divakar wrote:
I am just supporting publisher's right to protect his video .
In the past good quality of Shemaroo video was used by other publishers/ pirates in their DVDs,
So they decided to use watermark. Now no one can use their good quality PQ of HD Video in DVDs,
Blu-ray discs( after expiry of their tenure) or for HD broadcasting. If they don't use watermark, any HDTV
channel can use their High PQ for their broadcast.
And above all if PQ is good , then it doesn't make any difference if watermark is there or not.
Customers were/are/will buy Blu-ray disc if the PQ and AQ is superb, irrespective of presence of watermark.
The day Shemaroo feels that they are loosing sales due to watermark, they will stop themselves.
I don't like non veg and you like, It doesn't mean that I am right and you are wrong.
I have right not to like non veg and BUT I DONT HAVE RIGHT TO SHOUT AND CALL AATMAARAAM AS KHAATMA RAAM
because he likes non veg.
I too have seen Blu-ray disc of Peepli and bonus disc of DVD . The reviewer has not mentioned anything about the top
of the world PQ of bonus features. Because he liked it .
AND I liked PQ AND AQ OF Ishqiya by SHEMAROO which is far better than Peepli Live PQ and AQ.
So-You like something/ I like something /the reviewer like something.
For me Shemaroo is the best encoding and authoring company in India.
Where is the link of white paper published by Blu-ray association as claimed by Mr. Sunny and Mr. Sanjay
If Shemaroo is violating any rule prescribed by Blu-Ray association - why BDA is not taking any action
What a dimtwit! Just because 2 dimwits like you and gurkrit from bluray.com, purchase the "watermarked" Shemaroo blu-ray doesn't mean anything. It is an intellectual property issue, period, no matter how you spin this issue. I have to commend on your crazy analogies though! BRAVO!