Masti man and Arsh you make good points.

HR is an average actor and follows his standard routine and I think people will get bored of this. He seems to have one dance step sequence (a bit like Jeetendra(no offence) who had the same steps for 20 years). HR appears to have reached his limit.

In my opinion there are better actors in bollywood and the top 3 are Aamir, SRK and AB who have screen presence.

Hrithik no doubt has a lot of potential but what is bringing him down is the over exposure and the fact that he is being stereotyped.. when he first danced in knph it was wonderful but now it is so repetitive that one cannot appreciate his immense talent.... he needs to go for more roles of substance ... he has the potential just needs the right roles... he alaso needs to cut down on his tv appearances and ads etc as the audience can see him everywhere... they dont need to go to the cinema... i think with some good roles he has a chance of making it... he did act really well in k3g

Just wondering....why hasn't anyone jumped on SRK's case about his "Asoka"..was that a good movie? hmmmm...
:vsneaky:










~HrithikRoshan84



Edited By HrithikRoshan84 on April 25 2002 at 18:44

Saw Asoka and thought it was a good movie.

Good acting by the cast inc SRK.

Your the only one who thinks so..haven't seen anyone else post anything..but then again..after they read this post they will, to back you up..by the way..SRK and good acting shouldn't be in the same sentence



~HrithikRoshan84

i dont even understand why one compares hrithik with shahrukh... shahrukh has been in the industry for over 10 years now and has really worked his way up... true he had some very bad films in between but he has always been able to consolidate his position with the verstality of roles that he lays... who else would have attempted a baazigar or a darr???? he is now a veteran in the film industry that actors like hrithik look up to...
hrithik is just 3 years old in the industry and has had just 3 solo hero films... but the hype surrounding him as well as the overexposure makes it look like he has been here much longer... he has been stereotyped in his solo hero films... and he should choose more challenging roles and i am sure he will be amongst the top.... the fact that there are such high expectations from his movies makes the press write more about him... but he will bounce back cos he shows potential...
hrithik and shahrukh must not be compared jsut like shahrukh and amitabh must not be compared... they are all in different phases of their acting career...
hrithik should be compared with his competition that is abhishek( dont know about him making it) and ofcourse the most promising newcomer this year vivek oberoi... he seems to be choosing his roles very sensibly and they all have substance... he will go a long way....

Very true statements..but I didn't compare Hrithik to SRK...
In SRK's first 3 years he was also the hype and overexposed and he had flops...so why is it different with Hrithik?..It shouldn't be..yes it's true people expect a lot out of Hrithik and why shouldn't they..he's a great star. I haven't seen AMALL (waiting for the DVD to be shipped). It might be as bad as the reviewers say but I will see for myself..his next movie 'Na Tum Jaano Na Hum' will be his revival from his status from AMALL. let's wait and see



~HrithikRoshan84

YA YA YA!!! DUGU 84!!

lol dont even compare srk first 3 years with hr. kabhi haan kabhi naan kills all hr flicks... dont forget he started from scratch unlike duggu.

Here is my opinion on this whole thing.
I, for one, believe this whole "Hrithik/AMALL" thing is being blown way out of proportion. Reviewers have attacked Hrithik and Amisha as individuals and as a pair, and even, without reason attack Hrithik's dancing. What a joke, they obviously have nothing else to say and they have resorted to nonsense. Hrithik is a great dancer, bar none, any time we see him dance, is a privelige in my opinion, he is gifted and sharing a gift is a good thing. They attack his acting abilities!?!? I have not seen AMALL as yet, still waiting for the DVD to come to my mailbox, but to say he isnt a good actor is even more garbage. When one film comes out, do we forget the countless ones that come out before them? One movie doesnt make or break an actor. Many will say that Kaho Naa....Pyaar Hai made him a big star, yes it did, but too big, people and the media made him a bigger star than he should of been, they raised him on a peddlestool. They had their reasons, he was new and fresh, he wasnt the old SRK and the even older Amitabh Bachchan. They industry needed something new, and it was him. Next came Fiza and Mission Kashmir, which I feel he acted great in, watching those movies, you dont even feel that at that time, he was less than a year old in the industry. If anything was wrong with those movies, it was the directors. The directors are at fault, and watching the movie it is obvious that the script is garbage and the directors dont know what they are doing, but the one thing that stood out, was Hrithik's acting. So Hrithik's new movie is a flop, who is to blame? The director has already taken the blame for the film. He feels it was his fault, so why blame Hrithik? Others are saying "he should sign better scripts, he needs to be versitile" he has done versitile projects such as Fiza and Mission Kashmir, and the audiences wanted him as a solo hero, they got him as a solo hero, but if the director is garbage, what is he suppose to do? When an actor/actress gets that script in their hand, do you think that on the top it says: Box Office Prediction: Flop!? and then the actor/actress signs? People like Subhash Ghai dont know what they are doing, they make a script and change it so many times, they make the audience suffer through their horrible films. The only things actors such as Hrithik are responsible for are their acting, the directors tell them what to do, they make the film, not Hrithik, he didnt run behind the camera and start telling himself what to do, the director did. And SRK is a whole another story........

Wow...you summed it up..everything that needed to be said..
and I agree with every word. Good job

D:

Face it...Hrithik peaked with KNPH. He will be compared with his debut film for his entire career and he will NEVER measure up to it.

Saif Bakra in PAPA ROSHAN's mean hands to SALVAGE Sinking SHIP of BETA RSHAN!!

Director Arjun Sablok's work has not enthused Pantaloon, who've called in Rakesh Roshan to give a film a major overhauled, never mind if the budget shot over the planned Rs. 9 crore and is nudging about Rs. 18 crore! This is bad news, not just for the sulking Sablok also for saif since he suddenly finds himself several scenes and a song less.

source: Cineblitz May02




:vsneaky: :vsneaky: :vangry: ???

HrithikRoshan84 you asked the question, so be a man and accept what other have to say. I will however say it again SRK is a much better actor than HR and has made many good films including Asoka which has had good reviews and some which are not so good, but after wathing the movie I can say it was a great movie.

I have nothing against HR, may be in years to come he might accomplish his goal in becoming a good all round actor.

Oh yes and one more thing I do not need anyone to back me up as I speak my mind as I see it and not follow like a sheep follows the herd.

No hard feelings for being to the point.

What are you talking about? Did I say "don't answer my question"..be a man..ha. I guess your right Shahrukh Khan is a good actor in the films he made which is like what? 50? 60?
How many has Hrithik made...ohhhh(No Answer needed here).
And thats great that you think Asoka was a good movie after "wathing" it. By the way, you need a better analogy..sheep? You must be an old guy..why don't you go lay down in your bed and count some sheep

~HrithikRoshan84