It is currently Sun Nov 16, 2025 11:47 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Others » Movie, TV, Music and Box-office

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
izzy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
i think the censor bord is stupid why the hell would you want to censor kissing you see people kissing on the street i think they should take out thses old people and put some younger people on the job. in my opinion if they censor kissing i am surprised that the so called "actress" who wears these really tiny tiny short short tight tight closed far worsed for young kids to see than kissing come on u barely dont even see prostitutes wearig those kind of clothes i the west and plus they even show "actresses" wearing them in a family film made by yrf, rajeshwari etc... ex kkhh
by the way i heard khal nayak had so many censor cuts including the song choli ke piche kya hai but ghai had to go 2 court to get it back in the movie and i checked what other parts they cut out but they dont even have khal nayak on the list do any of u know what scence were cut ff for a stupid reason
Top
 Profile  
 
congress
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 11:29 am
Posts: 1028
Location: Singapore
izzy wrote:
i think the censor bord is stupid why the hell would you want to censor kissing you see people kissing on the street i think they should take out thses old people and put some younger people on the job. in my opinion if they censor kissing i am surprised that the so called "actress" who wears these really tiny tiny short short tight tight closed far worsed for young kids to see than kissing come on u barely dont even see prostitutes wearig those kind of clothes i the west and plus they even show "actresses" wearing them in a family film made by yrf, rajeshwari etc... ex kkhh
by the way i heard khal nayak had so many censor cuts including the song choli ke piche kya hai but ghai had to go 2 court to get it back in the movie and i checked what other parts they cut out but they dont even have khal nayak on the list do any of u know what scence were cut ff for a stupid reason

Have you ever heard of any punctuation marks especially full stop. :D
Top
 Profile  
 
izzy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 5:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
2 lazy i do so much at school
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 10:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: Birmingham
If you think those cuts were bad, look at their criteria for certifying movies - if a film has a lip to lip kiss in it, it gets an Adult certificate (total bakwaas of course!)

More cut movies:

Freaky Chakra

Saamurai (Tamil)



Edited By bhaskar on 1049194341
Top
 Profile  
 
congress
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 11:29 am
Posts: 1028
Location: Singapore
I wonder how the four letter words got through the censors in Leela. And I've seen the whole movie on Zee TV without any cuts. I wonder why films are so strictly shown in theaters but are allowed to be shown without cuts on TV where children are more likely to see...
Top
 Profile  
 
Mr_Khiladi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2003 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
India's censorship is a joke. Imagine they censor things like kissing but sex and nudity are there (Ek chotisi love story, Mera Naam Joker, etc).

Not only that but swearing such as 'shit' in KKHH was allowed in the UK version and it was even given a rating of U, meaning suitable for all, which means little kids can go see it without their parents. In the UK, no British or American film will be given a U rating if it contains world like 'shit' or 'b*****', so why do they allow it for Indian films?
Top
 Profile  
 
sknath
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 4:17 pm
Posts: 2853
Location: Canada
Mr_Khiladi wrote:
In the UK, no British or American film will be given a U rating if it contains world like 'shit' or 'b*****', so why do they allow it for Indian films?

Mr Khiladi thats cos Indian Kids are supposed to be Tapori's from a very early age ! :laugh:
Top
 Profile  
 
dograk
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 5:31 pm
Posts: 630
he mutters shit...he doesn't say it in a loud voice....

there's a difference...
Top
 Profile  
 
shuman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 9:07 pm
Posts: 1114
hows everybody doing.. i've been out of there for a while and expecting to see things new. but same ol same ol stuff.

Anyhow, as for censorship in india is concerned, they are very inconsistent making it look meaninglesss to even have some movies cut and others go thru without cut.

i remember Sunny Deol shouting "Fuc* You" and showing fingers in one of the movie, i beleive it was LOOTERE. From which corner would that be suitable for everyone?

and why kissing is censored in movies, there are movies like DIL, PREM-AGGAN, MOHABBATEIN, RAJA HINDUSTANI which has dedicated kiss scenes!! ........ o well...
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2003 1:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
I think I've seen a movie poster on which someone is giving the finger with both hands! Is there no regulation of that? Or do people in India not know that it means "f**k you"?
Top
 Profile  
 
hutbay
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2003 3:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 6:54 pm
Posts: 95
I was checking the CBFC site and it mention all this categories of U ,A,UA, and S. But doesn't explain what it stands for.. Anyone have an Idea?

U - general?
A - Adults - 18 and over
UA - Pg 13?
S -??


Got it.. after few search....

U- Universal Exibhition
A- Restricted to Adult Audience
UA - Unrestricted public exibhition with parental Guidence for children under 12
S - public exhibition restricted to Specialized Audience ie. doctors



Edited By hutbay on 1051760553
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: Birmingham
Quick question, not sure if anyone will know this one. I recently got the VCD of the film Saaya (with Shatrughan Sinha and Poonam Dhillon, not the John Abraham one). This is a Ramsay's film, not sure if it is a proper horror, or more of a horror/thriller.

Anyway, to the main question - the film has an 'A' certificate, but has been 're-revised' - anyone know why the film had to be revised (at least) twice?
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » Others » Movie, TV, Music and Box-office

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group