It is currently Fri Oct 31, 2025 6:26 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 12 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Zoran009
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
A destructive obsession

Shobha Warrier | February 26, 2003 17:55 IST


With Julie Ganapathy, Balu Mahendra proves even after five years he has not lost his touch as director.

Julie Ganapathy frightens, scares and shocks you. Yet, you love the film.

Julie (Saritha) is an obese, disturbed woman who possibly murdered her husband in a fit of jealousy. Her story is incomplete without Thenkasi Balakumaran (Jayaram), a popular writer of Tamil television serials.

Balu, a Malayalee born and brought up in Thenkasi, writes the much loved serial Manga. Julie identifies strongly with its protagonist Manga and that makes her crazy about the serial and its writer.

She calls herself Balu's number one and most loyal fan.

Balu goes to a hotel at a hill-station, as has been his practice, to write the final 25 episodes of the serial. On his way back, he meets with a near fatal accident and is rescued by Julie Ganapathy.

The narrative gains momentum from this point on. Julie couldn't have asked for more. She has her favourite writer in her home with broken legs, a sprained arm and a bruised body. She nurses him with the demented intensity of the jealous and maniacal lover that she is.

While the outside world searches for the writer, Julie keeps him to herself without anyone -- not even the watchman of her bungalow -- aware of his presence. As her mood swings, Julie's behaviour changes. Compassionate and loving one moment, violently obsessive the next. She threatens and abuses Balu one moment but becomes caring and gentle the next.

Balu is practically locked inside the room. In the beginning, Julie makes him believe that the town is cut off due to heavy rain. Slowly, he realises he has become a prisoner. As he gets desperate to escape, she becomes the mad jailer.

She also turns violent when she gets to read the last episodes of the serial where the protagonist dies. After burning the pages, she asks him to turn the story into a happy ending. Every day, every moment in Balu's life becomes a struggle from then on.

To the director's credit, he sustains the viewers' interest with just two characters in a room. They are not the typical hero and heroine -- Balu, the hero, is confined to the bed. Julie, the heroine, is an unattractive woman.

If it were not for Saritha who makes a grand comeback with this film and Jayaram, Julie Ganapathy would not have been half as powerful. Julie trudges the thin line between sanity and insanity. Very rarely do you see restrained performances from artistes portraying eccentric characters on the Indian screen. Not once does Saritha cross the line. Her mood swings are so convincing and abrupt that she keeps you on tenterhooks.

It is a difficult role for Jayaram -- as a bed-ridden patient, he has to emote with his eyes alone. He turns in a very good performance. Like the audience, he is frightened, scared and helpless in front of the unpredictable Julie.

Ramya Krishnan as Balu's wife doesn't have to do much so also the other characters.The film is not without flaws. One can't understand why Balu Mahendra decided to insert a seductive number by Ramya Krishnan in the film. She is portrayed as Balu's very ordinary wife but she pops up as sultry 'Ramya Krishnan' in a sequence totally out of place and unwarranted. It only takes your mind off the intense narrative.

Another sore point is the jarring and loud background score. Indian films still cannot accept that sometimes silence can be far more effective than loud noises.

Except for these discordant notes, Julie Ganapathy is a film worth watching.

http://rediff.com/movies/2003/feb/26julie.htm
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: Birmingham
And they didn't realise this movie is a remake of an angrezi flick........
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
bhaskar wrote:
And they didn't realise this movie is a remake of an angrezi flick........

I'm wracking my brain trying to think of the original film. In that one, the guy was tied to the bed the whole time. "Misery"?
Top
 Profile  
 
ganti
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 3:45 pm
Posts: 515
Location: columbus
Yes it is Misery and seems like 100% copy.
Top
 Profile  
 
mrig
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 3:05 am
Posts: 176
Yup, Misery with the superb Kathy Bates.
Top
 Profile  
 
Shahran Sunny Audit
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2003 2:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:28 am
Posts: 1373
Location: London, UK
The is indeed a direct copy of Misery and quite a poor version. I saw the film hoping that after being away from cinema for a while the director would comeback with something like Sadma, but sadly the film was lacking and poorly directed.

When it comes to horror genre Indian cinema sucks. They should be more daring like the Koreans or Japanesse. I would love to see something like Audition or the Ring Trilogy! Even the Amercians are poor at making the horror genre. Did anyone see Final Destination 2 or 13 Ghosts!!
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2003 3:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Shahran Sunny Audit wrote:
The is indeed a direct copy of Misery and quite a poor version. I saw the film hoping that after being away from cinema for a while the director would comeback with something like Sadma, but sadly the film was lacking and poorly directed.

When it comes to horror genre Indian cinema sucks. They should be more daring like the Koreans or Japanesse. I would love to see something like Audition or the Ring Trilogy! Even the Amercians are poor at making the horror genre. Did anyone see Final Destination 2 or 13 Ghosts!!

I didn't see Final Destination 2, but I saw Final Destination, which was quite an interesting film. I saw no need to retread it in a sequel. I'm hoping Bhoot will be decent.
Top
 Profile  
 
Aryan
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 12:45 pm
Posts: 500
Location: Singapore
Yeah Final Destination 2 is a joke. I was laughing throughout the film. Hollywood can be really bad at times! But they have their fair share of good horror films (over many years) like The Exorcist, The Shining, What Lies Beneath. Hindi cinema, of course, has none of this calibre.
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Aryan wrote:
Yeah Final Destination 2 is a joke. I was laughing throughout the film. Hollywood can be really bad at times! But they have their fair share of good horror films (over many years) like The Exorcist, The Shining, What Lies Beneath. Hindi cinema, of course, has none of this calibre.

Last year's "Frailty" was also very disturbing.
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2003 5:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Balu Mahendra interview

http://www.rediff.com/movies/2003/mar/04balu.htm

Is Julie Ganapathy based on the Hollywood film Misery?

No, my film is not based on any Hollywood film. I have not seen the film mentioned by you. It is based on the Tamil translation of an English novel by Esthoppan that I read long ago.

Readers say it was based on Stephen King's novel.

I only read the Tamil translation. The author's name was given as Esthoppan, which could be the Tamil name for Stephen.

I would say this film has something to do thematically with my earlier film Moondram Pirai, which is about a mentally retarded girl being brought up by a simple, male school teacher. Here, she [Julie Ganapathy] is a mad woman who has a normal man in her house. And, in a brutal way, she loves him.


:baaa:
Top
 Profile  
 
congress
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2003 12:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 11:29 am
Posts: 1028
Location: Singapore
I thought Jaani Dushman was "scary" :p
Top
 Profile  
 
spike86
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 4:29 pm
Posts: 672
Location: NY
'What lies beneath' is a sorry ass excuse for a scary movie with cheap scares. And yes 'Raaz' stinks too. :rolleyes:

'Ringu' is scary

'Devil's Back bone' is pretty good too.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 12 posts ] 

Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group