It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:37 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 9:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:11 am
Posts: 546
Location: Australia
Boom

By Taran Adarsh


The first question that crosses your mind after having watched BOOM is, for whom has Kaizad Gustad made this film?

Is it for the Indian audience -- the upper strata, the commoners, the hoi polloi? Or is it targetted at the international audience?

Frankly, the kind of film BOOM is, it has precious little to offer to the desis or videshis. It has body, but no soul. It's very high on hype, but very low on substance!

BOOM revolves around three sexy supermodels, Anu [Madhu Sapre], Sheila [Padma Lakshmi] and Rina [Katrina Kaif], who belong to the international world of fashion. They are the best in their field.

A prestigious fashion show, set against the spectacular backdrop of the Gateway of India, goes horribly wrong. Anu trips on the ramp, much to her public embarrassment and along with her two model friends, Sheila and Rina, she even picks up a fight with another model on the ramp itself.

In the ensuing scuffle, this model's hair opens up and hundreds of glittering stolen diamonds, which were due to be smuggled out of the country, fall on the ramp, only to be snatched by the paparazzi and celebrities alike.

The diamonds were stolen by Abdul's [Jackie Shroff] men and were due to be smuggled to Dubai the night of the fashion show. In Dubai, they were to be handed over to his elder brothers in the syndicate.

Saleem [Gulshan Grover] is the go-between, the middle brother; he handles the business side of their underworld operations, answering to Bade Mia [Amitabh Bachchan], the kingpin, the father-figure and the most notorious gangster on India's 'Most Wanted' list.

And Bade Mia wants the diamonds back, come what may!

The drama builds up… The stolen diamonds are priceless antiques and have to be recovered by the gangsters from Anu, Sheila and Rina, as the gangsters hold them responsible for their disappearance.

Will the three gangsters outwit the three models or will the models use their myriad charms to get away?

An interesting plot could've been narrated in a distinct style, like Kaizad Gustad had done in his previous film BOMBAY BOYS. But, strangely, Gustad's style is abstract this time around, which fails to catch the viewer's fancy.

The film starts off pretty well -- the scuffle on the ramp, with diamonds falling all over -- but the introduction of the characters [Jaaved Jaaferi, Jackie Shroff] subsequently throw a spanner in the narrative.

You expect the film to gather momentum once the focus shifts to Bachchan, Gulshan Grover and Zeenat Aman in Dubai. But things don't perk up.

The director, who has been credited with its scripting, projects the underworld in a different light this time. He doesn't follow the realistic route adopted by Ram Gopal Varma [SATYA, COMPANY], Mahesh Manjrekar [VAASTAV, HATHYAAR], Vidhu Vinod Chopra [PARINDA] and Hansal Mehta [CHHAL]. Instead, the bhais in this film are complete weirdos, who behave like buffoons. Nothing wrong with that, but the screenplay is devoid of moments that would keep the audience thirsting for more.

Qualitatively, the film has the works -- an ensemble star cast, stunning locales, sparkling cinematography… but Gustad ought to remember that a moviegoer wants a riveting story to keep you glued for the next two hours, more than anything else.

Although Gustad had exhibited flashes of brilliance in his previous flick BOMBAY BOYS, he seems to have gone completely haywire this time around. There was just no need for so much crudity, vulgarity and skin show in the film. In fact, that would put off the Indian hoi polloi, for it wouldn't gel with Indian sensibilities.

On the flip side, Gustad has focussed more on making a glossy product. The lighting, at times, gives an international feel. Also, the film is visually striking, plus the sound quality is top notch and the background score effective.

Strangely, the performances are not what you expect from an enterprise like this. One wonders what Bachchan -- with his stature and calibre -- found for in a script like this for giving his consent to an insipid role. The veteran has a substantial role [unlike the feeling that he's hardly there!], but the length of any character has nothing to do with the scope to exhibit histrionics. The director has wasted the veteran in a role that could've been essayed by just about anyone.

Zeenat Aman makes a comeback on the silver screen after a hiatus, but in her case too, the script offers nothing but to deliver a few lines monotonously or break into a bizarre jig on the don's table [!!!].

Jackie Shroff has his moments; his sequences with the models are alright. Gulshan Grover is passable. Jaaved Jaaferi plays to the gallery, but there was no need for the director to make him behave so cheaply, so very pedestrian. Some of his mannerisms are in absolute bad taste and makes the film unwatchable with families.

Amongst the models, Madhu Sapre is better of the lot. Katrina Kaif is pure teakwood. Padma Lakshmi also carries one expression throughout. Seema Biswas is fair. Bo Derek is wasted.

Ace designers Tarun Tahiliani, Wendell Rodricks and Rohit Bal should stick to what they are best at -- dress designing. They make lousy actors!

On the whole, BOOM is all hype, no gas. At the box-office, the film has tremendous curiosity value, but that's about it! The film has taken a flying start at the ticket window, but it just doesn't have the sustaining power to hold on the interest after the initial craze subsides. Below average.

Rating:- *.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:38 pm
Posts: 408
I fully expected this. But was hoping not

Review at Rediff

http://www.rediff.com/movies/2003/sep/19boom.htm

First off, Padma Lakshmi looks extra hot, Katrina Kaif looks hot and cute and Madhu Sapre is strictly okay.

As a piece of advice, prepare to tolerate Madhu Sapre minus makeup.

Kaizad Gustad's skin fest Boom has an undoubtedly fabulous lineup: Amitabh Bachchan, Gulshan Grover, Jackie Shroff and other masala mixers to add colour.

As Bade Mia, Bachchan is the champion of the underworld. Medium Mia aka Cutpiece Saleem Suiting Shirting, Gulshan Grover, is another big fish in the sea, but not the biggest. Shroff is Chote Mia aka Abdul 50-50, who operates his elders brother's dark business in Mumbai.

The movie was shot in India, Dubai and Sri Lanka over 63 days.

It is about three beautiful models living and working together. The movie kicks off with a glamorous fashion show at Mumbai's Gateway of India, where egos clash between one skinny model and another. Ace model Anu Gaekwad
(Madhu) is embarrassed by her competitor, in front of the entire crowd. And the ramp turns into a wrestling ring.

In the catfight which follows, Anu pulls her rival's hair and priceless hidden diamonds scatter around to get stolen by photographers and the audience. Now, since the diamonds (or papads as Chote Mia calls them) belong to Bade Mia, he puts a task on Medium Mia to get them back, no matter what.

The task is passed on to Chote Mia who holds the three models responsible. Now, Anu, Sheila (Padma Laksmi) and Reena (Katrina Kaif) are asked to recover the diamonds.

The movie is different, no doubt about it. Writer/director Kaizad Gustad has done a good job. He has not lost his Bombay Boys touch. There are times though when you end up thinking about his old movie.

Lookswise, Anna Singh has given the right attitude to every character. While Amitabh is in all-white and Jackie is in all-black, Medium Mia Gulshan Grover enjoys the flamboyance of colourful clothes.

Yet, the movie lacks punch.

There is too much of flesh and exposure for the audience to concentrate on the plot, which itself isn't too powerful enough.

It is impossible to watch this movie with your family and not shift restlessly in your seat.

Hats off to the music directors of the movie nonetheless. You can expect nothing less from Sandeep Chowta and Talvin Singh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 1:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
One star from Taran - must be a good movie then :oo:

Ali :bash:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 7:30 pm
Posts: 756
Location: canada
review from sify.........

Review


Boom goes bust!



Movie
Boom
Director
Kaizad Gustad
Producer
Ayesha Shroff

Post Your Review
The hype gets over. Boom proves it is nothing more than just the hype and some half-naked bodies. Kaizad Gustad tells the story of how the underworld encounters the fashion world in a unique situation. And look at the way he has spoilt an interesting theme.

Anu Gaikwad (Madhu Sapre), Sheila Bardez (Padma Lakshmi) and Rina Kaif (Katrina Kaif) are three top super models who stay together.

They have excelled in their field and are well known faces in the fashion circuit. During one of the fashion shows, Anu trips on the ramp and holds one of her competitors, Michelle, responsible for this. She immediately picks up a fight with her on the ramp itself.

Michelle is a model who is into smuggling diamonds worth at least Rs 50 crore. Her modus operandi is that she hides the diamonds in her hair to smuggle them across the borders. On the ramp, while Anu picks up a figh with her, her hair gets loose and all the diamonds fall all over the ramp. The celebrities, the lens man and the crowd in general, waste no time in running away with them. Next day, all the newspapers make a huge story out of it. This upsets three dons who were to get the diamonds.

Cut to the three dons: Abdul 50/50 alias Chote Mia (Jackie Shroff), famous for getting 50 per cent out of every deal, Middle Mia (Gulshan Grover) also known as Cut-Piece Saleem Suiting-Shirting and Bade Mia (Amitabh Bachchan), based in Dubai. Chote sends Shankar to hunt for the models responsible for this mess. What happens hereafter forms the rest of the story.

The film starts off on a promising note, but the impact is taken away soon after the entry of Bade Mia. The three models look hot but unfortunately none of them can act. Once the initial base of the story is developed, it is clear that one among the two will outwit the other. And, you tend to sit back and think that there will be a nice cat-and-mouse hunt on.

But to your disappointment, most reels of the film have been wasted on showing skin of the leading ladies and unnecessary situations that have no relevance to the entire narrative.

Further, the three dreaded dons are shown as weird and eccentric. They are nowhere near the routine ones, but then you expect them to come up with at least some good one liners, which are missing from the film.

In spite of such a huge cast, there has been no justice done to anyone of them, be it an actor like Amitabh Bachchan or Zeenat Aman or even the ever-dependable Jackie Shroff. The film is crude and vulgar in some places, while in others, it is plain stupid.

Madhu Sapre comes up with some good scenes, but overall she disappoints. Javed Jafrrey is watchable and so is Gulshan Grover. Seema Biswas has got a couple of noteworthy scenes. Bo Derek and Zeenat Aman are wasted.

Kaizad Gustad has lost his way right from the word go. He is confused to which section of the audience he should actually target. Overall, the film has a major plus point in the form that it has a huge cast that will help it to have the initial collections. Also, the promos have created some amount of curiosity. The masses will like the film due to the hot sequences, but overall the film is disappointing.

The hype that was generated before the release was such that we might have got another good one from Kaizad. Remember Bombay Boys? No doubt, Kaizad doesn’t carry on the charm he oozed in Bombay Boys. Is he another one film wonder? Boom points to that. Sad, really sad.

Kunal Shah
India Syndicate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
They think, these are bad reviews. To me, these reviews are creating even more hype. Sooner the better. Bigger the screen the better. Bigger the sound, the better.

Rana


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 12:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 6:12 am
Posts: 91
i saw boom and LOVED it. these closeminded critics really need to stop thinking that every movie is a "family" movie and start opening theyre closed love story minds to other ideas and different genres of movies. these reviews make me mad and i wasn't even apart of the movie. this movie has class and was made genuinly unlike the rest of the crap that our box office has been seeing these last few months. Nothing i have seen this year compares to the story, acting, or extravagence of this humorous thriller. TARAN ADARSH CAN SUCK IT. he really does NOT know how to write reviews. indiafm should opt with someone with a more open mind and brighter taste...for the best movie critic in india, he's doing a very shitty job...


Anyone agree?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 4:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 12:38 am
Posts: 435
Guaranteed that had this been a Hollywood film, rediff would have loved it. Bunch of pseudos.

It's a good movie. I really liked it myself. The movie was well-made and well-directed. Yes, true, it is mostly style and very little substance (in terms of storyline or script), but, man, what style!

And I disagree with what many of these reviewers are saying. It's very interesting to watch, and the performances from the main cast were great. Javed Jaffrey was hilarious, Amitabh did a great job, Gulshan Grover was good, and Jackie Shroff was suitably disturbing.

The movie is definitely one for mature audiences. If you take your kids to see this film, I question your parenting skills. The movie is full of explitives (including incredibly liberal usage of the f-word) and sex/sexual innuendo. But, if you're mature and modern enough to handle it, it's funny, though definitely questionable as to how this got through the sensor board. I honestly hope this doesn't spell a trend for Bollywood films.

And, btw, special mention to the Burj Al Arab, the hotel in Dubai. Magnificent!

Really, it's worth at least one watch. It's perhaps the weirdest movie I've seen in a long time, but it's worth watching.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 5:57 pm
Posts: 32
taran adesh should go back in the 19th century he never has something encouraging to say he should get a life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 7:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 7:25 pm
Posts: 1799
Location: Sunny Manchester..............
Having watched the movie last nite, I do kinda seem a bit disappointed with Kaizad Gustads attempt at reaching the mass public in india... i dont know if its because the version we saw was the indian release of the movie, but it was very badly censored and edited too... Why oh why do indian movies rely upon a song and dance number in every movie!! The bootleg version i downloaded included many extra scenes, which explained more of the situations in details instead of expecting the viewer to put two and two together... I liked the movie a lot, not just because of AB but because of the humour, the women, the inuendo, Dubai.. and oh yeh AB... JAved Jaffery was hilarious, Jackie the blowjob king was good, Bo Derek - was she even in the movie :keh: Zeenat Amaan was cruel but excellent - especially with the new models.. and the three models.. wow did they look hot... some of the scenes caused people to get up and walk out of the cinema screen in disgust... LOL but who cares!! I got a total grilling by mates after the movie, cos they reckon it was a crap movie, however... to some extent, it was wat i expected... Bombay Boys Style movie telling.. and thats what Boom is.. i just hope the international version (which hopefully will materialise - unlike the international version of Kaante :keh: ) will do more justice to the movie....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 13, 2002 2:38 pm
Posts: 277
Location: New York
I just saw this movie last night and really enjoyed it. While I was with some people who disliked it (including an actor and film company person who had previously worked with the director in the past), I felt that the film was provocative and a really gutsy move at being anti-Bollywood. I'm Chinese-American and I saw the film in NYC without subtitles (it was a mix of Hindi and English). While the film wasn't perfect (and the last third of the movie really sank it downhill), there were some unique moments (the song-and-dance number, a lot of the wide-lens cinematography, Big B and Jackie Shroff's disturbing and brazen performances). And I really felt that I didn't know what was going to happen next from scene to scene. Heck, during much of it, I felt like this guy was reinventing the crime genre black comedy much like Quentin Tarantino did with "Reservoir Dogs." I do wish that the director was a little more disciplined but I guess if he was, he wouldn't be crazy enough to launch what seems like drug-addled, adrenaline-fueled imagery. A definite must-see in my book and one that even a Western audience may appreciate in spots.



Edited By ajy1 on 1064254195


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 7:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 8:47 pm
Posts: 117
Boom: Bad taste, good sense?
By Saibal Chatterjee
September 21

Is Boom as bad a film as some reviewers are making it out to be?

It is easy to hate a film like Boom. For one, it commits the unforgivable crime of pulling one of Bollywood’s greatest icons, Amitabh Bachchan, down from his pedestal and reducing him to a lecherous old gunslinging caricature of a Dubai bhai. Worse, the Big B is made to share virtually equal billing with Gulshan Grover. Is nothing sacred around here anymore?

If that sacrilege isn’t bad enough, director Kaizad Gustad unapologetically piles loads of confusion upon collective agony by completely disregarding the established norms of a “well-made” Mumbai film. Not only is his film’s camerawork completely flipped out, its narrative structure hinges on the firm premise that a narrative structure is an obsolete thing. What cheek!

What does Gustad do? He gives us a film that flits from one scene to another in the manner of a glib video jockey hopping from one song to another. One number may make some sense, but don’t expect it to have any organic link with the next. The playful and stylized Boom zips and zooms about every which way it can like an F1 racer run amok. It’s difficult to make sense of what’s going on especially if you happen to be a moviegoer weaned on Bollywood’s four-sequences-followed-by-a-song-in-the-Alps storytelling style.

And there’s worse in store. Not only does he have the gumption to parade three babes in varied states of undress, Gustad bhai has an obvious penchant for sex jokes as well. Boom flirts constantly – an unabashedly -- with bad taste. Sundry parts of the male and female anatomy are thrust at the audience, discussed threadbare, made fun of, and held up as objects of mirth. If that leaves you in a perpetual squirm, so be it. Boom is designed to do just that.

One particularly outraged reviewer has snapped out an angrily curt order: “Kaizad, please explain!” Let me try on the guy’s behalf. But here’s a rider: these views are strictly the writer’s, so hold Kaizad Gustad responsible only for the film, not this explanation.

Boom is a wild, wacky, whimsical, wicked, weird film shorn of the comfort of linear storytelling. Its irreverence extends to everything: even the camera has the irritating habit of looking down at the characters, or a scene of the action, from wrong, disorienting angles and the editor’s scissors seems to possess a demented mind of its own. Strong reactions are, therefore, inevitable. But the question is: Is Boom as bad a film as some reviewers are making it out to be?

For this writer, the most interesting aspect of Boom has to be the way it tackles the gender divide in its own playful comic-book style. The men in the film have their guns – these weapons indicate their libidinousness as much as they are a measure of their levels of brutality – the women have their bodies and their wits. The men are hopelessly set in their ways; the women are on a constant growth curve. The latter move from point A to B, and then even to C, while the men, trapped in their illusions of power and pelf, are a completely stuck up lot.

The men – Bade Mian, Medium Mian, Chhotey and Boom Shankar -- are all comic strip figures, too full of themselves, stripped of all dignity. The women – the three lost-in-the-woods models, their maid-turned-mastermind Bharti and the cool-as-a-cucumber Alice, Bade Mian’s all-purpose secretary – are in total control despite the dangers swirling around them.

By the end of the film, Kaizad’s surreal universe is cleansed of masculine stupidity. The women – especially the three models who have come a long way – sit back in the lap and luxury and soak in the joys of triumph. Has any Bollywood tale of four men, five women and 30 lost diamonds ever ended quite the way Boom does? Give the devil its due!

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_ ... 110003.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
aby2000 wrote:
It is easy to hate a film like Boom. For one, it commits the unforgivable crime of pulling one of Bollywood’s greatest icons, Amitabh Bachchan, down from his pedestal and reducing him to a lecherous old gunslinging caricature of a Dubai bhai. Worse, the Big B is made to share virtually equal billing with Gulshan Grover. Is nothing sacred around here anymore?

Amitabh is an actor. He should be able to play both good and bad characters. This is an incredibly stupid complaint. It's good that even after all his success he still takes the occasional seedy role like in Boom or Kaante.

When was he put on some pedestal? He made his career with those Salim-Javed action entertainers! :D




Edited By DragunR2 on 1064178610


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 1:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
which version of the movie has more stuff and which is hotter also or are both of the versions the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
izzy wrote:
which version of the movie has more stuff and which is hotter also or are both of the versions the same.

I don't know which version has extra stuff, but I guess it consists of more 'flesh'.

I saw the UK version earlier and they did cut some scenes, that I had seen in preview clips before...for example there was suppossed to be a scene with a girl walking around in a thong...it was nowhere to be seen in the cinema version! I think the kiss scene between Madhu and Jackie was cut short.

As for the film Boom...maybe it sould be re-titiled Boobs. Alot of people didn't seem to realise this is NOT a family film and I saw quite a few people get disgusted with it. I even saw an elderly couple who probably came in to see Mr Bachchan's latest performance! A man in front was worryingly watching his wife reaction everytime the f-word was said and during the 'lusty' scenes.

The swearing was far too overdone, to the point of making it look stupid, but maybe that was Mr Gustad's intention. This is probably his attempt at creating THE (Indian) film where the f-word is used the more than any other.

This film is not to be taken seriously at all, it's very much a spoof-like satire. As far as the models go, they can't act to save their lives, but then again most people were expecting that. Madhu Sapre looked ugly and noticably was the only one with an Indian accent. Katrina Kaif looked very pretty and was easily the best looking out of the three, I don't know if the american accent was natural or she put it on for the film (I heard she was from London). I'm not too sure but a little 'something' seemed to pop out in the scene where she was 'seducing' with Gulshan Grover. :D

AB had given the most different performance of his career...a role you would've never thought you'd see him in. There were some funny scenes like him lying in the pool, riding around and stealing from his own shop, forgetting his kids' names and gender and running after 'Bo' on the beach. A friend remarked that this film could break his and Jackie's film careers for good.

I think the best performance and character was from Javed as Boom Shankar. I found him annoying at first but got to like him thoughout, in the end he stole the show.

Overall the film was more or less what I expected. Entertaining, though it could be disappointing for those expecting too much. But DO NOT watch it with the family!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 5:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
did u watch the hindi version


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group