sweetfriend wrote:
Quote:
A 70mm film also required bigger screens, and most theatres in India weren't equipped for it. The Sippy's decided to have two sets of negatives, one in 70mm and the other one in 35mm. In practical terms, this meant that every shot would have to be done twice. Each decision added to the cost.
This explains why the movie was very different when it was shown at the city cinema after it completed its run at the contry one.
Explanation==
The contry cinema was in existence long before had smaller screen and had binding contracts with the distributers to have first release always.
The city cinema was newer with a larger screen and sterephonic sound and catered for the American or Brish films.
Sholay changed the future for both cinemas..
What'll you conclude when you consider a bit more of the same quote (hilited in bold):
Quote:
'Sholay' grew from paper into plans, and it gained weight and size and ambition.The Sippy's wanted to make 'Sholay' the biggest and the best adventure film ever, and they would make no compromises. The traditional 35mm format, they felt, wouldn't do justice to their vision. They were aiming for epic grandeur. So a decision was made: 'Sholay' would be India's first 70mm film with stereophonic sound. The 70mm film format offered double the size. The major Hollywood action movies at the time, such as 'Mckenna's Gold', were shot in this format because it gave the viewer, quite literally, a big movie experience. But the decision to do 'Sholay' in this format added another layer of compliations. Shooting in 70mm wasn't easy. It required huge camera's which could take 70mm film. Importing the camera's was an expensive proposition. The most practical solution was to shoot on 35mm and then blow it up for 70mm. The format was screen-tested. Divecha suggested putting aground glass in front of the camera lens, on which Kamlakar Rao, a young but technically skilled cameraman, made markings so the margins of the 70mm frame could be identified. Ramesh's brother Ajit, who lived in London, forwarded the test to Paris, where a 70mm print was made. The print came back with further instructions on how to perfect the technique. A 70mm film also required bigger screens, and most theatres in India weren't equipped for it. The Sippy's decided to have two sets of negatives, one in 70mm and the other one in 35mm. In practical terms, this meant that every shot would have to be done twice. Each decision added to the cost.
Double set of negative, 35mm and 70 mm doesn't neccessarily mean 'shot twice'. A single shot can be used to make two negatives for two different formats ?? It may very well have been shot twice, one with a 35 mm film and one with 70 mm film. But, in that case, background, picture coverage, skyscape, landscape etc sure would be different in the two versions. But I (someone else might have noticed, pl mention) didn't see any difference. For example, look at the smoke coming out of Train Steam Engine in the beginning shot in different versions.