manono wrote:
Professional encoders are far better than PC based cheap solutions.
I hope you're talking about Hi-Def encoding, because that's certainly not true of encoding for Standard-Def DVD.
HD was the issue in the context.
Quote:
Maybe hardware encoders of the kind that Hollywood uses. But I have yet to see an Indian DVD that I couldn't do a better job with encoding on my computer.
? What's your point? I did not say Indian DVDs are (not) encoded with professional encoders.
Quote:
Just as an example, I reencoded Don as 23.976fps progressive with 2:3 pulldown and did away with those stupid duplicate frames. And aren't you the same fellow who said this about the Don DVD before ever having seen it:
Quote:
I doubt that. The HD is much better for DON than for Lakshya. I have seen parts of the uncompressed 2K master from hard disk digitally projected at 1080p and it looked GREAT. The DVD is made from the HD.
Your statements are meaningless. A lot can happen (and did) between the master and the retail DVD. Here are a couple of frames from the DVD I happened to come across:
Your statements about color are meaningless as long as you don't have the master for reference. Yes, a lot can happen. But where is your evidence that the color is wrong except that you think it is wrong?
Quote:


Those are from 1:29 and 1:55 of the song Mourya Re.
Quote:
I watched the whole DVD and apart from the awful frame repetition and sometimes some compression issues this is technically as good as a good Hollywood quality DVD.
And that's demonstrably false. As long as Indian DVD production companies use cheap and/or obsolete encoders, with nothing available except the Standard and MPEG Standard quantisation matrices (Don uses the Standard Matrix), then there's not one Indian DVD that can be mentioned in the same breath as even a mediocre Hollywood DVD. Don, with those dupe frames, is so far below even average Indian DVDs, that the less said in its defense the better.
What do you think I was referring to when I said "compression issues"?? I also saw that this song looked noisy, but the whole film does not look like this. And I already said the duplicate frames are very bad. My point was that when you ignore the duplicate frames and the compression issues during some fast motion this is one of the best Indian DVDs and it is comparable to good Hollywood DVDs. The reason is that it is direct digital from the HD and DI. I can't see what is wrong about that statement. But since you seem to have such a strong opinion about the issues why don't you tell us where you are coming from? Do you work in video compression?