was going to be downer. not going to bother seeing this.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Even people who are wanting to see the movie are being turned away :o My brother was telling me he tried to go and watch it at the Bradford Cineworld but was turned away as the late showing had been cancelled because they had only got a single print of the movie :?

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
I typically value the reviews at fullhyd.com

Quote:

Aag 1 out of 5 stars




Before I get to the business of analyzing Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag, let me state that this film is by far not the worst film you can or will see this year. This is also not as bad as the worst of movies that somehow escape our radar. There may be other films that are technically worse or more painful to sit through, but none of them bring their suckiness together in the way that Ram Gopal Varma has managed to do here.

There’s something else that I must assure some of you: some might think that my opinion of this film is colored by a direct comparison to the original (Sholay, if you have been living in a cave). That much is untrue. First, they can’t make an ‘updated’ version of a classic and not expect to be compared, and second, Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag would have been detestable drivel even if Ramesh Sippy had never made a film in his life.

But while we are talking about Sippy’s film, it is interesting to see how much Varma doesn’t understand about the original. While Sippy wanted to make an entertaining Western, with top action and writing talents to make it a pack a punch, Varma is content with a mood piece and caricatures prancing about his interesting camera angles. Sippy was never bigger than Sholay, while Ramu wants to own Aag.

Varma lets go of the 70mm largesse of Sholay, and opts for his favorite upclose gritty Mumbai underworld look and feel. I have to give him and his art director credit in that they’ve created an atmosphere in Babban’s lair and his domain that is both repulsive and creepy. Unfortunately it’s a cartoonish one, and falls flat under close inspection.

The narrative suffers from the same uneven handling, and so we have Inspector Narsimha (Mohanlal as Thakur) out for revenge against Babban (Amitabh Bachchan as Gabbar), recruiting two street thugs Heero (Ajay Devgan as Veeru) and Raj (Prashant Raj as Jai), in a narrative structure which confuses and alarms us at regular intervals. You have to see Devgan in a red bushy moustache and Mohanlal in army tights trying to be ‘undercover’ to believe that alarming is truly what I’d describe it as.

The writing is so terrible, in fact, that at best, the film’s dialog has clever sounding re-interpretations of Sholay’s crackerjack stuff, and at worst it is bland and unremarkable to the extent that you don’t care what the characters are mouthing at all. Of course there are ‘updates’ to the way scenes are written or presented in the narrative thread, but nary a hint of originality in any of it. Everything here is sendback to the original film. However, literal-mindedness rules here. The verve behind the immortal scenes and dialog is waylaid in favor of lines that come off as gimmicky.

Time we talked about Gabbar, don’t you think?

There’s a scene in the film where Babban cuts off Narsimha’s (no, not hands) fingers. The build up to the actual event is note perfect and Bachchan gives a fantastic performance for that scene alone. It’s a visceral scene, and it’s scary because we’re not seeing some angry outburst, but rather a maniac take a very calculated step from messed up old man to cold-hearted torturer. At this point I began to think that maybe Ramu’s new take on the classic could have something to add.

But he wasn’t going to let me have that satisfaction, and in the second half the film plunges into an over-the-top, hammy Babban, who with his army fatigues, Al Qaeda references and all, remains just a cartoon friggin’ character. Up to this point the film has been annoying and disinteresting; from here on it’s actively boring. Since that's the entire second half of the film, it's hard not to walk away feeling disappointed about the return of Gabbar Singh. Gone is the mystique and wonder, and in its place is utter distaste of the pretenders.

There’s a lot more to complain – the continuity is horrific, the film is without suspense or tension, and the background score is so loud I have a slight hum in my ears still. Characters are introduced who will only have interest for people who remember those characters from Sholay, but while then they had actual personalities, here they just hang around waiting for their turn to get killed. The worst part is, you don’t care anymore.

Not helping matters is the cast. Newcomer Prashant is confident though a little bland, and Sushmita bravely does whatever she can to give depth to her flat character. Mohanlal has terrible Hindi but solid acting chops, and hey, that’s a good thing. And while Amitabh is the one who tries the hardest to make it work, he is let down by the writing, and Varma’s overindulgence. Devgan and Kothari are the biggest criminals, as they chew up most of the screen space, and deliver the worst performances you will see this year.

This so-called ‘update’ of Sholay mistakes violence for thrills and weird camera angles (including one that is stuck to Kothari’s bottom) for character development. It’s the kind of film that makes you want to visit Ramu in the editing room and find out just what he was thinking when he saw this ridiculous footage.

Speaking objectively without thinking of Sholay, Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag is a terrible film. As a remake of the classic, it’s a crime against humanity. Ultimately, some classics don’t need to be remade because there is no room for improvement. Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag proves it for all intent and purposes. I can’t imagine sitting through this garbled, poorly thought-out mess ever again. I can only urge you not to make the same mistake as me and to stay away from Aag at all costs. Rent Sholay and watch it again, instead.

Samrat Sharma


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
what is it with the EXTREME ratings? it can't possibly be that bad, could it? or is there some sort of bias against this film to begin with? :roll:

DragunR2--haha--I wouldn't be too surprised--anyway, that IS JD Chakravarthy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
Quote:
By Martin D'Souza, Bollywood Trade News Network Send to Friend



View Ram Gopal Varma Ke Aag Movie Stills

View Ram Gopal Varma Ke Aag Movie Stills
For the first 30 minutes you wonder what’s happening on screen. There’s no direction, there’s no script (of course it’s a remake of SHOLAY, we all know) but the way Ramu goes about introducing the characters of Ajay Devgan and his buddy is stuff made by novices. And this is a RGV flick! Then there’s Rajpal Yadav’s annoying act with a put-on accent. After that you know where this AAG is headed. It’s a blaze, and Ramu and gang desperately try to quell the fire using Amitabh Bachchan (Baban) who meekly tries to blow with his parted lips in an effort to scare the daylights off you!!!

Ghungroo (Nisha Kothari) arrives on screen with her auto and straight away tries to take-off in top gear while Ajay Devgan and Prashant Raj sttuter and start. There’s also Sushmita Sen who has an expression which says, ‘I don’t know how I got caught in this fire’!

It’s such torture to sit through the movie that it made a dud like CASH look better. The music is passable and dialogues lack the finesse and punch. If Gabbar’s ‘Kitne Aadmi The’ line still rings loud and clear, Babban has not a single line to shout about. If Gabbar’s mannerisms terrorized Thakur and his villagers, Narsima looks Babban straight in the eye. If Samba was a perfect side-kick for Gabbar, Tambhe is a character caught in a fix. If Basanti rocked, Ghungroo annoys. And if Helen’s dance in Mehbooba Mehbooba was class personified, Urmila Matondkar does not even come close to it.




Forgive me for the comparison with such a classic as SHOLAY, but comparisons are a must when it’s a remake. If Bally Sagoo could immortalize the song Chura Liya from the film YAADON KI BARAAT and re-introduce it to today’s generation with his classic remix, Ramu with his remake of SHOLAY has shown how a parody should be made for Television.

Sorry Ramu, Babban does not work. I just wonder how you now plan to quell this fire. Or will you now sing Billy Joel’s famous song “We didn’t start the fire…”

Don’t get caught in this fire!


Ratings : 1/5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AAG
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
Aag is maha thandee


Last edited by newDEEP [go-green] on Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 450 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 30  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group