It is currently Fri Oct 31, 2025 10:08 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:26 am
Posts: 22
Location: India
there are three options
I1) In all DVD players the optical or coaxial output sends the 5.1 stream to the reciever or 2ch to the reciever when selected
2) in a normal DVD player with 2 ch output 2 jacks at the back if a track is 5.1 it is mixed down by default in the player and sent out as 2 ch stereo, a 2 ch stereo track if present or selected by the user is sent as it is.

3) in a DVD with 6 output jacks at the back when connected to a amplfiers it sends the 5.1 output and selects 2 ch when the user chooses to reduce a 5.1 track to 2 ch for playback on a TV.


Now why do we need a 2 ch track, imagine the 5 channels as five boxes of fixed sizes, if you have fit them in a space of 2 or 3 boxes would you not sacrifice some part of the box or alter the matter in it in someway. This is similar

also why is the 2ch bit rate crazy at 192 kbps per second for 2 ch it is pretty high and gives decent quality audio comparable to a CD

what happens in dolby is when you make a track 5.1 with no 2ch track you cannot have the full range of sound effects. and the overall range and impact of the 5.1 track has to be reduced as when this played on a 2 ch system it would break the speakers... as for a 2 ch system the 5.1 track is mixed down to 2 ch


so the guy expecting a proper mix of 5.1 sound loses out ,thus they include the 2ch track which is used by the guy with a normal stereo TV and the 5.1 track is not adjusted for a 2 ch setup.

so please dont blindly say we dont need a 2 ch track and all the conversion happens in a DVD player or AV reciever


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 2:15 pm
Posts: 441
Location: USA
Watched Jhoom Barabar Jhoom last night with the DTS audio track, which has no story line or I should say lacks one. The highlight of the movie is the title song or main song "Jhoom Barabar Jhoom" where BIG B makes a foul of himself, but when YRF is willing to pay 2-3 crores for doing nothing I'd do the same :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Quote:
where BIG B makes a foul of himself, but when YRF is willing to pay 2-3 crores for doing nothing I'd do the same



I agree!! paisa phenk, gay guru ka tamasha dekh :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I did try both DD, DTS on this disc and as usual, find it superior with BASS altogether tight and more integrated feel to soundtrack. just my 2 cents!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 4:14 pm
Posts: 342
It was a great comeback for.......those Shahenshah boots!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Come on: Amitabh Bachchan had better moves than Bobby Deol — :lol: .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
Just managed to see this DVD today and I'd say it's not half bad. Pseudo-prog (proper film-to-NTSC), decent colour rendition and excellent sound. What more can we ask these days?

The only real downside was the amount of pixellating, which was even worse than on the UTV Don DVD. There's always something. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
I agree with the Stephen Bhai .. the DVD is not that bad as some have said. It seems to be decent .. too bad my HT is in the repair shop I would have love to hear the DTS.

BTW I didnt notice any heavy pixelation .. unless I am going blind. Now I watched this on my PS3 upscaled with two features turned on:

  • Frame Noise Reduction (Set to reduce fine noise.)
  • Block Noise Reduction (Set to reduce mosaic-like block noise displayed on the screen.)

Would this make a difference in the amount of pixellation seen? I noticed a difference in the Dhoom 2 Title song on my YRF Go Dhoom Songs DVD which on a normal DVD player showed a heavy amount of pixelation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
The pixellating was most noticable to me at the start of the dance contest sequence when the picture completely disintegrates. I don't think even the best noise reducers would fix this, but I could be wrong. Glad you didn't see the horrors of it anyways, UL Bhai. ;)

Here's some screencaps...

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
it depends upon your dvd player deinterlacer also. I dont see this even with DCDI processor engaged as good as black, and still quiet a bit motion blur, but no pixellation, i might have to get close to my screen or may be my dvd player's processor fixing it.

btw on powerdvd, when u play back, dd 5.1 and 2.0 plays louder than dts but overall, dts renders better balanced soundtrack imho.

what do you say stephen re dts vs dd on this dvd.

btw i thought german or french dhoom had dts too?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
arsh wrote:
what do you say stephen re dts vs dd on this dvd.


They sounded equally as good to me.

arsh wrote:
btw i thought german or french dhoom had dts too?


Yes, but not true DTS. The track was just converted from the DD 5.1 audio.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
YRF Jhoom Barabar Jhoom is Pseudo-Prog encoding (Film to NTSC; Not Field Averaged)).


Last edited by rana on Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:59 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Scotland
rana wrote:
YRF Jhoom Barabar Jhoom is Pseudo-Prog encoding (Film to PAL; Not Field Averaged)).


I mentioned that a few posts ago. But it's film-to-NTSC, not PAL. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
Stephen wrote:
rana wrote:
YRF Jhoom Barabar Jhoom is Pseudo-Prog encoding (Film to PAL; Not Field Averaged)).


I mentioned that a few posts ago. But it's film-to-NTSC, not PAL. ;)

Oops, my mistake. I meant to type "NTSC" but typed "PAL" instead.
Corrected my post.

-----------------
Obviously I missed Stephen's post mentioning it's "Direct Film to NTSC transfer".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2779
Location: I N D I A
I simply love the dts on this dvd -- excellent!

I have to disagree with those not in favour of dts in Bollywood films -- more than 50% of home theatre is the audio domain and the clearer and the meatier it is, the better -- and what better than dts to do that on conventional home theatres!!

BTW, is the image cropped, or is the matte opened up a little on top and bottom? YR have never cropped in the past...

Meanwhile, I also bought the DVD-Audio of JBJ -- amazing sound on that with dts, dd5.1, lossless PCM :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group