It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:00 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 3:20 pm
Posts: 886
shivrk wrote:
...for the best movie critic in india, he's doing a very shitty job...Anyone agree?

Oh absolutely AGREE he ALWAYS does a shitty job...and absolutely disagree that he's the best critic in India....WHATEVER gave one that idea....

The best critic, albeit arguably, remains Khalid Mohammed. Not only does he write exceedingly wittily, he knows what he talks about. He tends to look favourably at his own personal likeables, such as AB, AB jr., Shahrukh Khan, Hrithik Roshan....but he is more or less pretty fair...in any case, if anyone is interested in film reviewing then they should begin following his stuff as the 101 in film critiquing.....for Bollywood stuff at least......

Here's a link to his reviews and happy reading.....it also includes the BOOM review.....wont tell what he thinks of BOOM, read it and find out :-D

http://web.mid-day.com/asp/columnsarchi ... d=741&st=0

PS: Also elsewhere on te Mid-Day site is a review by Aditya Bhattacharya too, that makes for interesting reading....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:38 pm
Posts: 408
Aarkayne wrote:
tends to look favourably at his own personal likeables, such as AB, AB jr., Shahrukh Khan, Hrithik Roshan....

That covers a lot of people and I dont know what AB Jr is doing in that list.

But you are right, he is the most onjective among the critics. He doesnt care about the boxoffice potential of a movie and he critques the movie rather than getting lost in the hype about the stars and the expense.

Well Boom sure got a rating off the scale :devil:




Edited By jag on 1064232523


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
izzy wrote:
did u watch the hindi version

I don't know if it was the Hindi version or the International version, but it was both in English and Hindi, so I believe it is the international version, though it appeared to be cut.

Khalid Mohammed as critic, maybe he is good, but being a critic you wouldn't have expected him to make all those mistakes in Fiza.

btw, did anyone notice the 'homage' or 'inspiration' (copy) from other films? The bank robbery looks like it was taken from the All Saints flop "Honest", the mexican stand-off between the 3 bhai's could be from either "Kaante" or "Reservoir Dogs", the end scene with the models on the on the island looks like "Charlie's Angels" and of course the "10" sequence was intentional.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:38 pm
Posts: 408
Fund this on the net. Apparently attributed to Judy Gerstel of The Toronto Star


Here's all you need to know to be a Critic

You've probably seen the ubiquitous "Dummies" guides at the bookstore,
perhaps even purchased one. Both "perennials for Dummies" and "Bridge
for Dummies" are on my bookshelves. Subtitled (And a Reference Guide
for the Rest of Us), the "Dummies" began as a phenomenally successful
series of guides to computer programs. Now, they seem to be expanding
to everything legal. There's "Sex for Dummies", "Weight Lifting for
Dummies", "Low Fat Cooking for Dummies" and "Cats for Dummies".

What there isn't: "Movie Criticism for Dummies".

Movie criticism is at least as popular as playing bridge, growing
perennials or training a cat to use the toilet. For one thing, movie
criticism requires only two people; doing it by yourself is possible but
unsatisfactory. Also, you don't need any supplies, creatures tools or
equipment for movie criticism (though, as for perennials, a heap of
organic fertilizer is beneficial). You don't even need a movie.
Millions of people, some of them in public, opine about a movie without
having seen it.


Next week, when the Toronto International Film Festival begins,
countless people in offices, at coffee shops and in private will be
engaging in consensual movie criticism.

"Movie Criticism For Dummies" seems like not just a good idea, but a
necessity.

Part 1: Getting Started

Don't worry about qualifications. Remember, movies are the subject
about which William Goldman said, "Nobody knows anything." Everybody
can be a movie critic. In fact, everybody is a movie critic. But it
does help if you can tell one genre from another. Generally, you don't
want to confuse melodrama with a comedy, although even people who make
movies sometimes confuse them.

Bear in mind that everything you see on screen is there to achieve an
effect, and as a movie critic, you don't watch the movie, you watch the
effects--including the overall effect--and evaluate how effective they
are.

Don't worry about plot. If it makes sense--not a given--ignore it.
Attention to plot is regarded as inferior movie criticism. Besides,
plots really aren't worth discussing because thre are only two plots: 1)
a stranger comes to town; 2)someone begins a journey.

Part 2: The Pitfalls

Avoid verb constructions beginning with the first person. Saying "I
really really liked (loved, loathed, etc.)" a movie doesn't cut it as
movie criticism. Instead of describing your reaction, describe what you
find in the movie. For example, "I found 'Gummo' (a Festival movie from
the director of 'Kids' corrosive;" or "I found 'The Sweet Hereafter'
(Atom Egoyan's picture opening the festival) gloomy."

Other ways to describe what you find in movies that will make
eavesdroppers in restaurants take note include "trivial", "emotionally
naked" and "lyrical". When you are stuck, go for "peculiar" or
"provocative". Then, when you become more experienced, emboldened or
drunk, attempt "noirish", "fascistic" or "fetishistic". Avoid them when
you're really drunk.

Never gush.

Don't fail to mention the look of the picture. Luminous? Painterly?

Never quote the critical blurbs in movie ads, particularly if they're by
radio or TV people, Roger Ebert included. Roger Ebert especially.

Part 3: Gaining Mastery

Now start tossing around your ideas and opinions about structure,
framing, perspective and palette.

After everyone else has had a say, ask, with raised eyebrow, "And the
point of it was...?"

Tell people you're more interested in visual expression than narrative,
which is generally weak--no, make that facile--these days.

Wow 'em with the contrary position. For example, "'Ishtar' was
hilarious; the studio system produced mediocre movies; 'Citizen Kane' is
a bore."

Find an obscure foreign-language film at the festival, preferably
Russian and plotless, and say the filmically it's the best thing you've
seen all year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:28 am
Posts: 1373
Location: London, UK
Having seen the film I felt it was a major let down after Kaizad's Bombay Boyz. The production values and some of the characters was top quality, but the overall film tends to bog down half way due too its pacing.

Still a good attempt to offer the world of Bollywood and its audiences something new...certainly one of the best Indian film I've seen this year!

Also have to big up the Big B for his performance as the Big Don, I don't care what anyone says...he is still the number one actor of Indian cinema...original and creative!!!

Ps) I actually believe that younger audeinces (14 - 21) will love this film more :) for its "openess" look at sex and violence. Not for the folk who like conventional films like Main Prem Ki Diwani Hoon or K3G!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 1:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 12:38 am
Posts: 435
Shahran Sunny Audit wrote:
Ps) I actually believe that younger audeinces (14 - 21) will love this film more :) for its "openess" look at sex and violence. Not for the folk who like conventional films like Main Prem Ki Diwani Hoon or K3G!!!!

I like both types myself. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
The BEST REVIEW SO FAR!

Boom

Producer: Ayesha Shroff
Director: Kaizad Gustad
Starring: Amitabh Bachchan, Jackie Shroff, Javed Jaffri, Zeenat Aman, Gulshan Grover, Madhu Sapre, Padma Lakshmi, Katrina Kaif
Music: Talvin Singh and Sandeep Chowta
Lyrics: N/A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Genre: Thriller
Recommended Audience: Adult
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Released on: September 19, 2003
Approximate Running Time: 130 minutes Reviewed by: Shashi Matta


Reviewer's Rating: 1 out of 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative Rating: 5.5 out of 10
Rated by: 4 unique users

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


DUPE (verb): to deceive someone; (synonyms): cheat, trick, con, hoodwink, swindle.

First thing first. It is difficult to remember being this overwhelmingly cheated by any cinematic enterprise in the twenty-something years of my affair with the movies. BOOM is as shameless an exhibition of the sheer paucity of filmmaking ideas as it is of the brazen laundering of talent and filmmaking resources. Mr. Gustad, if you did have 18 crore rupees as pocket money from the Hindujas and their ilk, this is what you should have done (in no particular order, so you have some flexibility):



Buy yourself insurance against insanity (which in your world you probably call creativity): Rs. 1 crore
Donate Rs. 1 crore to the "Save Amitabh" fund (I will elaborate on this one later)
Spend Rs. 16 crore to finance each of Nagesh Kukunoor’s and Aparna Sen’s next feature film (arguably the best works to emerge from Bollywood this past year are Teen Deewarein and Mr. & Mrs. Iyer). Ms. Sen and Mr. Kukunoor would probably end up making two movies each with that kind of money. Oh what a treat that would indeed be!
Buy yourself a DVD of Manoj Shyamalan’s Unbreakable and go right to the special features where the director shows clips from home movies he made when he was a teenager. Each of those 2-3 min clips is probably a far superior example of amateur filmmaking than your 130-minute mess of a second film. And no, I didn’t forget that you would have no money left from the 18 crores to buy this DVD. This will be a gift from me to you. Just ask.

Positioned as a ‘dark comedy’ that links Mumbai’s glitzy fashion world with Dubai’s menacing underworld, BOOM generated soaring expectations among the audience and perhaps even filmmakers in Mumbai’s cliché-ridden film industry. What I am most curious about, however, is Mr. Gustad’s expectations from this appalling venture. He surely must have had some grandiose illusions. Did he think he was India’s answer to Quentin Tarantino? Or that he was single-handedly creating a sexual revolution in Indian cinema? Or perhaps that he was showcasing Indian cinema in the international arena? Whatever it was that he was expecting, BOOM only propels his illusions towards an inevitable crash-landing.

Here’s the plot for those who are still interested in knowing the gory details. A powerful underworld operation smuggles diamonds across countries, abetted by fashion models. In a catwalk-turned-catfight between two models, 30 antique diamonds are spilled from a model’s hair during a fashion show, to be lapped up by all and sundry. While the model who spills them goes underground, the model whose fight unwittingly foiled the plan, Anu Gaikwad (a tired looking, over-her-prime Madhu Sapre), and her two fashion model roomates Sheila Bardez (saucy-looking but non-talented Padma Lakshmi) and Rina Kaif (debutante dumb-belle Katrina Kaif) get caught in the web of the dons who were supposed to get the diamonds. The dons have a well-established hierarchy: Chote Mia (coke snorting Jackie Shroff with a hideously obvious hair-weave and highly affected dialogue delivery) aka Abdul 50-50 manages the Mumbai operations, Medium Mia (Gulshan Grover in the most underdeveloped character in the film, not that it would have mattered anyway) is the operations manager and younger brother to the big boss in Dubai, and Bade Mia (silver haired, sexily-evil- looking but utterly wasted clad-in-white Amitabh Bachchan), the big boss, also in Dubai, is the most wanted criminal on his side of the planet. Somewhere in this dizzy concoction are Boom Shanker (crude-mannered, loud, and sometimes humorous Javed Jaffri) who is Chote Mia’s right-hand man in Mumbai, and Alice (the still stylish, still sexy forty-something Zeenat Aman who couldn’t have chosen a worse comeback vehicle) who is Bade Mia’s all-knowing secretary. After two foiled attempts to pay the dons for the lost diamonds (the details of which are supremely stupid), the three models and their maid (Seema Biswas who does have her moments) land in Dubai to outwit the dons at their own game. What ensues is what you certainly don’t want to know. The viewer comes out of the theater, numbed and amazed at being hoodwinked and so outrightly deceived by the filmmakers.

Performances wise, there is nothing noteworthy in this project. Javed Jaffri does try to infuse comic relief, one pelvic thrust at a time, with mixed results. Jackie Shroff and Gulshan Grover, both of who gave us such subtly nuanced performances in Teen Deewarein, disappoint. Zeenat Aman, whose introduction includes an impromptu gig on Bade Mia’s table to her famous Hare Krishna Hare Ram number, will have little else to remember from this project. The three leggy models provide nothing more than flesh on display, while Seema Biswas briefly basks in the glory of a role that could have been interesting. And oh yes, if you blink you will miss the much-hyped Bo Derek sequence which is nothing more than a few seconds of Mr. Gustad’s indulgence, and also minuscule cameos by Boman Irani and designer Rohit Bahl. And now, to Mr. Bachchan. Die-hard Bachchan fans like this writer and scores of others, should start a "Save / Preserve Amitabh" fund, to prevent him from associating himself with anything remotely similar to or as sub-standard as BOOM. I still hope with unfailing regularity, day after day, that this fantastic actor-star-cinematic treasure will work some of that famous Bachchan magic again and act in a film worthy of his stature.

Technically, the music contributes little, the cinematography fluctuates from creative to downright bad, and Anna Singh’s costumes are either garish or missing (save for the carefully planned wardrobe of Mr. Bachchan). So, is there nothing redeeming in this endeavor? Sure, it does start with some promise. The zappy introductions to each character raise expectations of a cat-and-mouse thriller, but we are disappointed soon after. Bachchan’s moments with his family, his fascination with comic books, and some of Javed Jaffri’s and Seema Biswas’ scenes do hold interest, if only fleetingly. What these stolen moments battle with are huge doses of profanity, cheap humor, a senseless screenplay, and extremely bad editing. There are numerous unnecessary and vulgar scenes in BOOM. If Mr. Gustad was trying to go bold or attempting a spoof, he fails miserably. All that he succeeds in is displaying the gall to make a motion picture as dreadful as this. Enough said.


*** Well, Mr Bachan SWAPPING money with BOTH HANDS and FEETS too..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 4:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 2070
Location: Toronto, Canada
I, for one am not at all surprised that BOOM is a directorial calamity. BOOM depicts Kaizad Gustad's frail attempt to hold a strong homogeneous narrative. Gustad's first feature film Bombay Boy's also suffers from the same mess. His transfigured character's end up portraying a more seemingly derelict statement than actually having any conjunction to the film's crux. That being said, the compiled songs of BOOM are outstanding, it's just too bad the same can't be said about Gustad's film.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 4:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 12:38 am
Posts: 435
Okay, I'm sorry, how the hell can Planetbollywood justify that? A score of 1 out of 10? It's obvious they're just doing that to hop the bandwagon. Good job reviewers! Afraid to say something different? Nice.

I can understand why people didn't like this movie, but to pan it this much?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group