kchan wrote:
DragunR2 wrote:
I liked Anniyan, but somehow I don't think people will be inspired to do anything better because of it.
You think people will be inspired to do better after watching some art film? The basic nature of people will never change...no matter how great a movie is. At least Anniyan creates an awareness of the problems..
I'm not saying that art films will necessarily inspire anyone to do anything either, but the good ones like Swades will at least spark some sort of discussion among those who saw it, even if they didn't like it. Whereas Shankar's films are all SONGS ACTION MELODRAMA FLASH
social message MORE ACTION MORE MELODRAMA MORE FLASH.
Quote:
Quote:
The only thing Shankar's financial success shows is that people want to be entertained at the box office. McDonald's is probably the most commonly seen food chain in the world, but that doesn't mean their food is any good.
Of course, Mcdonald's food is "good" in a sense...otherwise why would so many people go and eat "bad" food. similarly if so many people were entertained by Anniyan, it must be "good" in a sense. Its not like people in India don't have an option to watch good english action films.
McDonald's seems appealing, yes, but its utterly forgettable food (at best) and unhealthy junk at worst.
I liked Anniyan, but that's despite its flaws. At least in Anniyan the message was LESS buried in the noise than in Shankar's other films. The scene in the arena highlighted the problem again before the end of the film. I did enjoy the vicarious thrill of seeing jerks getting their comeuppance, and the message itself was admirable, but Anniyan is first and foremost an entertainer, and not really a serious film on corruption and people's lack of common courtesy.