|
I wonder, has any DVD of Sholay been mastered (as [I feel] it should be) from the 70mm print of the film, rather than from the 3mm one? As far as I know, Sholay was shot on 70mm film, which means that its "aspect ratio" was — not 4:3/1.33:1 (or 1.37:1, if we're to account for the sound track) or 2.35:1 (it couldn't have been 2.39:1, as that ratio wasn't in use as early as the 1970s, and certainly wouldn't have been used in India in 1975) — 2.2:1. As 70mm-film projectors were not common back then (hell, they've never really been "common" anywhere in the world, at any time), the movie was likely converted to 35mm for the purpose of usability, at which point a decision was probably made to project the picture in the 2.35:1 aspect ratio (35mm film, I doubt, could be projected at 2.2:1; 1.33:1 would have been a ludicrous choice to make, as the sides would have been just unacceptably cut off). At 2.35:1, of course, picture information couldn't be "added" at the sides, so a bit would have to have been chopped off at the top and at the bottom. This all said, the Eros DVD of the film is presented 4:3, and it doesn't look as though we're missing a hell of a lot of important information at the sides. This, indeed, makes me feel that it's possible that Sholay was shot both in both the 70mm format (for the few cinema halls that supported it) and the 35mm format (for the remaining majority). Regarding "versions," I've always been exposed to the "Asrani" scenes (though I've been told, by family, that they were inserted later on, when the film had proved a success) and the "Gabbar-goes-to-jail ending"; of course, I don't remember about the smaller things, such as the "Basanti chase" (that leads to the song, "Jab Tak Hai Jaan") and the "spiking of Thakur Saheb's shoes." (I don't remember about Gabbar's torturing Sachin's character, either... I think I remember the latter's simply having gone out, seen two dacoits and Gabbar, and being brought back to the village, dead, on his horse.)
As for the sound, with the 70mm print, it must have been four-channel surround sound. If, indeed, there's an "original" 35mm version, as well, I can't fathom the sound it should have.
At last week's showing of the film (on Monday, September 4, 2006, at 8:00 P.M.) at the Walter Reade Theater of the Lincoln Center (in New York City), I believe that picture was in the 2.2:1 aspect ratio. Gabbar was arrested at the end, Sachin's character wasn't shown being tortured, and Asrani made his appearance.
|