Kuttappan wrote:
...I would have voted for Terrence Howard, if i haven't seen his other films and bunch of interviews. I really like this guy, when I saw Crash I saw an actor born, when it came to hustle & flow he blew my mind. The best thing about his acting is his voice modulation and face expressions But when I saw few of his other films I found out he has the same voice modulation and expressions. If an actor can't change his voice control and expressions differently in each movie, he is not an oscar award worthy. People will also get tired of his acting because of the same expressions and voice modulation. This is strictly my personal opinion)
I respect your opinion, but isn't one supposed to vote only for the performance in question? I know it never works that way (see my own bias above with Ang Lee), but I believe that's the point about awards - acknowledging the best singular work achieved by an individual in the medium of film. Howard may be repeating himself, but in
Hustle and Flow, I think he is at full force in creating a performance that is utterly transcendent.