It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 3:23 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2010 11:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:08 am
Posts: 505
Do both the UK/US Eros Version & the Indian Eros Version have the same menu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
newDEEP wrote:
I picked the Indian EROS DVD yesterday -- it said "packed Dec 2008, Rs.99" but when I peeled this sticker off, I could see "packed 2006, Rs.250".

LOLZ! Even I do the peeling stuff! ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
I think Eros titles for Navketan films are pretty good. I liked their Jewel Thief, Guide & Johnny Mera Naam more than Shemaroo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
From various screen shots on the prev page, and comments, it's obvious, EROS release in India, replicated by KRCD has a far better print than the other versions.

I thought I had the Shemaroo version and as I saw an EROS DVD, I picked it up. At home, as I checked, although it was EROS, it was not the one replicated by KRCD version. Instead, it was by Jet Speed. But, it sure was Indian version.
The DVD that I did bnot remember that I already had was US/ UK version EROS DVD of a few Yrs back.

Comparing the 2 EROS versions that I have, here are my observations:

1) EROS DVD replicated by Jet Speed, is not the same as KRCD one. Actually, it's much closer to the US/UK version. Although it has 5 frame repeat pattern (meaning no 4% speed shift) it seems to be copied from the US/ UK version, with some loss in PQ. It's further evident by noticing combing pattern (Power DVD - Force Weave) that shows 4 combing frames and one non-combing frame (never seen this pattern before) sequence. The US/ UK version is 3 non-combing and two combing frames. Looks like, the US/UK version was used as master to make the Jet Speed version, adding 2 more combing frames, in 5 frame sequence, due to mismatch or something ??

2) Both DVD covers state the film length to be 165 min while it's the full 174 min in both DVD versions.
1970 Film CC shows 4784 meters which is 174 min run time.

I have no idea, how to get lucky finding the KRCD replicated EROS DVD ?? It seems to be the best PQ.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
Is the Eros KRCD Indian version Progressive?? Or interlaced with no speed - up (what we call 'Pseudo - Progressive)??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
Ragz wrote:
Is the Eros KRCD Indian version Progressive?? Or interlaced with no speed - up (what we call 'Pseudo - Progressive)??

Looking at the shots Newdeep provided, KRCD replicated EROS DVD is very sharp and it may very well be Progressive. As Newdeep mentioned its run time at full 174 min, it's Film to NTSC, most likely Progressive or at least a good Pseudo Prog.

(We have been calling Pseudo Progressive to those encodings that don't have Progressive Flags and don't contain more than one film frame info in one video field. This way, with a suitable routine, one can recreate the original film frames and re-encode into a 24 fps Progressive video. If the video fields are mixed up into each other, you can't do that.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
Thanks!!
But Shame - Aroo Pseudo Progressive DVDs cannot recreate 24 frames possibly due to Chroma - Lag (?)... correct me if I'm wrong.
I've also seen Eagle DVDs of JMN in stores. To be avoided, yes?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
Ragz wrote:
Thanks!!
But Shame - Aroo Pseudo Progressive DVDs cannot recreate 24 frames possibly due to Chroma - Lag (?)... correct me if I'm wrong.

Correcting chroma lag should not be a problem as chroma and luminance signals are separated as we know since the Super-VHS days. But, the question is, did some equipment manufacturer think of this possibility that someone could be doing it, to begin with ?? Once known of this possibility, making a routine to pick up chroma signal and put it back with the original frame should be trivial.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
But why don't Shemaroo DVDs detect 2 - 3 pulldown and play Pseudo - Progressive DVDs as Progressive?

-----------------------

newDEEP, can you confirm whether your KRCD replicated version is Progressive or not?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
Mr. rana, I think, you had once mentioned that Shemaroo M - E - A color DVD has Chroma Lag, & hence, can't detect 2 - 3 or 3 - 2 (I don't know) pulldown, or something like that ??

I can't recall 100 %, nor can I locate or quote the same as I'm using my Nokia 3110 cell which will take hell lot of time.

Do you remember?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
This is what you said there :)
Quote:
Shemaroo DVD is NTSC and is Pseudo-Progressive. (But, usual chroma lagging behind luminance problem; hence, pixel comparing routines may or may not detect the 2-3 pull down)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
Depends on the comparison criteria and on noise tolerance.

1-C1, 1-C1, 2-C2, 2-C2, 2-C2, 3-C3, 3-C3, 4-C4, 4-C4, 4-C4, - - - - See 2-3 sequence.

With Chroma shift:
-------1C1, 2C1, 2C2, 2C2, 3C2, 3C3, 4C3, 4C4, 4C4, - - - - See, there is no 2-3 sequence if comparing routine is looking at Chroma signal as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
^ LOL!! :lol: All this is beyond the comprehension of my immature mind!! :lol:

But I appreciate your knowledge and patience a lot :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
It's a simple sequence recognition. Let me make it more clear:

1C1, 1C1,
2C2, 2C2, 2C2,
3C3, 3C3,
4C4, 4C4, 4C4,
5C5,5C5,
6C6,6C6,6C6

(1C1: first 1 is the frame #, C1 is Chroma signal meant for frame #1)

See, there is 2-3,2-3,2-3 sequence.

If chroma lag, you won't see this 2-3 sequence.
1C1,
2C1,
2C2, 2C2,
3C2,
3C3,
4C3,
4C4, 4C4,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 1493
Thanks for the clarification! :)
Deeply appreciated!
Will ponder soon.. Got 'Mole Concept' from Chemistry to break my head over!

I'm understanding much better now.
Thanks!! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group