It is currently Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:35 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Doh! I thought I'd seen it before someplace :oops: :lol:

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
:lol: :lol: :lol:

No worries .. I edited your post with the original :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
arsh wrote:
ali wrote:
:shock: Eros DVD looking half decent shocker.

Ali
:shock: MY JAW IS DROPPED! :roll: :?: :idea:


I wonder how do you judge it half decent??
Agreed, there are some good frames (2 out of 5), but the rest of the frames are blurry due to field averaging.
I wonder, should we capture just the good frames or 5-6 cosequitive frames from a moving sequence?? 5-6 consequitive shots, from any action sequence, give clear indication, what percent of the frames are good/ bad.

-----------------------------

It's neither fully field averaged, nor fully Pseudo-Progressive (definitely not Progressive). It's a new breed. Two frames are not field averaged (these will give good captures) and the next three are field averaged.

-----------------------------

mhafner wrote:
2:3 pulldown or frame averaged? That red turban is way too saturated.


No 2-3 pull down available because of field averaging in 60% of the frames.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
It is a perfectly screwed up dvd from a EXTREMELY GOOD SOURCE! :twisted: :evil: :shock:

mhafner to comment! What the heck with framing????what :twisted: did with it? Lulla! teri tou :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
ali bhaii what happened to screen shots I sent?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
Thanks to Arsh Bhai for these shots!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Thnx for the screenshots
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 8:04 pm
Posts: 87
Thnx for the screenshots, what are in song compilations?

-Munna


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
naqvi225 wrote:
Thnx for the screenshots, what are in song compilations?

-Munna


advertisement to buy their crappy compilations released :evil: :x :lol:

This time your dodgy lulla seth, has given us NON ANAMORPHIC WS TRANSFER TO FIT IN ANAMORPHIC FRAME BY PSEUDO FORMATING /STRETCHING! :twisted: :evil:

Ladies and Gents this is another Low standard set by Eros! They found another trick to play with your sweet $20


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Menus
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 8:04 pm
Posts: 87
They really could've done a better job with their menus. It looks too plain. :?

-Munna


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I watched the film finally, courtesy of great xeros dvd!

VIDEO is a total screwed up from a very very good Orig source!
I dont understand how by hook or crook Zeros F***** this up!

DD sound was extremely good with a lot of channel seperation and very nice lower end bass punch! except on the song Barsa re, where Chorus got back dropped as it was not put in extra/seperate channels and main voices over shdow that.
beyond that I can understand as few dialogues were totally seperated in side/rear channels, so if you dont have 5.1 set up(true) then those might seem to be in back ground,weak and barely audible..I think!


Now the film,:5/10

It is SLOW/BORING/OVER EXUBERANT/SAROOK ASS LADDEN FAIRY TALE(TAIL)imho!
SAROOK seem misrable and total misfit despite all that jewelery, expensive neklaces, huge turbans and expensive, silk brocade, keemkhab matching dhoti dresses, neela, peela, laal, hara, kasni..whatever!

Rani..well what can I say, she is THE BEST YOU GUYS got! :roll: :(

Only thing that stands out is Ravi Chandran's some good camera work.

Overall, imho, it is failure on part of Amol palekar as a director who just by going easy/sarook/huge exuberant way has turned down a film that could be classy/class/classic like Lekin into another JADOO BHARA MHN!

SFX might be the best ever in Indian film? but imho, that crow to squirrel, to ble bird, to crow was cheesy , yuk as it could be!

Narration by Naseer/Ratna was awful, thanks to a LOUSY SCRIPT and very very low class dialogues!

It was sinful to ABUSE, Sunil, JUHI, Rajpal Yadav /Amitabh(with long legs/short Farak..my god) just for publicity of the film for sarook production.

BOTTOM LINE, IT WAS A POTENTIALY CLASSIC THAT WAS LOST IN TRANSLATION THANKS TO PALEKAR/SAROOK team!

THey must have got their money back, based on Sarook/rani combo on plate, but film is a LET DOWN to creativity and Amol Palekar if he thinks he represents one!

Dialogues, no hindi, no rajasthani, some where hanging in between, depending upon actors capabilities are custom tuned, e.g Sarook seems lousy with rajasthani dilect while even in brief comeo Asif sheikh was very competent,.even anupam Kher could not carry it well, and Big B Sir like always take 5 minute things phony trying to make it as phony /unnatural as he can! Man that last 5 minute climax AB+2 SAROOK display was unbelievable!!

Some one commented that ALL hindi films should be like PAHELI! :roll: well, thats why they are all/mostly crap!thanks to your wishes coming true!

***may i request if some video gurus, like mhafner, dragu, rana, nath etc etc can give us their take on this UNIQUELY FORMATTED ZEROS CLASSIC DVD :?: :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Every scene, I would wish, the film would be made when Anil Kapoor was saleable! :( as he was infron of my eyes all the time from Lamhe!

A film, combined Lamhe, Lekin would be perfect blend though!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 8:14 pm
Posts: 1086
Rita wrote:
Here’s my take on Eros Paheli going by my observations of screenshots provided here at Zulm- Gurus correct me if I’m wrong. :wink:

Print quality looks definitely stretched, grain reduction artifacts and pixels evident, digital intermediate not up to par, poor washed out colors and contrast is dark and not sharp enough, cinematography doesn’t appear to be anamorphic. Lines apparent on screen, motion shots (force weave) looks blurry. Very bad print imo.
Btw, Sarook looks old too.


The colors on the digital intermediate are good. If the DVD has a problem it happened later.
Grain reduction artifacts are part of the digital intermediate, and some digital sharpening too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 1:46 am
Posts: 364
Location: NEW ALBANY, OH, U.S.A
Rita wrote:
Btw, Sarook looks old too.

Now can we blame Eros for that :D :o :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:21 pm
Posts: 570
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
I don't think he looks old in PAHELI. Yes, I did find him looking old in KAL HO NAA HO (due to his back surgery) and VEER-ZAARA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Anwar wrote:
I don't think he looks old in PAHELI. Yes, I did find him looking old in KAL HO NAA HO (due to his back surgery) and VEER-ZAARA.


I agree!! He was NA FIT mostly for the role, Budha or not it was not that much an issue here!

No doubt in VZ Sarook looks like an getting old Gaylord :lol:

Mhafner, I can understand that DI was very good, but what happened to this dvd shit?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group