It is currently Sun Feb 01, 2026 9:06 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
dograk
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 5:31 pm
Posts: 630
--(ali bhai this is new news...)--

http://www.time.com/time/bestandworst/2002/cinema.html

DEVDAS, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, India
There's no more colorful introduction to Bollywood than this all-singing, all-dancing, all-fired spectacle. The plot, based on a 1917 novel, is good-old family-values propaganda: rich boy (all-world charmer Shahrukh Khan) leaves home, abandons girl friend (former Miss World Aishwarya Rai), dallies with prostitute (worldly-wise Madhuri Dixit), suffers nobly. It's played with such commitment that the tritest plot twists seem worth believing — and singing about, in nine nifty production numbers. Beyond that, Devdas is a visual ravishment, with huge sets, fabulous frocks and beautiful people to fill them; it has a grandeur the old Hollywood moguls would have loved.
Top
 Profile  
 
Kabir
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 234
This is to be expected from Richard Corliss, who is an avid foreign film watcher. The first list, by Schnikel, also lists 'Monsoon Wedding', which I thought was very unrepresentative of Indian culture in general and to put it plainly, just a really bad movie.

Still, its praiseworthy that a critic who seems so all-American as to include 'The Quiet American' and 'Gangs of New York' in his Top 10 list, also included 'Devdas'.

However, you can't really call this list a list of Top Ten Movies of 2002, because two of the films there are actually documentaries/short-films, in particular 'Bowling for Columbine' and 'Russian Ark' which has been getting coverage on PBS. They are not motion pictures in the traditional sense. By that standard, the list is senseless.
Top
 Profile  
 
dograk
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 5:31 pm
Posts: 630
i would argue otherwise. on your point regarding documentaries, isn't the world changing? isn't that why acclaimed documentaries like Bowling For Columbine can become huge box-office successes...also i want to add that i just came back from gangs of new york - and i loved it! so, i would also have put the movie on my top of the year lists!

btw i agree with you regarding monsoon wedding :)
Top
 Profile  
 
adilr17
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 7:32 am
Posts: 106
Well am i watching wrong or u guys..
devdas is under the category og the 4th worst movie of 2002
Top
 Profile  
 
Kabir
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 234
No, there are TWO best-of lists on that page, each listing his own personal Top 10s for the year. The only worst one on that page is 'The Hours'.

By the way, yes, 'Bowling' is a very timely piece I think, but I suppose they should either categorize what theyre going to award or refrain from making up some cockamamie list like this. If you've even heard of 'Russian Ark' you'll probably take issue with its inclusion here. Its a long 'experimental' film. Belongs more in the Maya Deyer catalog.

For example, if I was to make my own Top Ten list and then place 'Titanic' and an episode of 'Colgate Antakshari' in the same Top 10, it would look very silly, wouldn't it?
Top
 Profile  
 
adilr17
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2001 7:32 am
Posts: 106
Are u sure because,
the topic of the listning is the best + WORST.
so the first list may be the best and the second one worst.
Top
 Profile  
 
MalFUnXiON
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 5:22 pm
Posts: 498
Location: NYC, USA
adilr17 wrote:
Are u sure because,
the topic of the listning is the best + WORST.
so the first list may be the best and the second one worst.

Read the description of the movie; doesn't seem like he talks about enough negative points to be on the worst list.

And that list also contains Gangs of NY, LOTR, and Minority Report which I doubt are on the worst list.



Edited By MalFUnXiON on 1040423232
Top
 Profile  
 
kaindiazINC.
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 10:57 pm
Posts: 192
There are two lists by two different people,as pointed out by Kabir. The list (second one) by Richard Corliss has Devdas on number 4 position. The first list by Richard Schickel has Monsoon Wedding on number 5.

Personally, I thought Monsoon Wedding was way much better film than Devdas. Shorter film, more drama.

:devil:
Top
 Profile  
 
Aryan
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 21, 2002 8:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 12:45 pm
Posts: 500
Location: Singapore
Strange how the west seems to prefer over-the-top melodramatic films - i mean i don't mind them...but i don't expect them to like it either.
Top
 Profile  
 
ali2003
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2002 7:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 11:19 am
Posts: 149
Location: Toronto, Canada
Its good to see it getting international recognition, like in Time magazine, but to be honest it still has quite a means to go before it becomes a large contender for best foreign film.

Golden globe award nominees were recently announced and no sign of Devdas among the best foreign film nominees.
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2002 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2254
Location: Birmingham
Going slightly off topic (as I always do) I saw the Bengali version of Devdas, starring Soumitra in the title role with Uttam Kumar playing Chunilal. And sure, it was not as technically well made as SLB's version, and there wasn't as much gloss. But it was so much better!!! A lot more was explained about the main story here. It had glimpses into Chunilal's past, rather than just having him as a character who is needed to make Devdas into an alcoholic. It was only after watching this version that I realised how bad the new version is.
Top
 Profile  
 
sknath
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2002 8:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 4:17 pm
Posts: 2853
Location: Canada
bhaskar wrote:
Going slightly off topic (as I always do) I saw the Bengali version of Devdas, starring Soumitra in the title role with Uttam Kumar playing Chunilal. And sure, it was not as technically well made as SLB's version, and there wasn't as much gloss. But it was so much better!!! A lot more was explained about the main story here. It had glimpses into Chunilal's past, rather than just having him as a character who is needed to make Devdas into an alcoholic. It was only after watching this version that I realised how bad the new version is.

Bhaskar was that a DVD that u saw or a VHS ?
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2002 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2254
Location: Birmingham
sknath wrote:
Bhaskar was that a DVD that u saw or a VHS ?

It was a VHS - I think all the Bengali movies relelased on DVd that I know of have already been mentioned on Zulm.

Just saw Deepa Gahlot's pick of best and worst actors of 2002:

Shah Rukh Khan [Devdas]

Well, somebody's got to say that the emperor's wearing no clothes. Shah Rukh Khan was a disastrous Devdas.

He stumbled, stuttered and hammed his way through the role, making Devdas look like a spoilt collegian who couldn't get tickets to a rock concert.

Devdas as a character was a wimp, but he had gravity, sensitivity and simmering rage that totally escaped Khan's performance.





Edited By bhaskar on 1040987305
Top
 Profile  
 
DVD Collector
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2002 12:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 2070
Location: Toronto, Canada
Devdas tops another film critics top 10 list. The Charlotte Observer Film Critic

btw, Deepa Gahlot's selection carries no real value, she also hated films like Satya & Company and such reasons explain why she tought Vivek Oberoi was superior in Road than in Company.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
hutbay
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 6:54 pm
Posts: 95
its on those list because its the only movie which got the chance to go international with oscar nomination from India and the exposure it got in film festivals especially Cannes. There should be far better movies made in INdia than Devdas, they should look into regional films.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group