It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:12 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:21 am
Posts: 539
Location: Australia
This may be their first independent venture as producer and director, but you do expect more from MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST.

Reason being, producer Vishal Nihalani is not new to film-making. Ditto for director Apoorva Lakhia, who has assisted some of the biggest names in Hollywood, besides being associated with the Academy Award nominated LAGAAN.

Also, the film stars Abhishek Bachchan and Lara Dutta together for the first time. Besides, the promotion of the film – with rural India being highlighted in the promos – gives it a refreshingly unique look.

Obviously, MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST is an important film for reasons more than one.

But MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST is a mixed bag -- it boasts of some brilliantly executed sequences as also as some insignificant ones, which throw a spanner.

Despite the best efforts of the Indian government, there still exist villages that do not have electricity. MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST is the story of one such village.

MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST revolves around Kanji [Abhishek Bachchan] whose gift to his grand-father [television set] sparks off a power struggle, which leads to bloodshed and mayhem.

The modern world takes over the lives of these villagers and the powerful begin to feel the pinch...

Opting for a refreshingly different plot and setting up the drama in a village are efforts that need to be lauded. But instead of focussing on the interesting aspect of power struggle that ensues, the film run into various tracks that look completely out of place in a film like this.

But let's start with the plusses first!

Director Apoorva Lakhia knows the technique right. Together with cinematographer Gururaj R.J., he formulates an ambience that looks enchanting. Though a number of films have been shot in Rajasthan earlier, the visual impact of this film is stunning.

Besides, Apoorva has handled a couple of sequences with flourish. Those involving the negative elements [Yashpal Sharma, Akhilendra Mishra] are the best part of the enterprise. Lara's introduction [song], Abhishek and Yashpal Sharma's first meeting, the sequence when Yashpal confronts Lara and the climax can easily be singled out.

But as a writer, Apoorva doesn't get it completely right in his very first film. To start with, the character of Chunkey Pandey and the initial sequences try hard to evoke mirth, but fall flat.

While the basic story of power struggle is fascinating, too much screen time/footage has been undeservedly given to two characters mainly – Hari [Dayashankar Pandey] and Abdul [Shubro Bhattacharya]. Hari's obsession for moustaches and Abdul's slow motion act hardly evoke hilarity. In fact, they take the graph of the film downhill, making you wonder as to what was the idea behind making these characters so very prominent and in the process, deviating from the plot.

Also, the romance between Abhishek and Lara could've been better conceived. It looks too sudden from Lara's end, to respond so effortlessly.

Even the Raageshwari and the 'Star News' angle in the pre-climax seems unwarranted. Had the director concentrated on the conflict between Abhishek and Yashpal Sharma, the results would've been captivating.

But there's no denying that the director knows his job as a technician. His shot execution is far superior from most first-timers. In fact, it matches some of the best names on Hindi film circuit today. The climax is fantastic and the action in the climax [Shahid Ali] succeeds in keeping you spellbound.

Anu Malik's music has the rustic feel, which gels beautifully with the genre. 'Saiyyan' is the best of the lot and the choreography of this track [Vaibhavi Merchant] is fantastic. Even the background score is first-rate.

Gururaj R.J.'s cinematography is fabulous. The sand dunes have never looked so beautiful as in this film. Editing [Steven Bernard] could've been sharper. Costumes [Kinnari Pannikar, Theia, Pooja] are well worked upon.

Abhishek Bachchan enacts his part with conviction. There's no denying that the actor is cultivating his individual style and that's a welcome move. Lara Dutta looks gorgeous, but looks too up-to-the-minute to play a village belle. However, her performance is quite alright.

Yashpal Sharma is outstanding in a role that looks so authentic. Aditya Lakhia [Surya] is natural. Akhilendra Mishra is effective. Dayashankar Pandey and Shubro Bhattacharya irritate. Raageshwari and Chunkey Pandey don't impress.

On the whole, MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST has its moments of glory, but they're far to less to generate a lasting impact. Ordinary.

Rating:- * 1/2.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Rediff:Pack up for Abhishek, Badbakht:

((As for Abhishek Bachchan, Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost is not going to provide him with the hit he so desperately needs. You keep seeing his father in the way he acts, and you keep realising the son has a long way to go.)))


Lights! television! confusion!

Savera Someshwar | August 22, 2003 14:07 IST


You know how it is when you see a good film. You are riveted to the screen, popcorn and samosa forgotten. You are there, in the film, with everything happening on screen.

The intermission actually comes as a relief. You return to reality, remember to breathe again, chuck the samosa and stock up on the cold drinks. The lights dim and you are back, engrossed; your face a reflection of the emotions unfolding before your eyes.



When the movie ends, you are a bit fuzzy, but quite pleased. As you walk out into the bright sunlight, you don't even mind the slight headache at the sudden contrast from the dim confines of the theatre.

This Friday, you decide to watch Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost, starring Abhishek Bachchan and Lara Dutta. The television promos are interesting, the songs have caught your fancy and Lara Dutta looks good!

Besides, the film has a very Lagaan-ish look.

This is the director's first film, but Apoorva Lakhia seemed like someone who knew his job. After all, he assisted Mira Nair while she was making Kamasutra. He also assisted Ang Lee on The Ice Storm and Andrew Davis on The Perfect Murder. And he assisted Ashutosh Gowariker on Lagaan.

When the film opens with Amitabh Bachchan's baritone informing you this is the story of an Indian village that has just received electricity for the first time in its existence, the premise seems interesting.

As is the first shot: a group of villagers, some battling the darkness with lanterns, staring up at the camera expectantly. Suddenly, a bulb lights up. There is much jubilation and excitement.

Their village finally has electricity.

And then, Amitabh informs us, a gift arrives that will affect the lives of every one of the villagers.

Cut to Abhishek (Kanji), sitting on the roof of an overcrowded bus, swathed in a blanket, kohl-lined eyes peering intensely at the camera, much like his debut film Refugee. He is on his way to his village after staying in the city for 10 years.

The gift he bears is a television set and a dish antenna. He connects it up and, voila, there's a lion roaring regally on the screen as the villagers scramble for safety.

As the villagers continue to be obsessed by the seemingly magical television set, Kanji roams the village in the company of his childhool pal Surya (Aditya Lakhia), falls in love with Kesar aka KC (Lara) and has one meeting with the village's Thakur (Yashpal Sharma) that firmly draws the line between hero and villain.

Eventually, the battle is fought, recorded by a television camera crew that providentially arrives at the spot.

The hero wins, but there is no catharsis.

You are wondering: How did so many things go wrong?

Let us start with the weak and disjointed script that destroyed what seems to be a potentially funny premise.

Or should one talk about the comedy that falls flat as the villagers attempt to ape what they see on television in their real lives?

Or about characters that have been etched so thin that you wonder how they actually exist?

Or, maybe, we should talk about miscasting. Aditya, who was so endearing as Kachra in Lagaan, is a huge disappointment. His screentime is only slightly lesser than Abhishek's, but he wastes it completely with poor acting.

Actors like Yashpal Sharma, Dayashankar Pandey and Akhilendra Mishra, who were so unforgettable as Lakha, Goli and Arjan in Lagaan, are weak caricatures here.

Comparisons can be annoying and, in some cases, unfair. In this case, they can't be helped.

The film's huge Lagaan hangover works to its detriment. You constantly remember how good that film was as against how shallow this one is. Even the pre-battle song, Jeetenge baazi hum, is not a patch on Lagaan's Baar baar haan.

If Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost has a plus point, it lies in most of its foot-tapping song and dance numbers.

And in Lara Dutta, who does exactly what a Bollywood heroine is supposed to do: be a fetching distraction.

As for Abhishek Bachchan, Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost is not going to provide him with the hit he so desperately needs. You keep seeing his father in the way he acts, and you keep realising the son has a long way to go.

When some rediff.com readers were critical of Apoorva's interview that appeared on the site, this is what the young, much-tattooed director had to say.

Subject: I blame Abhishek: Apoorva

Please try to see the pain one took to make the film. It is definitely going to get nominated for the Oscars you see. However if not an Oscar, a National Award will definitely do good for the whole crew. From the early review it looks excellent

Posted by Apoorva Lakhia on 13-MAY-03

Unfortunately, the movie does not live up to that promise.

CREDITS
Cast: Abhishek Bachchan, Lara Dutta, Aditya Lakhia, Yashpal Sharma, Snehal Lakhia (grandfather), Dayashankar Pandey, Akhilendra Mishra, Shubro Bhattacharya (Abdul), with a special appearance by Raageshwari, Chunky Pandey and Rajendra Gupta
Director: Apoorva Lakhia
Producer: Vishal Nihalani
Music: Anu Malik
Cinematography: Gururaj R J




Edited By arsh on 1061569961


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Komal..DEJECTED/REJECTED too:radiosargam

(((On the whole, Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost is a childish attempt. It is as dry as the deserts of Rajasthan where it has been shot. Since it offers minimal entertainment, it will bomb at the box-office.)))



MUMBAI SE AAYA MERA DOST - (Reviewed By Komal Nahta)

Starring: Abhishek Bachchan, Lara Dutta, Chunkey Pandey, Aditya Lakhia, Yashpal, Daya Shankar Pandey, Akhilendra Mishra and Rageshwari
Director: Apoorva Lakhia
Producer: Vishal Nihalani
Music: Anu Malik

RATING: 0.5/10

Rubberband Films’ Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost is about electricity coming to a remote village of Rajasthan, thanks to the efforts of a senior visionary who lives there. The old man’s grandson lives in the city and while on a visit to his village, decides to gift a television set to his grandfather. The idiot box becomes a wonder box for the illiterate villagers who’ve never dreamt of such technology, leave alone experiencing its effects. The television, kept outside the old man’s house, acts like a virtual magnet, attracting the villagers, old and young, men and women, who soon get addicted to it.

The evil and tyrant village thakur is incensed by this and feels that the TV set could educate the villagers, enough to ultimately overthrow him as the village’s uncrowned king. Further, the grandson falls in love with the thakur’s pretty sister who, too, revolts against him to be with her beloved. This adds to the enmity between the thakur and the grandson.

As if that weren’t bad enough, the grandfather reveals to his grandson that the truth about his father’s death when he was a tiny kid had been hidden from him all these years, that it was the thakur who had killed him for a flimsy reason. That does it – the battle lines are drawn and it’s war between the grandson and the thakur. At first, the uneducated villagers are scared of siding with the grandson because they fear for their lives. But they gradually have a change of heart and in a blood-soaked finale, give the thakur and his men a fitting reply to end their tyranny.

The base of the story – village electrification – by its very nature is dry and drab. Since among even villages in India, most are already electrified and some even have the facility of Internet connection, the identification would be a problem. Even that wouldn’t have come in the way of the enjoyment of the film but the treatment of the subject is so juvenile that that problem (lack of identification) gets compounded by an uninteresting narrative. For instance, the comedy that could’ve emerged from the villagers first getting shocked by the television technology and then aping what they see on the small screen, just doesn’t come across.

Of the umpteen jokes intended to make the audience laugh, there are barely a couple which may just about manage to get a smile on the face. The track of the guy trying to walk in slow motion and romance like film characters irritates, to say the least. Besides, according to the script, the television is supposed to educate the illiterate villagers but the programmes they are shown watching day in and day out are Ramayan, Mahabharat, Hindi potboilers, cookery shows and the like. Education and entertainment presumably don’t have different connotations in the dictionary of debutant writer-director Apoorva Lakhia.

Besides a weird sense of humour, Lakhia seems to have a weird sense of scripting and direction too. For, what is conveyed through his dialogue is often completely different from what is conveyed through the visuals. The powerful thakur envies the television set of the villagers and often sends his goons to pick it up. Perhaps, he was unaware that if his goons could kill people at the drop of a hat, they could break a television set even more easily. Still, those tryant killers are shown struggling to take away the idiot box like idiots themselves.

The grandson vows to free his lady love from the clutches of her brother (thakur). What clutches? She has been shown strutting around in sexy clothes all through the drama. It is also such meaningless scenes that make the audience disconnect completely after a point of time. The angle of the television reporter covering the violent fight between the thakur’s men and the villagers, right on the field, looks silly, to say the least, if only because it appears that the thakur, whose deeds are being openly recorded on tape, can’t just do a thing about stopping the news crew. The entire track of the grandson’s boss in the city looks absurd, with the boss behaving worse than a buffoon. All in all, the script is poor, the comedy is poorer and the emotions, the poorest.

Given such a lacklustre subject and extremely weak handling by the director, it would be futile to even expect performances of standard from the cast. Abhishek Bachchan is alright as the grandson who gets the television set to the village and ultimately succeeds in getting the villagers to overthrow the thakur. Lara Dutta gets limited scope to expose her talent (which she does quite well) but plenty of scope to expose her anatomy in sexy traditional attire (which she does more than well)!

Aditya Lakhia, as Abhishek’s friend, is average. Yashpal Sharma is okay as the evil thakur. Snehal Lakhia (as grandfather), Dayashankar Pandey, Akhilendra Mishra, Ajay Khamosh and Shubro Bhattacharya are all victims of weak scripting, like the lead artistes, and they lend average support. Raageshwari is at least earnest about her job as a TV reporter. Rajendra Gupta has no role to speak about. Chunkey Panday tries to tickle the ribs but fails.

Except for creating the village ambience reasonably well, debut-making writer-director Apoorva Lakhia is unable to do much to make an engaging drama. Plenty of what he wanted to convey has probably remained in his mind but the paying public would not apply their minds to gauge what he wanted to say. Overall, the film becomes one big lifeless drama without a soul, at the end of which the audience gets the feeling of ‘much ado about nothing’.

Anu Malik’s music is, perhaps, the only plus point in the film. ‘Saiyyan’, ‘Shaher ka jadoo re’ and ‘Koi bheega hai’ are extremely well-tuned. A couple of song picturisations are eye-filling but in an authentic village atmosphere, they look out of place. Gururaj R.J.’s camerawork caresses the outdoor locales of Rajasthan with love. Shahid Ali’s action scenes are well composed. Editing is okay.

:nopity:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 3:20 pm
Posts: 886
to me apoorva lakhia appears to be a name dropper more than anything else.....just because he has 'assisted' mira nair and woody allen the past, Bollywood people seem to go ga-ga-gasp over his abilities....interesting insight Rachel Shelley's article provides in that Guardian article (right at the time of LAGAAN's release).....check out the para titled 'The end' for a description of Lakhia (called Apoo in the article) by his 'fiance'.....here's a link to that article....

http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/fea ... 51,00.html




Edited By Aarkayne on 1061582885


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:21 am
Posts: 539
Location: Australia
you gotta feel sorry for AB, his personal life is probably at a all time low & now that karishma is getting married must be not easy for the guy. I wanted this movie to do well but going by the reviews it might not happen.

kuch na kaho with aishwarya doesn't look very promising either :bangbang:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
[kuch na kaho with aishwarya doesn't look very promising either ]

So, BOOM or NO BOOM(as AB Sr got it delayed), Jr is DOOMED! :nopity:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 7:30 pm
Posts: 756
Location: canada
all 3 of AB baby's films MSAMD, Kuch na kaho and Zameen dont look anything great...... so no matter what AB Sr does it probably wont help..........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:21 am
Posts: 539
Location: Australia
and he's going to be lost in the crowd in LOC so even if that movie does well it wont help him much


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 3:20 pm
Posts: 886
If Bachchan Sr. is comparable to Connery Sr. (Sean), wouldnt Bachchan Jr. compare similarly to Connery Jr. (Jason) ie a nobody as far as their Hollywood/Bollwood careers go?

I personally think though that AB.Jr. still has the stuff in him....it is his attitude (all hearsay mind you) that sucks....i had read in an article long ago that most of these star kids are all the same....because they are industry children, they always seem to have this air of been-there-seen-it-all about them....except ofcourse it is their parents that have been-there-seen-it-all.....and if they are brought up well, like AB.Jr pretends to be, they are all politeness etc. yet there's always a thin veneer of arrogance behind it all....which in turn tends to cloud judgement and end up in choosing bad movies.....his saving grace might yet be that Ramu film(which has been oft discussed but never really taken off) or the Mani Ratnam film......




Edited By Aarkayne on 1061582786


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Watch him on DVD tomorrow..ha ha! :nopity:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2003 1:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 2:36 am
Posts: 435
i saw this stupid movie and basically its a complete waste of time. Most of the movie seems to be a copycat of Lagaan, but this time it doesn't have good acting, a good story or any really entertaining situations. Sure its funny watching the villagers watch TV, but to show the same scenes over and over again - GIMME A BREAK!!!

And after this initial sequence of events, the film turns into a completely cliched love story track complete with an out of place violent climax (which oddly enough tries to ripoff SHOLAY!!!).

The music is ok.. but isn't really that great. The cinematography is again passable but is nowhere near the quality of Lagaan and the acting by all actors is just plain HORRIBLE. I won't diss ABjr. but lets just say this could be his worst role ever. The film itself is very slow paced and doesn't even have a plot - i didn't really even get what it was trying to say!! I don't think it had a message or anything!!!


So in summary... avoid this piece of shit at all costs!! It's another nail in the coffin for friggin Abhishek :ffs: :ffs: :ffs:

:bangbang: :bangbang: :bangbang: :bangbang: :bangbang:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Mumbai industry se GAYA mera dost:

DOUBLE PAIN for AB jr:

A LATE ARRIVAL MARS THE CHARMS OF ABHISHEK'S FLICK

By S Pankaj

Critic's-I-view

click for larger view

Though people have stopped counting number of flop films that Junior Bachchan aka Abhishek Bachchan has given till date, his latest film 'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' releases incidentally just when his one time ex-fianc頩s getting married to some one else. No doubt, it will add to his pain if 'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' fails. The film has opened to a lackluster opening though.

click for larger view

The film also gives a signal that viewers are not interested in watching Junior B alone on the silver screen. And, Abhishek too has understood it. He has, therefore, started doing mutistarrers.

Had he been more realistic and chosen films like ' Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' from the day one, the going for him would have been smoother. The failure of his last few films have proved curse for 'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost'. Despite being an average but brilliantly executed film, it will find it very difficult to sail across the box-office.

'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' was originally scheduled for a May 16 release and was also to premiered at the International Indian Film Academy awards ceremony in Johannesburg, South Africa, along with his father Amitabh Bachchan's 'Armaan', but yeh ho na saka.

'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' is a story of the people of India who even in this 21st century live without electricity and such like things. This is the tale of a city guy Kanji (Abhishek Bachchan) who comes to meet his grandfather (Snehal Lakhia) in a village. Making this village a symbol, first time director Apoorva Lakhia presents a story on Indian screen that will attract more people in metros than in smaller towns of the country. The people of India have become addict to the escapist cinema. Not many directors, including the big ones, have tried to make a film on the problems of a common man. On this note, its director needs an openhearted ovation. Back to the story, Kanji's grandfather lives in a village that got electricity only recently. Kanji brings with him a mysterious gift that creates a lot of speculation, ultimately leading to conflicts within the village. Kanji meets the seductive lasso Kesar aka KC (Lara Dutta) in this village. In her eyes, Kanji would find a world of his love and would forget everything around him. But people of the village will not take it easy. So, they fight over this issue and get divided in two groups. There are people who want to see more and more of things that Kanji has brought from the city. But others think Kanji has brought things, which would lead to adultering their untouched surroundings. The fight goes on endlessly, but will Kanji be able to win their hearts.



The film has a treatment like a film made overseas and that is not without any reason. Its director Aporva Lakhia has worked with the likes of director Ang Lee, as his assistant in films like 'The Ice Storm' (Kevin Kline, Joan Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Tobey Maguire, Elijah Wood, Christina Ricci), with director Andrew Davis in 'The Perfect Murder' (Michael Douglas, Gwyneth Paltrow, Viggo Mortensen) and also as assistant to director Mira Nair in 'The Perez Family' (Alfred Molina, Marisa Tomei, Angelica Huston). His credentials also include working as assisting director to Ashutosh Gowariker in the Oscar-nominated 'Lagaan'. 'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' is like a dream come true for him.



'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' was touted as the big ticket for Abhishek Bachchan for stardom, but the film again puts him in a box.

Abhishek Bachchan has tried hard to enact his father's role as the latter did in 'Saudagar' but for Abhishek it must have been a Herculean task to play Kanji on screen. Here, he is seen in a new get up and his interaction with simpletons of village do raise many hilarious situations. He tries hard to meet the expectations. But the film falls short of the requirements of the present day's box office. Abhishek's role of Kanji is not well designed and it leaves more than desired from Abhishek.

But, it is Lara Dutta who comes as a visual treat in this film. She oozes lot of oomph in the film. After a modern girl in 'Andaaz, she plays a village belle and looks damn attractive in her skimpy outfits. There are at least four artistes from 'Lagaan' namely, Akhilendra Mishra, Yashpal Sharma, Aditya Lakhia and Dayashanker Pandey. All these and other supporting stars work very aptly.

click for larger view

Behind the scenes, Apoorva's drama in the desert of Jaisalmer is mostly a family affair. His mother Kinnari Pannikar has designed some of Lara Dutta's outfits. His aunt Meera Lakhia has worked as the production designer and his cousin Aditya and uncle Snehal are also seen facing the camera, while cousin Ashish is his assistant. And, Apoorva's younger brother Abhijeet has done the storyboard and stepfather John Pannikar has shot the movie stills. The film has been shot in and around Jaisalmer, and presents the desert city more beautifully than ever-in Bollywood films. However, the film falls flat in the field of music. Though there are three music directors, Anu Malik, Ranjit Barot and Amar Mohile, none has come out with a single hit number. More than content it is the handling of the subject that leaves much to be done to make 'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost' a hit film at the box office.

BTW**** was AB sr. in SAUDAGAR?


:baaa:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 1:46 am
Posts: 364
Location: NEW ALBANY, OH, U.S.A
arsh wrote:
BTW**** was AB sr. in SAUDAGAR?

No way, Saudagar had Raj kumar, Dilip kumar, Vivek M and Manisha K .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
[Abhishek Bachchan has tried hard to enact his father's role as the latter did in 'Saudagar' but for Abhishek it must have been a Herculean task to play Kanji on screen. Here, he is seen in a new get up and his interaction with simpletons of village do raise many hilarious situations]

Then which film they r refering too? Sholay or Mr . Natwar Lal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 3:05 am
Posts: 176
No, Saudagar is right.

Link to IMDB for info on Saudagar.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group