It is currently Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:31 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Pinjar Movie Review
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:21 am
Posts: 539
Location: Australia
Pinjar

By Taran Adarsh

Recreating history on celluloid can be as tough as catching a whale in deep ocean. Besides the financial ability to make your dreams come true, you also need to get the facts right. And achieving the results can prove to be a Herculean task.

Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi's PINJAR, based on Amrita Pritam's novel of the same name, is an honest effort at recreating history.

PINJAR, produced by Lucky Star's Entertainment Ltd., depicts riots, mayhem, human sufferings and hope.

During the partition, full-scale riots broke out in which lakhs of families were displaced overnight. Thousands of helpless women were raped and kidnapped as communal and political tensions let loose in the Indo-Pak border villages.

The story revolves around five principal characters –

Puro [Urmila Matondkar] is a victim of circumstances. An unfortunate incident changes her life forever… Rashid [Manoj Bajpai] has committed an unpardonable crime… Ramchand [Sanjay Suri] is engaged to Puro. But loses everything – his family, his beloved, his riches… Laajo [Sandali Sinha] is married to Trilok [Priyanshu Chatterjee]. Her life takes a dramatic twist during the partition riots… Trilok is torn between relationships within the family.

PINJAR succeeds on various levels –

The ambience is so life-like that the viewer is immediately transported to the pre-independence era, when the seeds of partition were sown.

The characters seem straight out of life. The Hindu-Muslim divide, the revenge, the helplessness, the bond between parent and child, amongst siblings as well, right to the traditions, rituals and beliefs of that epoch – seldom has the pre-independence era been depicted with such precision.

Ramesh Sippy's television epic BUNIYAAD depicted that era with meticulousness when aired in the 1980s. Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi's big-screen adaptation of Amrita Pritam's novel is another shining example of Bollywood coming of age.

Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi chooses a difficult story for his big screen debut. Fortunately, he gets it right on all fronts, barring two aspects. But more on that later!

Besides conveying the anguish and trauma of a young girl with utmost precision, Dwivedi unfolds a saga without bowing down to commercial dictates. Besides exploring the era with flourish, Dwivedi also succeeds in creating the right atmosphere for the actors to slip into their roles.

There's no denying that Dwivedi is an exceptional story teller. The film depicts history in the right perspective – not once does the narrative take a stand against any community or religion. Also, thankfully, there's no Pak bashing this time around!

But, as pointed out earlier, the film slips intermittently on two counts –

One, the excessive length of the film [20 reels; 3-hour plus duration] would certainly tax the patience of the viewer. Towards the second half specifically, the narrative tends to get lengthy, making it look like a never-ending saga. Deleting a song or two and even a few sequences would only sharpen the narrative.

The second drawback is co-related to the above-mentioned point. The pace of the film drops before the pre-climax, when Urmila makes an effort to rescue Sandali from the clutches of a Muslim family. Re-editing/trimming these portions would only help.

However, the climax, the culmination of the saga, is the best part of the enterprise. The finale is apt – emotional by nature and perfect in the context of the story. The sensitive handling of the climax and the brilliant portrayal by the principal artistes stays in your heart even after the show has ended.

Music [Uttam Singh] is mellifluous; it gels well with the period look. 'Watna Ve' is the pick of the lot, more so because of its rich lyrical value. Cinematography [Santosh Thundiyil] is of international standards. It gives the film the look of an epic. The locations also succeed in taking you to that period.

Dialogues [Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi] are brilliant. Ranging from poetic to acidic to patriotic, the dialogues add sheen to the enterprise. Costumes and sets [Muneesh Sappel] deserve a special mention as well.

Performance-wise, PINJAR rests on two strong shoulders – Urmila Matondkar and Manoj Bajpai. Urmila transforms into Puro with such correctness that it's impossible to believe that it's an actress portraying a part. She is so believable. With PINJAR, besides BHOOT, the actress not merely takes a step forward, but plunges ahead with a giant leap.

Manoj Bajpai is outstanding in a role that seems tailormade for him. After Bhiku Mhatre in SATYA, this is yet another performance that is sure to win him awards, rewards [more film assignments] and bouquets [fan following].

Priyanshu is first-rate, making you realise that here's a reservoir of talent that needs to be tapped. Sanjay Suri is excellent – controlled, subdued and likeable. Here's an actor who deserves to be picked up by qualitative film-makers.

Sandali Sinha is efficient, slipping into her part with ease. Isha Koppikar doesn't get much scope. Seema Biswas is wasted. Lillete Dubey and Kulbhushan Kharbanda, as Urmila's parents, are natural to the core.

On the whole, PINJAR caters more to the thinking audience. Also, it's for those who like period fares. At the box-office, its business will vary from circuit to circuit, with multiplexes at metros fetching better dividends. However, clash of four films in the same week and also the beginning of the Ramzan period after a few days will make a dent in its business.

Most importantly, the business may get affected due to its excessive length. A substantial amount of revenue would be lost due to the theatres performing three shows daily, instead of four shows.

However, despite the shortcomings, fact cannot be denied that PINJAR is a film worth watching!

Rating:- * * *.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 6:21 am
Posts: 539
Location: Australia
Rediff Review


Partition is one of India's most explored themes, more so the partition of Punjab. The rending of the Land of Five Rivers into two parts, solely because one side had a Muslim majority while the other had a Hindu one divided a people who were Sikh, Muslim and Hindu, but who were also Punjabi with a mostly common culture.

Pinjar (Skeleton) is based on a novel by Amrita Pritam. After you see the film, what lingers is the feeling that it is a compelling tale worthy of narration, worthy of being made into a movie.

All too often, Bollywood treats scriptwriters as extras who must be tolerated; the singular belief is that a movie will sell if one puts together a good star cast, story be damned. Pinjar will hopefully change that ridiculous notion; a good story is paramount and can overcome a variety of shortfalls in the movie's narrative.

Pinjar, which is set in the Partition era, is about the sad position women occupied in our society then, and continue to occupy today. Even when she is the victim of a crime, the woman is the one who is blamed. She must pay the penalty so that the family's izzat (honour) is not tainted.

Puro (Urmila Matondkar), daughter of the wealthy Mohanlal (Kulbushan Kharbanda) and his wife (Lillette Dubey), leads a happy life in Amritsar. Her family returns to its village, Chatwal, west of Amritsar, where her marriage is arranged with Shyamlal's (Alok Nath, once again essaying the quintessential Punjabi lala) son, Ramchand (Sanjay Suri).

Puro's dreams of a happy future are shattered when, one evening, she is kidnapped by Rashid (Manoj Bajpai). He is looking to settle a family score that goes back two generations.

Rashid, who has by now fallen in love with Puro, confines her to his house in the same village. When he tells her they are getting married, a desperate Puro manages to escape.

But an even crueler fate awaits her: her parents tell her they cannot take her back. When a heartbroken Puro heads to the village well, she finds Rashid waiting to take her home. They get married but for, Puro, this marriage is akin to death. She wastes away, becoming a pinjar (skeleton) who exists but has ceased to live.

Elsewhere, in a continuing effort to save the family izzat, Puro's sister Rajjo (Ishaa Koppikar in a cameo that goes beyond item songs) is offered in marriage to Ramchand. But, in a deviation from the book, Ramchand does not agree, so Rajjo is married to Ramchand's cousin, while Puro's brother, Trilok (Priyanshu Chatterjee), marries Ramchand's sister, Lajo (Sandali Sinha).

Puro cannot forget Ramchand and her family and dreams of being re-united with them. Trilok, who has never given up his search for his sister, returns to Chatwal. He soon finds out that she was kidnapped by Rashid and burns Rashid's farm, destroying the harvest. Rashid is broken but refuses to seek revenge, pointing out that if someone's sister had been kidnapped, this was the least he would do in anger.

Partition is announced and everyone's world comes crashing down. Ramchand's family is forced to flee eastwards, towards India. On the way, they are attacked by a Muslim mob and a pregnant Lajo, who had returned to her parental home to deliver her first child, is kidnapped by a Muslim.

Puro meets Ramchand at a refugee camp for Hindus and he pleads with her to find his missing sister. Rashid promises to help Puro so that he may redeem himself in her eyes. Puro finds the kidnapped Lajo and helps her escape safely back to her family. The scenes that follow form the climax of the film.

Some aspects of the movie jar on the nerves. Right at the beginning, when the subtitle says the period is August 1946, there is a reference to Viceroy Mountbatten (the viceroy then was Wavell). Also, it would appear that the only reason the movie begins in August 1946 is to show scenes of communal carnage, with a reference to the Direct Action Day (August 16, 1946).

The first half is too full of songs, all part of the need to show a happy family preparing for the daughter's marriage. Alas, marriage scenes -- which offer the director a good opportunity to insert songs and have his cast prance about in designer wear -- seem to have become compulsory in Hindi films. While a few songs are perhaps inevitable, too many detract from the film's overall effect.

Hindi films also find it difficult to handle scenes of joy and grief. To show joy, we have an overdose of songs, Urmila pouting at her brother, ridiculous references to bhaiya and the cast running around in circles. To show tragedy, there is an overdose of tears and melodrama. Nowhere are the emotions shown without exaggeration; in the end, they take away from the storyline and the movie instead of adding to it.

The scenes that show Puro dressed as a typical Muslim salesgirl in the second half are overdone. Worse, the film races through what should have been its most taut and suspense-filled section; the way Puro enters the home where Lajo is being kept prisoner, the way she finds her alone a day later, and the way Lajo is whisked to safety at night without any trouble are all too glib.

But I would reserve the strongest criticism for the climax. In the end, Puro has to make a choice between Rashid and Ramchand. She makes the choice, but the audience is not made to understand her decision. The reason that motivates her decision is missing. This is a grave error and leaves the viewer wondering why she does what she did.

If anyone deserves full marks, it is Muneesh Sappel. His sets are excellent and he has recreated the 1940s with such flair. The faded posters of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the old trucks, etc, truly transport the viewer back some 50-odd years ago. The cinematography captures the landscape wonderfully.

Pinjar is Dr Chandraprakash Dwivedi's debut directorial venture and, at times, the inexperience shows. It is also a brave effort by Urmila Matondkar to break out of the usual Bollywood routine and do a meaningful film. Individually, both have done a commendable job, especially Matondkar who, in parts, truly excels. But there are times when one feels she needed a better director or that Dwivedi needed an actress with greater emoting abilities.

Credits for some fine acting must go to Manoj Bajpai and Priyanshu Chatterjee, both of who deliver excellent performances.

I would rate this movie four stars out of five. Don't miss it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
'Pinjar' acclaimed in Pakistan

By Taran Adarsh, January 28th, 2004 - 0930 hrs IST


Expecting a review of an Indian film in Pakistani media is akin to finding an igloo in Mumbai. Next to impossible, right? But 'Herald', a magazine of repute in the neighbouring country, has not just reviewed a Hindustani film, PINJAR, but has also showered lavish praises.

Excerpts from the review, forwarded to this writer by Dr. Chandraprakash Dwivedi, director of the film:

“PINJAR is that rare Hindi film which outshines its stellar cast. And considering the film employs some highly respected actors, this is no mean feat. A tightly woven plot, multilayered cinematography, remarkable acting and a richly resonant soundtrack are features PINJAR shares with all good films. Lifting the film above average is the fact that it has a soul.

“Unlike other Bollywood films dealing with Partition, however, PINJAR remains focused on the tragedy of the people affected by the event. There's no political gimmickry, anti-Pakistan sloganeering or nationalistic rhetoric.

“Unlike the smash hit GADAR – EK PREM KATHA, which was also based on Partition, the director of PINJAR refrains from exploiting the riot scenes for their incendiary value.

“The few scenes that depict violence are thankfully short and the interplay of various characters is handled with great sensitivity. In the hands of a less talented director, the film could easily have become melodramatic and pedagogical rather than poignant.

“Remembered largely for her brazen dancing and a bimboid paucity of clothes, Matondkar surprises with a superlative performance as the tortured Puro. She is ably aided by her co-stars, especially Bajpai and Suri, but watching PINJAR, one tends to forget that these are actors in the first place.”



*** Movie like this and MAQBOOL r FILM FESTIVAL MATERIAL, but EDITTED to make it no longer than 2-2.30 hrs.

BTW!! some of my relatives saw PINJAR in SINGAPORE, they were REALLY MOVED!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group