Sanjay wrote:
I fail to understand why there is any debate about 'Monsoon Wedding' being an Indian film, it was produced by an Indian company, it had Indian actors, was shot in India, is in the local Indian language (Hindi, Punjabi & English all very much local Indian languages) and the director is of Indian decent (I am not sure of Mira Nair's citizen status). Does a film have to be made by the regular "Bollywood" fools for it to qualify as an Indian film? By the way the film was elligible to be entered from India for the Academy Awards, I would think all these facts make the film very much Indian.
On the other hand 'Bend It Like Beckham' is a British production, directed by a British Citizen with almost all British actors (some of Indian decent but British) except for Anupam Kher and it is also in just English (British accent to the boot) and the film qualifies as a British entry for the Academy Awards.
monsoon wedding was produced by IFC Productions, which isn't an indian company. It was also shot in Italy, not only delhi. the movie was conceptualised in the US, was scripted in the US, and was paid for by an american company. ultimately, i think that settles the issue - it was not produced or conceptualized by an indian company and in any case, the director left india almost 30 yrs ago. 
secondly, the movie was NOT eligible for the oscars. 
and i wholeheartedly agree that BILB isn't indian - but neither is MW.