It is currently Fri Sep 26, 2025 10:58 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 450 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 30  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Maybe Katrina could play Dhanno!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
Mr_Khiladi wrote:
that stupid prison sequence in the directors cut with the hitler lookalike. When I saw the director's cut, I felt sick. How can you may such a great film, so bad?....by adding comedy!.


This sequence is in both, DEI-EROS version a well as in EROS Director's cut version. Was it missing in any of Sholay versions??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:38 pm
Posts: 408
IMo she is just a pretty face. She does not have the screen presence or the stature of Jaya Bacchan and to a lesser extent Hema Malini


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 1:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
rana wrote:
Mr_Khiladi wrote:
that stupid prison sequence in the directors cut with the hitler lookalike. When I saw the director's cut, I felt sick. How can you may such a great film, so bad?....by adding comedy!.


This sequence is in both, DEI-EROS version a well as in EROS Director's cut version. Was it missing in any of Sholay versions??


I haven't seen those DVD's. The version of Sholay I had originally seen was the one shown on Channel 4 in the UK. It was uncut at the time as Channel 4 rarely cuts Indian films unless shown in the daytime. This version had none of the prison sequence and a few other scenes that I had seen later in the directors cut on Zee TV. The Channel 4 version as well as the Zee TV version, had the Gabbar being arrested ending.

But Zee had shown in the late nineties a version of Sholay that was identical with the Channel 4 version, except the ending had Gabbar falling on a spike. This earlier version shown by Zee had none of the comedy or the prison sequence either. Which makes me thing this prison sequence is a later addition.

I don't know what version of Sholay was originally shown in India, but now it seens there are 4 versions of the same film!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 3:24 pm
Posts: 446
Quote:
The new Sholay shouldn't have comedy


I am w/ you dude, the new sholay should be comedy-free

but it is interesting you say that - it is still not clear whether ramu is going to make this a complete commercial entertainer like the original OR if he is going to make this in the usual rgv-style

I seriously hope it is the latter


Quote:
IMo she is just a pretty face. She does not have the screen presence or the stature of Jaya Bacchan and to a lesser extent Hema Malini


ya but you gotta think abt the character

it is obvious that katrina is no jaya (in terms of acting)

but jaya's character in sholay really did not have much to do… I am sure katrina will not have any problems playing the part

and as to who will play hema’s part - my vote goes to nisha kothari :) …she would be perfect


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:38 pm
Posts: 408
Thinking of the dancing on glass set in a more modern setting - Shilpa Shetty come to mind or Priyanka Chopra


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
I wanna drool over Nisha again....I mean.....I wanna see her again :P

as for Comedy, most if not all of RGV films have subtle comedy. Sholay won't be any different?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
RAM PUR KE SHOLAY :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
Mola Ram wrote:
Quote:
The new Sholay shouldn't have comedy


I am w/ you dude, the new sholay should be comedy-free

but it is interesting you say that - it is still not clear whether ramu is going to make this a complete commercial entertainer like the original OR if he is going to make this in the usual rgv-style

I seriously hope it is the latter



From what I heard RGV is going to do it in his style and it will be set in the Mumbai underworld. This sort of film should't have comedy, even subtle comedy may make it look like a black comedy, which shouldn't be the intention as it won't be taken seriously. I don't know how they could do comic moments in such a serious and dark, gritty setting.
Of couse there are going to be those who will be dissapointed already if he doesn't do it as a mass-entertainer, not all filmgoers like his style of film.

RGV has a tendency to latch-onto actors he's just worked with. He did this many times. As Sarkar was his last film, he's roped in AB Jr, AB Sr and Katrina Kaif all from Sarkar. Just like he did Vivek Oberoi and Antara Mali for Comapny and Road. I don't think he's very wise in casting. If this is some funny 'RGV' tradition he follows he should drop it at least for Sholay's sake. If you mess up Sholay it could be the nail on the coffin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 3:24 pm
Posts: 446
hey guys, the latest news is that ramu has got ajay to play veeru!

though saif not doing the part definitely sucks :cry: but I don’t blame the guy, 'omar' seems awesome also

but nonetheless ajay will be a great addition to the cast - the ramu/ajay combo is always awesome

imo the ideal cast would be saif as veer and ajay as jai (just like 'kache dhaage')


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Asrani's "Hum Angrazon ke zamaane ke jailer hain!" sequence is awesome. I love every bit of Sholay, and can only cringe when I imagine the trash that Varma will come up with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
stop imagining it and don't watch it. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 1:14 pm
Posts: 2256
Location: National Capital Region (India)
Urmila Matondkar has been signed on to replay Helen's performance in "Mehbooba Mehbooba".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Yuvan wrote:
stop imagining it and don't watch it. :P


Shut up. Just...shut up. I find it utterly idiotic when people's reponse to "I don't want to see this film re-made" is," don't watch it. It's not valid; it's not sound: it's stupid. I love Sholay; I barely like Ram Gopal Varma. I'm a fan of Indian cinema, and I don't enjoy when some lack of creativity leads to filmmakers' recycling (and, often, trashing) some former classic work. I don't wish Ram Gopal Varma to re-make Sholay. Of course he doesn't "care what I wish" (I feel you might say that); I don't care that he does not. I wish what I wish. Sure, I'll probably see Varma's version, opposed as I may be: it's A DOLLAR of my money — I'll try to bear the loss. That does not, however, indicate my exuberance stemming from Varma's re-making something he cannot possibly re-make successfully (in non-financial terms, that is).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
why is it stupid? There are people that like RGV, and there are people that are looking forward to his films, including remake of sholay! I don't like certain types of films, and I avoid them and/or don't cry about them. there is an audience that they are catering to which I'm not part of. simple as that. what's utterly idiotic is that you want to watch his film even though you say it's a waste of your precious time/money & insult to your classic. why do you have to bear the loss of your precious dollar? nobody is forcing you to watch it. you are contradicting your stance by watching this film.

if you don't like his films, or the fact that he is remaking a classic, just don't watch it. you are going to watch it anyway, probably due to curiosity factor & so that you could rip his bum apart after watching the film so you can rant about how the classic is superior and RGV has done a great injustice. when in fact he probably added life to the film.


another thing is that he is not misleading you like other bollywood remakers. 99% of films that ARE remakes of other films don't give notice to the former films, or awareness to the audience. where do you take the loss in him remaking it?

It's easier for you to channel him out of your mind, and for him to channel out audiences that don't want to watch his films, which is exactly what he does.

as for Urmila, I miss her & I can't wait :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 450 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 30  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group