Shahran Sunny Audit wrote:
Yuvan wrote:
why can't ayngaran get all their discs to look like this?

With our technical background we were able to ensure the film was presented from an uncompressed D6 source. Had we used a D5 source, the film would have had more compression problems then what is seen on the current DVD.
Why? D5 compression is so much better than DVD at the highest rate that I find it hard to believe that you can see any difference. I have heard talk about HD-DVD showing D5 limits at high bit rates with VC-1, but not MPEG2 on DVD. So did you see compression problems on D5 visible on DVD (which adds another layer of compression problems on top) that went away with D6?
Quote:
Ayngaran have recently released Godfather and Vallavan (both rubbish films) from camera negatives that underwent a 4K transfer, via the sprit datacine.
There certainly was no 4K transfer. At best the Spirit sampled internally at 4K and then output downsampled HD 1080p (2K makes no sense for creating a HD master only). A 4K chain is way too expensive for video mastering.
Quote:
The transfers are all supervised by the film director (or cinematographer), and the datacine operator has perfect 20/20 vision to avoid any colour problems, as seen on all Hindi DVD titles made from DI source, including the recent Don and Rang De Basanti DVDs.
What has 20/20 vision got to do with color problems? If the colors are correct on the DI it's a matter of mapping to the HD color space which means some colors have to be approximated. As long as the guy has normal color vision and properly calibrated monitors he should be able to do the job right. If colors need to be tweaked further it's an artistic call first, not a vision problem. The 20/20 vision thing makes sense concerning sharpening, DNR filtering and compression since here you need to be able to see artifacts of all kinds on sometimes small monitors that hide them.
Quote:
The quality is so now good that we can to see flaws made during production, such as; out-of-focus shots, fingerprint on lenses, incorrect exposures settings, negative markings, poor blue screen keying, negative roll ons etc…
That you can often see on (good) DVDs too. Even Indian DVDs from Eros etc. And on HD there is no hiding anyway. HD on HD-DVD or BR with a good encode shows so much that it is already a big issue concerning film grain with one faction asking for the grain to stay (since that is how the film was shot and made) and the other demanding a clean video look since grain is 'bad'. The second faction is clueless but probably the majority. If the studios cater to them, bye bye film look, hello HD cam look, bye bye film heritage, hello high tech revisionism.
Quote:
I have been informed that Vettaiyadu Vilaiyadu has been released on HD-DVD for the Dubai region only. It was made from the same D6 master, on a single layer (15GB). Hopefully, it would have removed all the compression problems the DVD-9 version had due to lack of space. I should get my copy soon and report back to this forum.
What is the rationale of producing something for the Dubai region only? A rich Dubai sponsor paying for the mastering and pressing? Was VC-1 used? Who mastered the disc? Sales URL? How can I get a copy?
Quote:
PS) I have managed to see a preview of EROS forthcoming HD titles (like Shabd & Mughal-E-Azam) and their quality is just as bad as the DVD version, but at a frame-size of 1280 x 1024. Looks like they are using the same masters made for the DVD versions...
They are releasing on HD-DVD or BR or the Chinese disc? Not that it matters if they release Digibeta quality upsampled to a weird resolution. Well, DCH will be real 1080p.