Thanks Saz for writing that piece.
Quote:
DEI does not pick and choose which title will be better or less quality. This is all determined by the print master. We use the same methods on all titles released by us. There are many instances where negatives were not stored properly, and therefore you cannot achieve the same quality. A good
instance is Julie and Ram Aur Shyam. Both masters were received from Bombay together, both masters were processed in the same manner, yet both yielded different results. Also a factor is the negative stock material that was used when the movie was shot....(Eastman color usually gives the best
results)....and also the shooting equipment that was used....all these factors come into play as to how the video and audio quality will turn out.
I dunno to everyone else but that just reads like DEI haven’t got a clue what they are doing :doze: Maybe a black-box syndrome; they input a film print into this black-box and use the results as they come out. Is quality control and digital re-mastering not an issue? You know the stuff normal DVD companies do day in day out regarding old master pieces ??? I don’t have much of a problem what you have said here; given that the reputation of storage and mistreatment of prints is commonly know; so quality regarding old films, you are going to get different results depending on what state you find the prints in. But also say this much; give the same print to someone else like Hong Kong Legends and you will see amazing results. Says a lot about how DEI and HKL handle DVD mastering (and no its not a cost issue).
Quote:
Regarding the use Gold media like before and not silver media (e.g. Abhay).
Another misnomer. Whether gold or silver is used, has no bearing on the quality of what’s on the DVD. DEI does not have control over which one is used, as replication plants make this determination. And also, silver is known to produce a better quality disc.....i.e....less playability problems
such as freezing etc.
Hmmmm... interesting findings this. First of all I don’t recall anyone every saying here that it effects quality, no media can by itself! But I have on many occasions said disc freezing problems and video skipping could be related to these silver discs – this is merely a speculation without any evidence. I would like to you see where you got the line
‘silver is known to produce a better quality disc.....i.e....less playability problems
such as freezing etc’ – entertain me with the evidence and I’ll be willing to change my opinion on this. Fact is many people have complained about disc freezing problems regardless of gold/silver disc. Again its a lack of quality control of the product. But I'll await the evidence.
Quote:
We do agree that this was a problem at the beginning....but has been corrected. We feel that people are incorrectly claiming squash problems when there is none. Abhay and YDA was correctly framed contrary to the review posted on the Zulm website. Comments such as these are incorrect, and being posted by people who have no knowledge of what they are talking about. Mr. Ali claims in his review that YDA is 2.35 incorrectly framed at 2.40. My question is, how does he determine that the original aspect ratio is 2.35,
and how does he determine that it is incorrectly framed at 2.40?.....These comments are absolutely incorrect, and just feed this misinformation. Our position is that Abhay, and YDA were not squashed, and were correctly framed. A look at the comparative shots on the YDA review show this.
First of all who are WE? Would be nice to identify yourself. I still say the problem has not been rectified – especially on YDA, Abhay and more recently on TKNP. I’m just trying to grasp what you're trying to tell me here – because there’s clear refusal to acknowledge this problem, so I want to be clear on what you are saying.
Are you saying this site is purposely squashing images to create a problem on DEI DVDs? Or are you saying that the problem doesn’t exist even when the DVD themselves show them? ??? YDA in particular shows evidence of this; because the trailers and one song are correctly framed. You can capture shots from both and tell there is a difference in image aspect ratio – so both can’t be right?
You say
‘look at the comparative shots on the YDA review show this’ – does it! Those shots show different AR, did you not notice one is longer than the other and question why this is? I could really break it down for you if you really want :wot:
But if you saying I’m purposely squashing these images just on DEI titles – then that’s something different, in which case other people can take the screen shots themselves and tell for themselves.
Ali