It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 7:33 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: My Review of "Nishabd"
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
I just got back from having watched Ram Gopal Varma's Nishabd. I'll post and write my review shortly, but, in the mean time, I just wanted to state that it's one of the best movies I've seen in a good while, and showcases one of Amitabh Bachchan's finest performances, as well (there's saying a lot, by the way).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: My Review of "Nishabd"
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
I'd start out here with some brief summation of Ram Gopal Varma, or of Amitabh Bachchan, or of "Indian cinema, as a whole" — something generally "introductory" — but I'd rather just get this out immediately: Nishabd is one of the finest films I've seen in some time. It also features one of Amitabh Bachchan's career's best performances. Quite a lot said, but none of it without merit. So, the "verdict" given, read on if you wish to know how I came to my sweeping, yet accurate, conclusion.

I should perhaps begin by correcting the misconception that a significant number of persons (who have not yet seen the movie) seem to be holding in regard to Nishabd: The film is not, by any reasonable stretch of the imagination, a "re-interpretation" of Vladimir Nabokov's book, Lolita. Lolita was sexual and wry; its "protagonist," an aggressive, psychologically "flamboyant" man who was willing to go to indefensible extents to bone a pre-adolescent girl for whom he couldn't hide his boner. By contrast, Ram Gopal Varma's Nishabd is the story of a conceivably "typical," "well" man, into whose life, one day, walks a cocksure, flippant young woman who excites him and rejuvenates him — who, slowly but eventually, works her way into his sentiments — and of the consequences that this all has on his life. It's the story of an older man who falls for a younger woman: The topic is universal and plausible enough not to have to be pinned on any former artisitic work, not in need to be deemed an "inspired-by" piece.

The topic of Nishabd, indeed, is both universal and easily accessible. Yet, it's one that causes a great deal of friction and controversy whenever it is brought up, and has perhaps thus not been explored to death by filmmakers prior. This is both freeing and frightening, no doubt, for Varma, as he's left quite free to do just "what" he wants, but quite limited, as well, in being able to look to others to see exactly what has "worked," and what has not. As much can go right, then, as can go wrong; fortunately, not much ever really goes wrong.

Any movie is two things: what you see, and what you hear. I'll admit that, at first, I feared that Varma would subject me to the same loud, inappopriate aural assualt to which he did in his eariler venrture, Sarkar: drums beating, voices hollering, strings being violently and unforgivingly plucked, et cetera. Looking up at the screen, I saw the livid tone encompass the frame, and assumed that the next hour and forty-five minutes or so would present me with the same dull, artsy-fartsy tripe that had Varma's failed, Naach. Curiously, about twenty minutes into Nishabd, I forgot to even reprimand myself for my cruel negativity. I was too enthralled, instead, by just how fittingly and flowingly everything had been stitched together by my director. The blues, the scenery, the camera angles; the music — it was all just working so well. Not only was Nishabd dawning on me as a "technical" acheievement, however.

Any phenomenal movie is only as good as its actors. Nishabd is a film that rests, very largely, on the commercially-inexperienced, nubile shoulders of Jiah Khan. If Lolita was a story about a man's actions toward a girl, then Nishabd may be seen as a movie about "Jia"'s affects of "Vijay." Jia is the aggressor; Jia is the cause of events' transpiring; Jia is the girl who causes and drives the plot, and so very much, indeed, rests of Jiah Khan's ability to portray Miss Jia. Initially, I thought the film would be doomed, as I could stand neither Jiah Khan nor her cocksure, flippant, seemingly typically-unnecessarily "pissed off" rendition of Jia. As did the score and the blue filter grow on me, so, too, did the aptness of Jia and her traits. I shortly fell to realize that I wasn't meant to be fond of Jia; she didn't exist for me to fall in love with. The purpose of Jia was to fly into Vijay's life and tie him in his rapture, and I soon accepted that she, as played, was wholly capable of honoring this task. Jia challenged, excited, and rejuvenated Vijay; as he, in his own words, put it, she "took him away from nearing death." As such, Jiah Khan did everything she should have done, and then whatever more was needed to make it believable. Varma was wise not to venture too far into making her just an element to push the plot, as well. As are all the characters in his work, Jia, too, is a realized, tangible human being: more annoying than sweet, but not at all cold and heartless, either.

Revathi and Rukhsar get the two "smaller" parts, but neither's presence goes at all unfelt. The former is pitch-perfect as Amitabh's wife. Again, owed to the direction and the writing, as well as to the sheerly impressive performance, Revathi comes off as an entirely sympathetic human being. She doesn't blow her gaskets to screaming, deafening music (as do characters in far too many Indian melodramas); she doesn't take an abrupt, unconvincing dislike to Jia at the most oppurtune of moments in the script; she doesn't react to Vijay's actions as only the "part-in-a-play wife" would. She is what one would expect a woman in her (character's) situation to be: kind and restrained, followed by unconsolably horrified and grief-stricken. Likewise, Rukhsar — who's given a decent bit to do post-intermission — is everything she should be as Vijay's daughter. No insipid, cracking voice screaming "I hate you! I hate you!" through a flurry of menthol-induced tears; no storming out of one room and into another to weep atop a perfectly-fluffed pillow — just disbelief and ineffable despair.

Amitabh Bachchan is so magnificent that his name needs to start off a new paragraph (well, Revathi and Rukhsar, also, did that, but you get the point). Earlier this year, Vidhu Vinod Chopra couldn't stop raving about Bachchan's "career's best": his film's eponymous protagonist, "Eklavya." It was a very good performance, and it was a good movie, and neither was anything more. Ram Gopal Varma has said relatively little about Nishabd, and not much more regarding Amitabh's work in the film, and — not even having given Bachchan a brand-spankin' new car before the Page-3 columnists, all — has come up with not only a sublime film, but has given us one of Amitabh Bachchan's finest, most memorable performances in some time. Anytime a film or an actor is great, it makes every film, every performance of that actor, that came before seem mediocre, inferior by comparison. Nishabd has the fortune of being one of these types of films, and Bachchan's work as Vijay is the type that almost makes one forget that one has already loved Bachchan as "Vijay" so many times before, in so many films past, and makes one discover his amazing talent and unparalleled skill all over again. Nishabd's "Vijay" is not Agneepath's, "Vijay Dinanath Chauhan" or Black's, "Devraj Sahai." Those are both great roles (the former, the best performance ever, by anyone — I'm sticking to that), but they're great in a different way, in an "acting" way. Nishabd's Vijay is the sort of performance you see and wonder about: "It was great, but it wasn't really acting... was it?" It's just so damned real, so fucking believable, that one forgets that Amitabh is, indeed, performing. He's not a photographer; he's not an atheist; he's not actually pleading the case of a man aged sixty years' being in love with a woman aged eighteen: he's acting, only he's just doing a mind-bogglingly astounding fucking job. Easily, this is one of Bachchan's best "post-Mohabbatein" films and performances. In fact, perhaps his work in Aks is the only other from this era that I'd place alongside his work in Nishabd. Now, as I said, every time one sees something truly great, one is momentarily compelled to deem "crap" all that came before it, to forget how positively one felt about the other "great" stuff that one saw not too long ago. I just got back from the theater, and I'll probably grant Khakee and Dev and Deewaar (the movies, and Amitabh therein), and all the others worthy, their just deserts soon enough. For the moment, however, Bachchan, and his true greatness in Ram Gopal Varma's Nishabd, have just left me a tad spellbound.

Altogether, Nishabd is an excellent bit of celluloid achievement. It doesn't endorse paedophilia or propel immorality, or do any of the other crap that people have been accusing it (without, of course, having watched it [they said the shit before the film even came out for the critics to review]) of doing. It's a smart, tight, as-close-to-perfection-as-any-movie-should-ever-wish-to-come piece of filmmaking. And if that doesn't do it for you, just go to watch it for Amitabh Bachchan: it'll be worth it.

*One disappointment: "Rozana Jiye," brilliantly and captivatingly sung by Amitabh Bachchan, is not actually anywhere in the film. Watch it as many times as you want in the promotions of the movie, because it's not even played over the ending credits, as are so many songs, nowadays, in Hindi films. Yes, the tune is used as a letimotif throughout the picture, but the actual song makes no appearance. The positive side of that? It benefits the film. The song doesn't make sense at the very end, and is even less fitting at the beginning. It could have been thrown in somewhere near the later part of the second half, but — reasonably "appropriate" though it might have been — it still would have felt unnecessary and pace-slackening. I'll give Varma this much: It takes guts and conviction to leave out a song that good just to make a movie that's closer to his vision. For having those guts and that conviction, I sincerely applaud him. I only hope that the number is available on the DVD release of the movie.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Taran Adarsh's "Review"
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
It seems to me that Taran Adarsh's "review" of Nishabd is more a put-down of the "conservative Indian masses" than an expression of his own opinion of the film. Yes, he gets around to saying, basically, that the film's "not great" (not a quotation), but I can't get past his sagacious little conviction of what the "aam junta," the "holloi polloi" (he doesn't say that one in this review) will be able to handle. I just find it such a snotty perspective. :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
To be honest, I'm not expecting much with this film, but when have I ever! I sure hope it's not a copy of Lolita, otherwise I won't go to see it out of protest. :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Mr_Khiladi, worry not: it's not a "copy" of Lolita (the book, or either film); it's not even something one would have to respectfully acknowledge as a piece "inspired by" anything. Not to build your hopes up to whence they might crash and burn, but it really is a great, great movie.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
how about copy of VENUS :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Nope. I've seen Venus, and I like it; I love Nishabd. Also, it's impractical to say that Nishabd takes anything directly from Venus, as the latter came out near the end of 2006, and shooting for the former began mid-2006. I think Varma has said that he got the idea for his project when he heard about Bachchan's Cheeni Kum, but, judging just from the trailer of that film, the two movies look to have very little in common in terms of execution.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
BO STATUS:

Nishabd is a total loss
Ram Gopal Varma's Nishabd fails to create any ripples.
It opens to very poor response and appreciation. The film is a total loss.

Note: Films are ranked according to their release dates.









Nishabd

Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Jiah Khan, Revathy, Shraddha Vyas.
Director: Ram Gopal Varma.
Great performances, tight first half.

Abrupt after the interval.

Number of weeks: New.
BO Verdict: Very poor response.
Review

*** May be you can make your thread title to reflect other, critics reviews/BO etc?

List GURU..AVERAGE and EKLAVYA..COMMERCIAL FAILURE? what da heck category is dat?

http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2007/mar/05box.htm

imho, these films should be called CHRONICLES OF BIG B, with diff espisodes showing director's vision of him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
arsh wrote:
BO STATUS:
Nishabd is a total loss
Ram Gopal Varma's Nishabd fails to create any ripples.
It opens to very poor response and appreciation. The film is a total loss.


I really can't be bothered with Indian audiences as they've been known to make great films flop and crappy films into Box office super-hits. I'm not concerned with how well or bad Nishabd does in India, I just want to see if it really is a good film and not as pretentious as it looks. The promo showing the Lolita-inspired playing with the water-hose scene was off-putting for me. I would like to see some real originality and creative input from Mr Varma.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
My suggestion, then, would be that you buy a ticket to Nishabd. I, too, didn't expect anything amazing after seeing the commercials; the movie looked a bit artsy and overly "average." Soon enough, though, as I was sat actually watching the film, I found that I was absolutely enthralled by it. I haven't "loved" Ram Gopal Varma in some time, and can honestly say that, with Nishabd, he simply won back my respect. I actually kind of want to watch his re-make of Sholay now...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bolly ... 305-2.html

Critics divided over Ramu’s 'Nishabd'
05th Mar 2007 17.05 IST
By ApunKaChoice

Ram Gopal Varma’s film ‘Nishabd’ has got diverse reactions from critics. While some have called it Ramu’s best work till date, others have panned the movie outright.

Just when the naysayers were claiming that the best of Ram Gopal Varma is well past him, the filmmaker has returned with his movie ‘Nishabd’. Given its unconventional theme, the movie, expectedly, has got a very poor box-office opening. But box-office is not a yardstick to judge a film’s quality. It only gauges its popularity with masses.




Critics, whose job it is to dissect and evaluate, are apparently divided over ‘Nishabd’. Noted film critic Subhash K Jha has given the film four stars out of five.

In Jha’s own words, the film “leaves you speechless”.

“The luminous language of 'Nishabd' makes you grope for new words to describe the experience of watching a film that unfolds like the petals of a wild but tender flower…Nishabd elevates the traditional language of cinema to the plane of unrhymed poetry.”

Our own AKC critic has given the film four stars out of five. (You can check the movie review at Nishabd .)

On the other hand, trade analyst and critic Taran Adarsh has given the film just two stars. Adarsh found the movie too slow in the second half.

“The penultimate reels are a downer. The man cannot erase Jiah from his memory and the film ends on this note. Besides being a bold ending, it comes across as too abrupt,” writes Adarsh.

Another critic Rajiv Masand more or less agrees with Adarsh. Masand, too, found the movie slow in parts but he says the slow pace adds to the feeling of loneliness, which the film is about.

“A compromise ending to a bold, brave story. For the most part, Nishabd is watchable because it's held together by a truly awe-inspiring performance by Amitabh Bachchan,” writes Masand.

Film critic Nikhat Kazmi believes that Nishabd ‘might’ have “ended up as landmark cinema if Ramu had dared to break the mould a bit more and not been wary of the moral police.”

On the other hand, rediff.com critic Raja Sen found ‘Nishabd’ “a powerful film”.

“Overall, Nishabd is a powerful film -- more than you might initially think. It humanises a strong, scandalous subject and succeeds in making it alarmingly commonplace, extremely possible,” writes Sen.

In a television interview, Amitabh Bachchan himself has said that he was surprised to see that Ramu has made “such a sensitive film”.


Really, f*** critics and audiences: There are innumerable shit-chunk movies that do tremendously well at the box office, and about as many that somehow manage to "win over" a fair quantity of so-called film critics. Likewise, many a truly great movie has gone unnoticed, or even maligned, by both movie-goers and film reviewers, pissing off to no end those who've loved them. It's all subjective. No Entry grossed more than any other film in 2004, and Veer-Zaara was praised beyond belief by http://www.PlanetBollywood.com; I hated the former, and only liked the latter. I loved Swades and I now love Nishabd, and that neither's gotten the sort of accolades — commercially or "critically" — that I feel each deserves. I suggest people watch the films they're interested in, and make up their own minds as to how they feel about them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 8:47 pm
Posts: 117
Fabulous post commando......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
aby2000 wrote:
Fabulous post commando......


Are you being sarcastic, Aby2000? Sorry, but every time I see ellipsis marks next to a compliment, I think sarcasm — :lol: . If not, thanks very much — 8) .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 8:47 pm
Posts: 117
Commando303 wrote:
aby2000 wrote:
Fabulous post commando......


Are you being sarcastic, Aby2000? Sorry, but every time I see ellipsis marks next to a compliment, I think sarcasm — :lol: . If not, thanks very much — 8) .



LOL.....its a genuine compliment :) I am so tired of people writing amateur stuff on the movie.....and the negative reviews from the critics are mostly based on the fact that the physical aspect of the relationship is not focussed on......other than that they are all praise for it, especially the performances, yet they still give it a low rating.....! My friends have even said that AB's performance is better than black....and that says alot and i am hoping to catch the movie this weekend coz it only opens up this weekend........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Well, then, I thank you for the compliment. Indeed, I, too, think that Amitabh Bachchan's performance in Nishabd might be "better" than that which he gave in Black; this said, they are two very different "types" of performances, given in two very different "types" of movies. Please do post your thoughts once you've seen the film. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group