It is currently Fri Jan 30, 2026 1:49 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2003 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
kstuart wrote:
To summarize then, DTS DVDs often sound better than the original Dolby DVDs not because DTS encoding is better, but because DTS engineers take more time (they don't have the original DVD deadline) and pay more attention to sound quality.

But how do you explain the reviews where DD and DTS are on the same disc and the reviewer usually gives DTS the edge?

Come to think of it, I do remember reading somewhere that the DTS track of "The Haunting" was made from a 24 bit master, whereas the DD version was from a 16 bit master, or something along those lines.
Top
 Profile  
 
ganti
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 3:45 pm
Posts: 515
Location: columbus
I agree with kstuart to some extent. I often found DTS a bit more clear than DD. Nothing spectacular. I mean when compared to DD you are not gaining a whole lot except in some rare disks.



Edited By ganti on 1042560074
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Ganti, said it right, and dragun's point is valid!! on proper machines, with good channel seperation, high end stuff! 2 things, Dts, might give u advantage, cleaner, better channel seperation and better lower end..0.1!

You can feel the same in MONSOON WEDDING, if u have right equipment! But in absence of DTS, I would be pretty contended with DD OF MW!

If I had to choose between anamorphic video(as I have widescreen display) and DTS! after listening to marginal difference!I would pick former to later!
Top
 Profile  
 
ganti
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 3:45 pm
Posts: 515
Location: columbus
Arsh Bhai,
Quote:
Ganti, said it right, and dragun's point is valid!! on proper machines, with good channel seperation, high end stuff! 2 things, Dts, might give u advantage, cleaner, better channel seperation and better lower end..0.1!

You can feel the same in MONSOON WEDDING, if u have right equipment! But in absence of DTS, I would be pretty contended with DD OF MW!

If I had to choose between anamorphic video(as I have widescreen display) and DTS! after listening to marginal difference!I would pick former to later!


Precisely that's my point also. After all years these people are using DTS as their new gimmick



Edited By ganti on 1042561725
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I am trying to make the same point to murakh public! pls. dont buy a dvd because it has dts!

buy only if it has respectable PQ along with PROPER DD sound, as it deserved...mono, stereo, dolby surround, 5.1(proper)! otherwise take ur money somewhere else!

Would i buy another crappy devdas with extra 30 minute shit and dts...? NO!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Kishi6406
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 11:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 11:50 pm
Posts: 285
I still say that Indian DVD's from now on should get a Hollywood company to do their DVD's. On the big screen, the camera's are horrible, but the vision is clear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group