|
OK!! darius, got ur point, now my point is, those panoramic shots, dont do justice, to what you and me have seen in the film..the way, that cinematographer, captured, india/bombay/din/raat/traffic/freeway. rain etc..has to be seen to understand, what I am talking about, this kinda cinematography/angles you only see in HOLLYWOOD films..REMARKABLE!!
In STUPID films of BOLLYWOOD, like CC/K3G/MPKHD etc, you see OVERSEAS LOCALES, but NOT THIS KINDA TASTEFUL< WORLDCLASS CINEMATOGRAPHY! every day!
Now..Tara Sharma..that LYRIL GIRL, has INNOCENT face(important for this role, i am glad Bipasha was not casted for this role) and Million dollar smile!! I agree..She still has to proove as an actress and learn how to speak, but her role was like this, did not hurt her much..
Mahima..had very small role..and is WASTED IMHO..her little bit presence was as mature an actress like her could be!! But she looked much older and not as CUTE as tara, and even not the way she looked in DHT!
Zohra Sehgal..Late..Lord bless her soul...looked ancient, and as it was one of her last living presence..she reminded me of MOTHER TERESA!
The church, song..the girl, has such a good mature facial expressions, but ofcourse, she was no TARA!!
John abraham..basically, carried film on his shoulders..his DIOLOGUES, Voice looked ALIEN to me, he sounded like AFTAB in KASOOR, may be it was same pERSON, who DUBBED for BOTH?
His acting was PRETTY GOOD! for this role..But ofcourse he NEEDS to mature to proove his VERSATILITY..
OVERALL, SAAYA, was GOOD ENOUGH, to OVERCOME , BAD AFTER TASTE in my mouth, after watching.DUMB..CHALTE CHALTE..
BHOOT and SAAYA are 2 very different films and are NO WAY SIMILLAR, and BOTH need to be watched on their OWN MERITS>>
BHOOT..had a GREAT FACE VALUE, due to RGV and million dollar CAST!! that SAAYA lacked!!
Edited By arsh on 1057556282
|
Login 
Register
FAQ
Search
h: 
