It is currently Fri Sep 26, 2025 8:21 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 210 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
No proof is needed to convincea Believer.
No Proof is enough to a Skeptic.
Wise judge via reasoning.

---------------------------

Of course this topic has been discussed here on zulm many many times in the past. Same topic surfaces again as there are new zulmies who are/ were not aware of previous threads. Ali and SunntSaharanAudit did contributed a lot on this topic before. As I recall, consensus was that SHOLAY was shot on 1.45:1. I did not bring in this 1.45:1 (and/ or 1.66:1 or 1.37:1) AR, so as not to parachute another controversy in this thread as it's close enough to 1.33:1.

I also vaguely recall, sunnyaudit and/ or Ali mentioning that 1.45:1 or 1.66:1, whatever the case may be, could also have been shot on 65 mm film (not 70 mm)??

Anyway, it's not un-common to shoot on 35 mm and blow it up on 70 mm. Recall MONSOON WEDDING that was shot using 16mm cameras and film and released on 35mm (don't ask me for proof, it's a common knowledge, widely reported in English media, and also stated by the producers). Now, no one stopping them to blow it up further to 70 mm or even I-max.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:11 pm
Posts: 579
sweetfriend wrote:
When Sholay was released initially it was advertised that it was shot in 70mm--


ali wrote:
ImageAli


It just says "70mm Stereophonic Sound".
IIRC it didn't have term "Shot in 70mm" in any poster.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
sweetfriend wrote:
What this gang is trying to persue is that the producers made false statements-Why was it not questioned at that time.Or is it just RANA_ARSH et DRAGUN trying to regain their lost glory..


1) Arsh hasn't posted in this thread as yet.
Dragun and Rana disagree on many points.
Wow, what a gang, fighting among themselves.

2) Glory, what glory. Only acknowledgement expected and received is insults. Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: actually
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
Actually, the poster says "70 mm AND Stereophonic Sound" ;-)

That said, let's not get personal... Sholay, in all formats, is religion :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
sweetfriend wrote:
Is there a disagreement on this thread--
Argument does not hold.
How successful was the gang warfare on the BEI thread.Even the BEI dvds freeze..Come on gang wake up and smell the coffee


Disagreements/ different point of view can be expressed without being combative. Read betwwen the lines and see which AR I prefer and which AR DragunR2 prefers ?? There are other instances too.

Too bad that you assumed that 'either or' Rana, Arsh, DragunR2, others, were defending DEI/ BEI. I know for myself, Yes I have always admired most of DEI/ BEI Progressive DVDs and reported/ complained lots of DEI/ BEI freezing DVDs. And, look who is all gaga about excellent service from DEI/ BEI that BEI sent you many of those replacements.
sweetfriend wrote:
wake up and smell the coffee

If you are inviting me for a coffee, I sure will drop by when in your area. I try not to hold any grudges. Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: actually
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
Some fresh Java Coffee for everyone:
NewDeep wrote:
Actually, the poster says "70 mm AND Stereophonic Sound" ;-)

Here goes the first cup ;) served straight from dvdtimes -- I am not saying this is FACT, but yes, it's proof from another site of the belief in only a 35mm shoot of Sholay...

http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=58178

Quote:
Sholay was India's first 70mm widescreen film and also boasted stereophonic sound. However, since actual 70mm cameras were deemed too expensive to be used to shoot the epic actioner, the movie instead was shot on traditional 35mm film and the 4:3 picture was subsequently blown up, cropped and matted to a 2.20:1 frame. This also proved cost-effective in that separate 35mm prints would be needed anyway since few theatres in India were equipped to show widescreen films.

Now, here's where the complications set in. In the weeks leading up to Sholay's premiere, India's censor board revealed that they were refusing to clear the film for release as they objected to its violent final scene and ordered director Ramesh Sippy to shoot a more 'sanitised' climax if he wanted his hard work to make it to the cinema halls...
The original, unedited cut of the film finally saw the light of day in 1990 on a British VHS release taken from a 35mm open matte print (the 70mm negatives for the director's version are no longer in usable condition) and, unfortunately, it is from this same video source that Eros have brought Sholay in its uncensored form to DVD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: kafi maza aaya
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
While the coffee invitations go around, let me post a poser,

Does your DVD (Eros, DEI, Ultra, Carlotta) or VHS or any other media have Amitabh saying the first line or the second line (when Dharam is trying to teach Hema how to shoot) ;-)

"Tatiya tope ke potay hai" << First

"James Bond ke potay hai’’. << Second

Try to remember what you heard in the theatre too ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: kafi maza aaya
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
sweetfriend wrote:
NewDeep wrote:
While the coffee invitations go around, let me post a poser,

Does your DVD (Eros, DEI, Ultra, Carlotta) or VHS or any other media have Amitabh saying the first line or the second line (when Dharam is trying to teach Hema how to shoot) ;-)

"Tatiya tope ke potay hai" << First

"James Bond ke potay hai’’. << Second

Try to remember what you heard in the theatre too ;-)

I do remember the scene but has to depend on Subtitles so miss lots of the dialogue.Also when this movie was hown in the theatre it was always sold out with most of the audience cheering.Watching movies was more a social thing plus leaving the cinema at intervals etc etc....
Some people may be aware of this, others may be surprised to know that Amitabh says both the dialogues BUT in separate prints ;-)

This is one reason why a whole lot of people believe that Sholay was actually shot in both 35mm and 70mm... with each scene shot twice... now that's truly hard to digest, but then with Divecha the perfectionist, who knows?...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: kafi maza aaya
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2001 4:11 pm
Posts: 579
NewDeep wrote:
While the coffee invitations go around, let me post a poser,

Does your DVD (Eros, DEI, Ultra, Carlotta) or VHS or any other media have Amitabh saying the first line or the second line (when Dharam is trying to teach Hema how to shoot) ;-)

"Tatiya tope ke potay hai" << First

"James Bond ke potay hai’’. << Second

Try to remember what you heard in the theatre too ;-)


I have Eros/DEI dvd, which has James Bond dialog, where as my friend has Sholay VHS (recorded from TV Asia channel), has Tatya Tope dialog.

I thought, James Bond/Tatya Tope dialog may have something to do with patent/trade mark issue in USA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
sweetfriend wrote:
Quote:
If you are inviting me for a coffee, I sure will drop by when in your area. I try not to hold any grudges. Thanks.

I do beleive you and I was not trying to offend you in any way.
You are welcome anytime-
By the way is the invitation mutual.


100% Open Invitation. Anytime.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: kafi maza aaya
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
VijayDinanathChavan wrote:
NewDeep wrote:
While the coffee invitations go around, let me post a poser,

Does your DVD (Eros, DEI, Ultra, Carlotta) or VHS or any other media have Amitabh saying the first line or the second line (when Dharam is trying to teach Hema how to shoot) ;-)

"Tatiya tope ke potay hai" << First

"James Bond ke potay hai’’. << Second

Try to remember what you heard in the theatre too ;-)


I have Eros/DEI dvd, which has James Bond dialog, where as my friend has Sholay VHS (recorded from TV Asia channel), has Tatya Tope dialog.

I thought, James Bond/Tatya Tope dialog may have something to do with patent/trade mark issue in USA.

No, the James Bond mention does not appear to have that connotation... dei was distributed in the u.s. too... so...

Anyways, this is proof that within the same version (Gabbar lives), there are still separate versions, or prints, or even separate negatives... there are other subtle differences too...

Here's a quote from this very site:

Quote:
'Sholay' grew from paper into plans, and it gained weight and size and ambition.The Sippy's wanted to make 'Sholay' the biggest and the best adventure film ever, and they would make no compromises. The traditional 35mm format, they felt, wouldn't do justice to their vision. They were aiming for epic grandeur. So a decision was made: 'Sholay' would be India's first 70mm film with stereophonic sound. The 70mm film format offered double the size. The major Hollywood action movies at the time, such as 'Mckenna's Gold', were shot in this format because it gave the viewer, quite literally, a big movie experience. But the decision to do 'Sholay' in this format added another layer of compliations. Shooting in 70mm wasn't easy. It required huge camera's which could take 70mm film. Importing the camera's was an expensive proposition. The most practical solution was to shoot on 35mm and then blow it up for 70mm. The format was screen-tested. Divecha suggested putting aground glass in front of the camera lens, on which Kamlakar Rao, a young but technically skilled cameraman, made markings so the margins of the 70mm frame could be identified. Ramesh's brother Ajit, who lived in London, forwarded the test to Paris, where a 70mm print was made. The print came back with further instructions on how to perfect the technique. A 70mm film also required bigger screens, and most theatres in India weren't equipped for it. The Sippy's decided to have two sets of negatives, one in 70mm and the other one in 35mm. In practical terms, this meant that every shot would have to be done twice. Each decision added to the cost.

http://www.zulm.net/raj_top100i.htm#num50


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
sweetfriend wrote:
Quote:
A 70mm film also required bigger screens, and most theatres in India weren't equipped for it. The Sippy's decided to have two sets of negatives, one in 70mm and the other one in 35mm. In practical terms, this meant that every shot would have to be done twice. Each decision added to the cost.

This explains why the movie was very different when it was shown at the city cinema after it completed its run at the contry one.
Explanation==
The contry cinema was in existence long before had smaller screen and had binding contracts with the distributers to have first release always.
The city cinema was newer with a larger screen and sterephonic sound and catered for the American or Brish films.
Sholay changed the future for both cinemas..


What'll you conclude when you consider a bit more of the same quote (hilited in bold):

Quote:
'Sholay' grew from paper into plans, and it gained weight and size and ambition.The Sippy's wanted to make 'Sholay' the biggest and the best adventure film ever, and they would make no compromises. The traditional 35mm format, they felt, wouldn't do justice to their vision. They were aiming for epic grandeur. So a decision was made: 'Sholay' would be India's first 70mm film with stereophonic sound. The 70mm film format offered double the size. The major Hollywood action movies at the time, such as 'Mckenna's Gold', were shot in this format because it gave the viewer, quite literally, a big movie experience. But the decision to do 'Sholay' in this format added another layer of compliations. Shooting in 70mm wasn't easy. It required huge camera's which could take 70mm film. Importing the camera's was an expensive proposition. The most practical solution was to shoot on 35mm and then blow it up for 70mm. The format was screen-tested. Divecha suggested putting aground glass in front of the camera lens, on which Kamlakar Rao, a young but technically skilled cameraman, made markings so the margins of the 70mm frame could be identified. Ramesh's brother Ajit, who lived in London, forwarded the test to Paris, where a 70mm print was made. The print came back with further instructions on how to perfect the technique. A 70mm film also required bigger screens, and most theatres in India weren't equipped for it. The Sippy's decided to have two sets of negatives, one in 70mm and the other one in 35mm. In practical terms, this meant that every shot would have to be done twice. Each decision added to the cost.


Double set of negative, 35mm and 70 mm doesn't neccessarily mean 'shot twice'. A single shot can be used to make two negatives for two different formats ?? It may very well have been shot twice, one with a 35 mm film and one with 70 mm film. But, in that case, background, picture coverage, skyscape, landscape etc sure would be different in the two versions. But I (someone else might have noticed, pl mention) didn't see any difference. For example, look at the smoke coming out of Train Steam Engine in the beginning shot in different versions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: hm
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
You are right Rana---it does not necessarily mean "shot twice," but then, we need to understand what the author means by "negative."

http://www.answers.com/topic/original-camera-negative

Quote:
The original camera negative (OCN) is the film in a motion picture camera which captures the original image. The size of a standard roll varies depending on the film gauge and whether or not a new roll, re-can, or short end was used. Typically the film lab will then assemble the camera rolls into lab rolls of 1200 to 1500 feet. Workprints may be made for viewing dailies or editing the picture on film. Once the picture has been "locked" in editing, a negative cutter will conform the negative using the keycode as a reference, cutting the OCN and any opticals, and cementing it together into several rolls. This is then quickly copied to create a safety backup print. At this point, an answer print will be created from the OCN, and upon its approval, interpositives (IPs) and internegatives (INs) are created, from which the release prints are made. Generally speaking, the OCN is considered too important and delicate to be used for any processes more than necessary, as each pass through a lab process carries the risk of further degrading the quality of the negative. Once an answer print is approved, the IPs and INs are regarded as the earliest generation of the finished and graded film, and are almost always used for transfers to video or new film restorations. The OCN is usually regarded as a last resort in the event that all of the intermediate elements have been compromised or lost. Ironically, the more popular a film is, the higher the likelihood that the original negative is in a worse shape, due to the need to return to the OCN in order to strike new IPs to replace the exhausted ones and thus create more INs and release prints.


As far as "no difference in landscape and engine smoke", the rumours are that except the action sequences, everything was shot twice.... rumours of course, but are they ;-)

http://www.mouthshut.com/review/Sholay-95823-1.html

Quote:
10. Interesting the film was shot both in 35mm and 70mm for two reasons. First - most of the theatres in india were 35mm and second - Blowing up 35mm to 70mm made no sense because it would effect the quality. So all the talkie scenes excpet the action ones were shot twice. Maybe thats why there r two versions of the dialogues when Amitabh says ’’ Tatiya tope ke pothe hai’’ and the other version ’’ James Bond ke pothe hai’’.
Plus, if the 70mm version indeed is different, how would we ever know how the smoke blew during 70mm shoot, because all DVDs seem to be from 35mm source ;) But then, none of this is proven... it's all mythology :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: hm
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
NewDeep wrote:
Plus, if the 70mm version indeed is different, how would we ever know how the smoke blew during 70mm shoot, because all DVDs seem to be from 35mm source ;) But then, none of this is proven... it's all mythology :-)


I'm not sure, but I thought that DEI-EROS and/ or other widescreen DVDs are from '70mm print' or from '70mm converted to 35 mm cinemascope' print ?? And, DVDs with 'open matt' are from 35 mm print. If this is true, smoke in starting scene should be different in 2 versions. But, then again if action scenes were shot only once, it'd be the same.

BTW, if shot only once, what OCN was used ?? Compatible with 70 mm or with 35 mm ??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: hm
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2776
Location: I N D I A
rana wrote:
I'm not sure, but I thought that DEI-EROS and/ or other widescreen DVDs are from '70mm print' or from '70mm converted to 35 mm cinemascope' print ??
I'm personally of the opinion that Sholay was shot once and converted to two prints - 70mm and 35mm, the normal screening being a little greater than 4:3... something like 1.66:1.

If you watch Sholay on any TV channel, or watch it on the Gold VHS, or Ultra DVD, etc., you'll never see the gauge mentioned as 70mm on the CBFC certificate... it's always 35mm. So, all DVDs seem to be sourced from the 35mm print(s) -- as we have seen, even within the same gauge, variations exist of the movie... the one exception is the "lost" alternate ending 35mm print... that made its entry into the market via a VHS tape recording - and which gave birth to B4U/Eros -- but again, 35mm. This, and the fact that 35mm gauge is shown in CBFC certificates, seems to point to the possibility that the 70mm print never got converted to DVD -- provided of course, that the 70mm print would have shown 70mm in the CBFC certificate.

In 2004, however, Rehmant Enterprises leased Sholay 70mm from Sippy and converted the 70mm print to a cinemascope edition... I have not seen that either so far on any DVD -- though I sometimes suspect Carlotta is from that source... but who knows for sure...?

Abt the OCN question, I really have no answers on Sholay... but how I wish we could get this info somewhere: Can't we make an online petition and request Ramesh Sippy to put the speculations to rest?

What do you say?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 210 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group