It is currently Fri Oct 31, 2025 7:12 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
http://indianwatchdog.netfirms.com/consumers/mujr.html

http://indianwatchdog.netfirms.com/consumers/mkr22.html

MK..dvd..9/10 and MDK..8/10, wow!!! what a comparison!!

:baaa: :stupid: :bangbang:




Edited By arsh on 1035228391


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
On the same scale, my VHS tapes will earn a rating of 7.99. Wow.

Rana


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 4:17 pm
Posts: 2853
Location: Canada
arsh wrote:

Arsh woh kahawat hai na

Bandar Kya Jaane Adrak Ka Swaad ( applies to some esteemed members of the forum here also :D (you know who you are) )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 12:38 am
Posts: 435
So they lower the score of MK because it doesn't have any extras relating to the film, but they don't do the same for MDK which completely lacks extras?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 4:17 pm
Posts: 2853
Location: Canada
RNJBOND wrote:
So they lower the score of MK because it doesn't have any extras relating to the film, but they don't do the same for MDK which completely lacks extras?

So they lower the score of MK because it doesn't have any extras relating to the film ( and which is presented in a progressively encoded manner with proper flag settings), but they don't do the same for MDK which completely lacks extras? ( and which is presented in an interlaced fashion with improper flag settings).....

...would be a correct statement.
Actually if you noticed that site Rishi... it is "funded" in some way by Yashraj and Eros ( like free DVds for review etc.) So I wont be surprised if they actually have the Temerity to publish those things there... considering the fact that Mission Kashmir earned high marks in some reputed DVD magazines, I wouldnt go for such comments made by others .. what do you say ?




Edited By sknath on 1035240829


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
[what do you say ? ]

'HOLLY SHIT" as I said before!! :stupid: :bangbang: :angry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2002 2:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 12:38 am
Posts: 435
sknath wrote:
RNJBOND wrote:
So they lower the score of MK because it doesn't have any extras relating to the film, but they don't do the same for MDK which completely lacks extras?

So they lower the score of MK because it doesn't have any extras relating to the film ( and which is presented in a progressively encoded manner with proper flag settings), but they don't do the same for MDK which completely lacks extras? ( and which is presented in an interlaced fashion with improper flag settings).....

...would be a correct statement.
Actually if you noticed that site Rishi... it is "funded" in some way by Yashraj and Eros ( like free DVds for review etc.) So I wont be surprised if they actually have the Temerity to publish those things there... considering the fact that Mission Kashmir earned high marks in some reputed DVD magazines, I wouldnt go for such comments made by others .. what do you say ?

Makes sense, I agree.

Biased reviews are the best! :thumbs:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group